Skip to comments.
Dick Morris: Romney Should Win in a Landslide
Real Clear Politics ^
| 05/11/2012
| Dick Morris
Posted on 05/11/2012 8:12:06 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
To: SeekAndFind
America deserves a blowout, Willard doesn’t.
21
posted on
05/11/2012 8:49:37 AM PDT
by
Sybeck1
(If Romney needs my vote to win Mississippi, he is in a heck of a lot trouble more than me.)
To: GBA
Morris must think a real conservative is running and not the jerk Romney who is.
To: napscoordinator
I don’t like Willard.
But a cons friend of mine explained that he’s much closer to our side than the anti-American fraud currently occupying the WH. So I have to vote for him if he’s the R nom.
23
posted on
05/11/2012 9:35:19 AM PDT
by
bicyclerepair
( REPLACE D-W-S ! http://www.karenforcongress.com)
To: NE Cons
NE Cons
Since May 7, 2012
Welcome to FR.
Morris is ALWAYS wrong. ALWAYS.
His prediction for the House - "The GOP will capture the House by a goodly margin, winning upward of 60-plus seats..."
And how many seats did the GOP pickup? Sixty three.
While Morris did incorrectly predict a Senate take over by the GOP, he isn't ALWAYS wrong ... and I also agree with him ... 0bama loses in a landslide.
24
posted on
05/11/2012 9:43:00 AM PDT
by
oh8eleven
(RVN '67-'68)
To: oh8eleven
What does my start date have to do with it? Like I have less cred? Can't you argue on other things?
Anyone here that has followed Morris knows he's been notoriously wrong. And he HAS
25
posted on
05/11/2012 9:44:44 AM PDT
by
NE Cons
To: SeekAndFind
How accurate has Dick Morris been lately? Not terribly. He tends to exaggerate his points. I wouldn't dismiss what he says but I would want others confirming it.
26
posted on
05/11/2012 9:45:08 AM PDT
by
OrangeHoof
(Evil never reveals the truth until it's too late to flee.)
To: oh8eleven
He predicted over 100 House seats, not 60
He predicted a Senate takeover.
27
posted on
05/11/2012 9:45:56 AM PDT
by
NE Cons
To: oh8eleven
Look at the other replies on this thread. Similar to what I said
28
posted on
05/11/2012 9:47:14 AM PDT
by
NE Cons
To: TomGuy
This from the guy who was certain the 2008 race would between Hillary and Condi. I thought it was Hillary and Giuliani, which actually was the pre-Iowa conventional wisdom from inside the Beltway in '08.
29
posted on
05/11/2012 9:49:57 AM PDT
by
OrangeHoof
(Evil never reveals the truth until it's too late to flee.)
To: SeekAndFind
Morris knows how to read polls.
Where he goes wrong is when he extends himself to conjecture far afield from that. (E.g, Hillary vs. Condi in 2008)
To: oh8eleven
Check this out. Morris prediction '10 elections.
http://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DWuwntAwL9Ik&sa=U&ei=C0OtT9_fLcLM6QGBkL3-DA&ved=0CCIQtwIwBg&usg=AFQjCNE1reue6O6JnTs7kWjODXeG_RzI9A
He also predicted Trump would run...
Predicted Condi vs. Hillary for Pres in '08. I could go on an on.
31
posted on
05/11/2012 9:54:56 AM PDT
by
NE Cons
To: oh8eleven
My gosh, man - GET A GRIP!!
Don’t you know where you are? This is FreeRepublic: you cannot seriously suggest here that there might be any future ahead for Romney. We’re talking Romney - you know, ROMNEY! What, are you a troll, delusional, a cretin, or some sort of anti-American subversive?
Get with the program, fellow. If some pundit suggests Romney may have a chance, or - Heaven forbid - might have a good quality or two, that pundit must be smeared. MUST BE SMEARED! Get it?
Sheesh!
/s
32
posted on
05/11/2012 10:28:42 AM PDT
by
dagogo redux
(A whiff of primitive spirits in the air, harbingers of an impending descent into the feral.)
To: OrangeHoof
I thought it was Hillary and Giuliani, which actually was the pre-Iowa conventional wisdom from inside the Beltway in '08.Unfortunately, it was Hillary and Condi. He actually wrote a book about it: Condi Vs. Hillary: The Next Great Presidential Race
I wish Morris was right on this. I think Romney's gonna win but I don't see a landslide happening. It's going to be a nail-biter.
33
posted on
05/11/2012 10:29:59 AM PDT
by
Drew68
(I WILL vote to defeat Barack Hussein Obama!)
To: NE Cons
His actual prediction was we would take 60 to 80 seats, but it could go as high as 100.
I think claiming he prediced 100 seats is a stretch.
34
posted on
05/11/2012 10:39:35 AM PDT
by
CharacterCounts
(A vote for the lesser of two evils only insures the triumph of evil.)
To: CharacterCounts
What’s the difference? On Hannity, he actually said 100.
35
posted on
05/11/2012 10:46:17 AM PDT
by
NE Cons
To: SeekAndFind
36
posted on
05/11/2012 10:50:23 AM PDT
by
Cyber Liberty
(Obama considers the Third World morally superior to the United States.)
To: NE Cons
Whats the difference?
Everyone else was predicting 35 to 40. I think he was actually the most accurate.
37
posted on
05/11/2012 10:59:25 AM PDT
by
CharacterCounts
(A vote for the lesser of two evils only insures the triumph of evil.)
To: SeekAndFind
38
posted on
05/11/2012 11:06:02 AM PDT
by
Wordkraft
(Remember who the Collaborators are.)
To: CharacterCounts
OK, fair point. Thanks. But he’s been way wrong on so many other predictions. Wish he was right.
39
posted on
05/11/2012 11:19:34 AM PDT
by
NE Cons
To: SeekAndFind
He was VERY wrong about the Senate in the 2010 election, but anyway Dick, shut up—why fire up THEIR base with this idiocy?
40
posted on
05/11/2012 11:23:16 AM PDT
by
Pharmboy
(Democrats lie because they must.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson