The Washington Post Bullies Romney

INterestingly enough at that period of time if you wore long hair (particularly if you bleached it) you were thought to be a no good California surfer bum....lots of young men ended up being held down and getting a hair cut they may not have wanted. Life went on.

OK we get it. We all get it here. Romney Obama the same.

But the issue of this thread is the Washington Post!

So now because you napalm the conversation with Obama same as Romney there can be no serious discussion regarding the thread and we all walk away,

Now who won?

The media and soros or you?

I knew you would agree.

BTW, I've been pushing the race to the bottom idea since way back last Fall when Romney was having a hard time breaking 20% ~ when he had even Michele Bachmann and Pawlenty as his only competition.

It's all coming true ~ we HAVE to find something better. Else it's beginning to look like we may have a Twelfth Amendment situation:

"The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice. "

Those who wanted better should have coalesced around a single ‘acceptable’ candidate rather than acting like purists and insisting that their guy/gal was the only possible true believer. Romney may well have won by attrtion but conservatives seem hell bent on shooting their wounded

"fair and square"?

No, not in Virginia. His boys here made a last minute rule change that tossed the primary to Romney.

That is called CHEATING. This was Romney's first real test of personal ethics and he failed by NOT rejecting the result.

The man didn't win "Fair and Square" ~ he's a cheater, a liar, and a coward.

We had 10 generally well known candidates, although I provided a full list of 14 the other day. There were only 3 lifelong Republican Conservatives in the list.

The majority of the other candidates were clearly RINOS ~ no matter how you define that term. I've gone over their qualifications several times.

Their purpose was simply to distract primary voters from the purpose of narrowing the race down to qualified Conservative candidates.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.