Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/18/2012 6:47:46 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

New study: there are 100,000,000 too many people, which is exactly the number of environmentalists.


2 posted on 05/18/2012 6:51:19 PM PDT by chuck_the_tv_out
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

The EOTWAWKI will undoubtedly come....and NOT in any of the ways these fellow travelers envision.

The fact that they’re so stoooopid doesn’t help.


4 posted on 05/18/2012 6:56:59 PM PDT by RightOnline (I am Andrew Breitbart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The Club of Rome proved this back around 1970. (/s)

5 posted on 05/18/2012 7:04:11 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

We were all supposed to die at the change of the millenium anyway so we are on borrowed time.


6 posted on 05/18/2012 7:09:51 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

If I had a nickel for every doomsday prediction not including 2012 ‘til now.. I could afford ObammyCare.. as it is, no one gets out anyway.. or so I heard.


7 posted on 05/18/2012 7:13:45 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Look at places like NYC, Tokyo and Seoul... if it were that crowded you could fit everyone on Earth into Texas. Please don’t though.


8 posted on 05/18/2012 7:18:12 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; KevinDavis

we can have resources of 2 Earths if we mine asteroids.


9 posted on 05/18/2012 7:19:28 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Rush covered this this morning. This is how he puts it: If you have one cup of sugar, and that is all you have, how do you use up two cups.
11 posted on 05/18/2012 7:24:22 PM PDT by fish hawk (Religion: Man's attempt to gain salvation or the approbation of God by his own works)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Run for the hills: Yet another study informs us of the imminent end of life as we know it

This just can't be happening! Why, my libturd pinko English teacher in 1971 made us read "The Population Bomb" which predicted that people would literally be standing on top of each by 1995 or 2005 or something like that. I must admit, every time someone gets too close to me, I tense up, thinking he or she may all of sudden catapult onto my shoulders and stand on top of me... Ohhh the horror! /sarc

Isn't it amazing? The libTurds & their media partisan hacks, and the environmental whackos all breathlessly report on some doomsday tragedy, but they mock & deride the Genesis worldwide flood or of the soon return of Christ & destruction of the world bv fire as predicted in II Peter. It must be because they can't make any profit or book sales by stating the Biblical account.

12 posted on 05/18/2012 7:28:21 PM PDT by rcrngroup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
“The federal government is in a unique position to influence the development of oil shale because nearly three-quarters of the oil shale within the Green River Formation lies beneath federal lands managed by the Department of the Interior’s (Interior) Bureau of Land Management (BLM),” she testified.

How long before Obama declares this land a national monument removing it from possible developement?

13 posted on 05/18/2012 7:31:23 PM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Mr Leape stresses that the starting point for reducing our impact on the planet is to end our love affair with fossil fuels – “the energy technology of the 20th century” – and switch to renewable energy.

Our impact on the planet has been to make it a better and safer place for human beings. I'm not interested in lessening that impact in any way. And while "renewable energy" is an article of faith among the enviro-cultists, the reality isn't much better now than it was 30 years ago. Solar and wind are still vastly less efficient than fossil fuels - far too inefficient to provide the energy needed by a modern civilization. I've heard talk of nanotechnology making solar vastly more efficient but we're not nearly there yet.

There is a clean, efficient, readily available source of energy in nuclear fission plants, but thanks to the environmentalists they are prohibitively expensive to build and their construction is often delayed for decades.
14 posted on 05/18/2012 8:01:38 PM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

There are lots of untapped resources for future generations. Much land is currently off limits for exploration. Open that up, and we’ll have lots of oil and mineral resources for hundreds of years. Not to mention what is hidden below lakes and oceans.

The problem is pollution, and more often than not it is young liberals who recklessly pollute. We could clean up our nation tremendously by banning take-out food and it’s packaging. Liberals would howl the loudest.


16 posted on 05/19/2012 12:56:38 PM PDT by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson