Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hawaii to Ariz.: Prove need to verify Obama birth
My Fox Phoenix.Com ^ | 5/19/2012 | Joshua Wisch

Posted on 05/19/2012 9:35:37 AM PDT by Elderberry

OBAMA-ARIZONA BALLOT

Hawaii to Ariz.: Prove need to verify Obama birth

PHOENIX (AP) - The attorney general's office in Hawaii is telling Arizona's secretary of state that if he wants confirmation of President Barack Obama's birth records, he'll have to prove he legitimately needs it.

Special Assistant Joshua Wisch said late Friday that Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett hasn't done that despite numerous email and phone exchanges between their offices.

Wisch says Hawaii state laws require Bennett to show legal authority that this office needs the records to update its official lists as part of its ordinary work.

Wisch says as soon as Bennett gives Hawaii adequate authority, the Aloha State will verify Obama's birth.

Bennett said in a radio interview this week that Obama's status on Arizona's ballot is in question unless Hawaii verifies his birthplace.

Hawaii officials have confirmed multiple times that Obama was born there.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: 2scary4words; 2suspicious4words; birthcertificate; coverup; eligibility; hawaii; illegalalien; naturalborncitizen; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-217 next last
To: Elderberry; Travis McGee
Hawaii officials have confirmed multiple times that Obama was born there.

Then those "officials" should have let 0bama know this "fact" when the following write-ups were done on him (thank TravisMcGee for the image!) in 1992, 1998 and 2007!

Photobucket

41 posted on 05/19/2012 10:14:20 AM PDT by Sister_T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper
I agree.

My mom told me over & over, “If you tell one lie, you must tell 10 more to cover it”. The end result is often a lying mass of goo blubbering like a fool.

Between Hawaiian officials & Obama, they have more lies going than even Mohammed the Liar could cover with the help of every Jinn in Arabia.

The tactic now is to STALL, STALL, STALL beyond November, when the questions become moot.

42 posted on 05/19/2012 10:16:56 AM PDT by Mister Da (The mark of a wise man is not what he knows, but what he knows he doesn't know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

“attorney general’s office in Hawaii”

Oh Mister Attorney General in Hawaii, remember Bath-House Barry has ALREADY released his birth certificate to the public. Remember that Mister Attorney General? It’s supposedly already public information.


43 posted on 05/19/2012 10:17:37 AM PDT by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry
“Wisch says Hawaii state laws require Bennett to show legal authority that this office needs the records to update its official lists as part of its ordinary work...”

‘Hawaii officials have confirmed multiple times that Obama was born there.”

Under what “legal authority” did they provide it multiple times?

44 posted on 05/19/2012 10:19:43 AM PDT by dmet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry
Here's the initial certification of Obama's eligibility back in 2008 (note reference to U.S. Constitution at end opening paragraph):

Here's the one that was finally submitted (reference to U.S. Constitution REMOVED):

DOES THIS EXPIRE SEPT. 6, 2011? DO ANY FREEPERS KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT THIS?

45 posted on 05/19/2012 10:22:44 AM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

Liberals don’t believe in state sovereignty, so they don’t think it can be proved to their satisfaction, so no BC.

Simple, but corrupt.


46 posted on 05/19/2012 10:22:52 AM PDT by Mister Da (The mark of a wise man is not what he knows, but what he knows he doesn't know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie
FWIW, I visited the AZ Election Laws online and found them to be close to an incomprehensible mess. I assume there is a section there that allows Bennett to do what he threatens.FWIW, I visited the AZ Election Laws online and found them to be close to an incomprehensible mess. I assume there is a section there that allows Bennett to do what he threatens.

Do you have a link?

47 posted on 05/19/2012 10:24:23 AM PDT by InterceptPoint (TIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry
Here's the initial certification of Obama's eligibility back in 2008 (note reference to U.S. Constitution at end opening paragraph):

Here's the one that was finally submitted (reference to U.S. Constitution REMOVED):

DOES THIS EXPIRE SEPT. 6, 2011? DO ANY FREEPERS KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT THIS?

Source: http://www.wnd.com/2009/09/109363/

48 posted on 05/19/2012 10:24:25 AM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry
What law? I know they passed some laws to make it harder for people to inquire about BCs. Was this law they are now citing one of the NEW ones they passed to protect Obama?
49 posted on 05/19/2012 10:29:41 AM PDT by faucetman ( Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice
It does look like Arizona has obama by the balls.

1. Don't put pukie on the ballot, forcing a lawsuit.

2. Have the official findings of Sheriff Arpio to stand as cause to create cause for denial of putting pukie on the ballot.

3. Go to court and bring in all of the experts on document forgery, and prove the anal swipes the white house put up was pure sofistry.

4. A reasonable judge and jury should be able to use the facts, logic, and reason to understand pukie is a fraud.

50 posted on 05/19/2012 10:32:03 AM PDT by Texas Songwriter (Ia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
NO, its the notary's commission expiration date.
51 posted on 05/19/2012 10:33:11 AM PDT by faucetman ( Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: faucetman

I’m afraid that Laws don’t mean much to them anymore. They are just stalling and stonewalling.


52 posted on 05/19/2012 10:36:51 AM PDT by Elderberry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry
Sounds like the Hawaii Attorney General is running interference for the Ubama administration.

I certainly hope he is being compensated adequately for his assistance.

53 posted on 05/19/2012 10:37:43 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Do I really need a sarcasm tag? Seriously? You're that dense?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue
As if there was any doubt, this is WAY beyond Obama. The number of people aiding and abetting is staggering.

Powerful entities wanted this man in place to do their bidding. They may indeed have decided to switch puppets and use Romney this time, but they are still going to make sure their tracks remain thoroughly covered.

But I'm not quite sure what they are afraid of if they already have the power to guarantee an election result they like. I don't think enough of the American public retains sufficient capacity for righteous anger to do any harm to the ongoing establishment of their New World Order, anyway.

54 posted on 05/19/2012 10:39:08 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves (CTRL-GALT-DELETE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

‘Obama Mystery Theater: Who’s Your Nanny? Obama’s Servants’

One thing that becomes more apparent by the day is that Barack Obama is at best prevaricating when he pretends to come from a humble background. The soon-to-be-released book by David Maraniss, excerpted by Vanity Fair magazine, reports that both of Obama’s white college girlfriends were wealthy and from prominent families, as were his many Pakistani friends. What are the odds that all of Barry’s chums were rich?

Of course, Obama supporters will likely rationalize that since he attended the creme de la creme of colleges–on loans and scholarships, of course–then he had no choice but to befriend the wealthy because he was the only “poor” student. Note, however, that one must very carefully read all mainstream media articles about Obama’s past, as well as the many authorized biographies, to discern truth from planned befuddlement.

What’s seldom publicized in the mainstream media are the circumstances of his childhood–that the homes in which he lived in Indonesia were relatively luxurious and that the family had many servants such as chauffeurs, cooks, maids, and nannies for the three children...

http://wtpotus.wordpress.com/2012/05/16/obama-mystery-theater-whos-your-nanny-obamas-servants/


55 posted on 05/19/2012 10:39:32 AM PDT by Hotlanta Mike (Resurrect the House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC)...before there is no America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry; All; Hotlanta Mike; TheCipher; little jeremiah; bitt; STARWISE; onyx; edge919; ...

Here’s what’s going on, from a post I posted elsewhere, at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2885601/posts?page=69#69 There are other comments on that thread that make clear what else the HDOH has done, and another comment that makes clear their predicament (and why they’re trying to stall on this) is at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2885601/posts?page=54#54 (and I apologize in advance for the formatting not working. You can see it better at my blog if the formatting drives you nuts).

Anyway, here’s what’s going on with the HDOH’s particular claim about what Bennett has to prove:

Once again Hawaii is totally ignoring/misinterpreting their own laws, as Ken Bennett knows full well. This is what HRS 338-18 says about a letter of verification (found at http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/Vol06_Ch0321-0344/HRS0338/HRS_0338-0018.htm ):

“(g) The department shall not issue a verification in lieu of a certified copy of any such record, or any part thereof, unless it is satisfied that the applicant requesting a verification is:

(1) A person who has a direct and tangible interest in the record but requests a verification in lieu of a certified copy;

(2) A governmental agency or organization who for a legitimate government purpose maintains and needs to update official lists of persons in the ordinary course of the agency’s or organization’s activities;

(3) A governmental, private, social, or educational agency or organization who seeks confirmation of a certified copy of any such record submitted in support of or information provided about a vital event relating to any such record and contained in an official application made in the ordinary course of the agency’s or organization’s activities by an individual seeking employment with, entrance to, or the services or products of the agency or organization;

(4) A private or government attorney who seeks to confirm information about a vital event relating to any such record which was acquired during the course of or for purposes of legal proceedings; or

(5) An individual employed, endorsed, or sponsored by a governmental, private, social, or educational agency or organization who seeks to confirm information about a vital event relating to any such record in preparation of reports or publications by the agency or organization for research or educational purposes. [L 1949, c 327, §22; RL 1955, §57-21; am L Sp 1959 2d, c 1, §19; am L 1967, c 30, §2; HRS §338-18; am L 1977, c 118, §1; am L 1991, c 190, §1; am L 1997, c 305, §5; am L 2001, c 246, §2]”

The HDOH is pretending that Bennett is asking for this under (2) above, but he is clearly asking for it under (3). It is the normal course of operations for the SOS’s office to receive an application for placement on the ballot, and AZ’s application process requires that the candidate be a “natural born US citizen”. Obama has applied to be on the ballot, and Bennett is seeking confirmation of “information provided about a vital event relating to any such record and contained in an official application”. Obama’s AZ application claims he is eligible to be President and that is related to what is actually contained on Obama’s birth record.

The HDOH is trying to stall again. I’ve been through this rat-race with them dozens of times. Unfortunately for them, Bennett has set the default at DENIAL of placement on the ballot. IOW, if the HDOH stalls they’re only making it certain that Obama will not be allowed on the ballot.

I can’t wait for the HDOH to declare Bennett a “vexatious requestor” who they thus don’t have to answer. lol. With any luck, the HDOH will thoroughly piss him off, just by being the jerks we all already know them to be. lol


56 posted on 05/19/2012 10:43:38 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

Can HI’s AG prove that he’s the guy that says yea or nay? Does Kenya have an AG?


57 posted on 05/19/2012 10:45:42 AM PDT by gundog (Help us, Nairobi-Wan Kenobi...you're our only hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

” The attorney general’s office in Hawaii is telling Arizona’s secretary of state that if he wants confirmation of President Barack Obama’s birth records, he’ll have to prove he legitimately needs it. “

This speaks volumes...they can’t verify anything.


58 posted on 05/19/2012 10:46:40 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry; Berlin_Freeper; Hotlanta Mike; Silentgypsy; repubmom; HANG THE EXPENSE; Nepeta; ...


Hawaii officials have confirmed multiple times that Obama was born there.

REALLY?

Then why are they so afraid to show the douments?

59 posted on 05/19/2012 10:47:22 AM PDT by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

Arizona legislature should ask for the USS Arizona to be returned to the state of Arizona for proper dispensation and respect.


60 posted on 05/19/2012 10:48:37 AM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-217 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson