Skip to comments.
Hillary: ‘Government Cannot and Should Not Control Any Individual's Life’
CNSNews ^
Posted on 05/16/2012 5:07:59 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
To: Lurker
If this surprises you, raise your hand. There's no other explanation for all the "Democrats fear Zero is unelectable" stories we've been seeing lately. The Bamster is doing the Slave Party equivalent of the RINO swan dive, on cue. I can't see Romnuts doing anything but taking a political powder under the circumstances. From 'first black President' to 'first woman President,' here we come. Sorry ladies, but I'm afraid that there are just too many women who would get all tingly about this for a squishy RINO pulling his punches in the name of chivalry to overcome. Hence, the media game will be to start by playing up 'Romney is mean.' He'll respond by trying to prove he's 'a nice guy.' Game over.
21
posted on
05/16/2012 5:28:39 PM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(The RNC would prefer Obama to a conservative nominee.)
To: Sub-Driver
Oh, really? This, from the woman who said “We’re going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good” in June of 2004?
To: Sub-Driver
Uh... did she run this by Premier Hussein?
There’s a definite difference of opinion (and policy) there.
To: Carry_Okie
24
posted on
05/16/2012 5:31:04 PM PDT
by
Lurker
(Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
To: Sub-Driver
Hillary proves life is so much easier when you forget what you’ve done in the past.
25
posted on
05/16/2012 5:31:57 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
To: Baynative
oh yeah...
26
posted on
05/16/2012 5:42:12 PM PDT
by
Chode
(American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: Sub-Driver
27
posted on
05/16/2012 5:42:38 PM PDT
by
Servant of the Cross
(the Tea Party movement: more obstinate, unyielding and hostile to Democrats Â…)
To: Carry_Okie
Sorry ladies, but I'm afraid that there are just too many women who would get all tingly about this for a squishy RINO pulling his punches in the name of chivalry to overcome. Hence, the media game will be to start by playing up 'Romney is mean.' He'll respond by trying to prove he's 'a nice guy.' Game over. One problem with your scenario.
If the Democrat party gives the boot to "the first black president" -- in favor of "the first womean president" -- they will lose the black vote. Forever.
And, if the Democrat Party can't command 90% of the black vote, they will never win another election.
28
posted on
05/16/2012 5:44:54 PM PDT
by
okie01
To: crosshairs
Translation: I’m gay, give me your children.
29
posted on
05/16/2012 5:46:01 PM PDT
by
donna
(The fruits of Feminism: Angry fathers, bitter mothers, fat kids and political correctness.)
To: Sub-Driver
(T)o make the case for civil society is really quite simple because government cannot and should not control any individuals life tell you what to do, what not to do, Clinton said, taking part in a Global Dialogue of Civil Society.
Guffaw! A disciple of Alynski. What an odd, incongruous thing to say in a discussion of civil society. She's never believed that. With every fiber of her being, she has always lived and breathed as an unadulterated statist. A true believer. A subtle dance to the right during an election year? Trying to sound more centrist? Somebody contemplating an 11th-hour run for Pres?
30
posted on
05/16/2012 5:46:19 PM PDT
by
PowderMonkey
(WILL WORK FOR AMMO)
To: Sub-Driver
It means something entirely different when she says it.
Conservatives: Gov't should not make laws to take away my freedom, property and livelihood.
Liberals: Gov't should not make laws to curtail abortions, food stamps, handouts, benefits, affirmative action etc.
31
posted on
05/16/2012 5:48:22 PM PDT
by
BitWielder1
(Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
To: Sub-Driver
32
posted on
05/16/2012 5:51:33 PM PDT
by
Luke21
To: freekitty
You got that right - wonder what the Hill is posturing for this time.
To: Sub-Driver
That must have been said with a wink and a nod!
34
posted on
05/16/2012 5:57:40 PM PDT
by
MtnClimber
(To the left wrong is right, down is up and backward is "Forward")
Comment #35 Removed by Moderator
To: Sub-Driver
O.O
Hillary? As in Queen Hillary the Bimbo Slayer? Vanquisher of Vincent Foster and Sworn Guardian of Prince Priapism?
SHE said this?
Someone needs to check the temperature in Hades, quick!
36
posted on
05/16/2012 6:12:35 PM PDT
by
Dr.Zoidberg
(With (R)epublicans like these, who needs (D)emocrats?)
To: Sub-Driver
Come on, you expect us to believe this?
She’s the one who said, “It takes a village.” She wants government to run every facet of our lives. She tried to get Obamacare going in her husband’s first term.
37
posted on
05/16/2012 6:16:19 PM PDT
by
Rocky
(Obama is pure evil)
To: Sub-Driver
And her nose grew 10 feet after that comment.
What a laugh.
Controling people’s lives is what she dreams of every second of her miserable life.
38
posted on
05/16/2012 6:17:58 PM PDT
by
CapnJack
To: Sioux-san
39
posted on
05/16/2012 6:26:14 PM PDT
by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
To: Carry_Okie
Personally, I don’t think Romney has a chance, even against Obama. But I do think that the Democrats may simply be sick of Obama. A lot of his corporate fanciers have seen the cold light of day, I think his inept handling of the Afgahn situation and other foreign situations has alienated even a lot of Democrats, and it is pretty clear that Obamacare is not popular with anybody and will probably be overturned.
He is focusing on an increasingly narrower segment of the Democratic constituency, and while Hollywood and blacks may like him no matter what, the rest of the Dems are feeling a bit neglected. I think they would be very happy to replace him, particularly with Hillary. Hollywood would come around, blacks might not vote for Hillary but they certainly wouldn’t vote for the Republican either, and I think it would give the Democrats as a whole a chance to regroup and no longer feel the party was focused on just one group (blacks) with one program (redistribution of income) and one goal (government uber alles).
So personally, I don’t see this as an unlikely scenario at all.
40
posted on
05/16/2012 6:28:36 PM PDT
by
livius
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson