Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Council speaker Christine Quinn weds same-sex partner Kim Catullo (The next mayor of NYC...)
NY Post ^ | 5/19/12 | KATE KOVOSH and DON KAPLAN

Posted on 05/19/2012 5:54:33 PM PDT by jimbo123

For just one day, Christine Quinn wasn’t the speaker — she was the bride.

Quinn tied the knot with her longtime partner Kim Catullo just after 7 p.m. tonight in a lavish, private affair just 10 days after President Obama announced his support for gay marriage. It was the city’s highest-profile same-sex nuptials since they were legalized here last year.

The speaker, 45, a likely candidate in next year’s mayoral race, wed corporate lawyer Catullo, 45, in Chelsea before a megawatt gallery of political superstars, ranging from Mayor Bloomberg to Gov. Cuomo.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2disgusting4words; gaymarriage; homosexualagenda; kenyanbornmuzzie; newyork; newyorkcity; pervertpower; perverts; swrdswllwngsdshw; tunafish

1 posted on 05/19/2012 5:54:43 PM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
Kinda makes it hard to care whether AQ destroys NYC or not.
2 posted on 05/19/2012 5:57:32 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Well, so much for the evolution of marriage.. One is wearing the pants, I suppose this means she is the penetrator, and the other the recipient, and now HOW they expect to get pregnant and have children has yet to be proven they can naturally do this without some MALE genetic material being donated. This could be a Civil Union, a contract, but it aint HOLY MATRIMONY


3 posted on 05/19/2012 5:59:55 PM PDT by rovenstinez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Well, so much for the evolution of marriage.. One is wearing the pants, I suppose this means she is the penetrator, and the other the recipient, and now HOW they expect to get pregnant and have children has yet to be proven they can naturally do this without some MALE genetic material being donated. This could be a Civil Union, a contract, but it aint HOLY MATRIMONY


4 posted on 05/19/2012 6:00:02 PM PDT by rovenstinez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Well, so much for the evolution of marriage.. One is wearing the pants, I suppose this means she is the penetrator, and the other the recipient, and now HOW they expect to get pregnant and have children has yet to be proven they can naturally do this without some MALE genetic material being donated. This could be a Civil Union, a contract, but it aint HOLY MATRIMONY


5 posted on 05/19/2012 6:00:02 PM PDT by rovenstinez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

My daughter works in NYC. I told her that when she is told to leave “For God’s sake don’t look back!”


6 posted on 05/19/2012 6:01:40 PM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

If God doesn’t destroy NYC, LA, and SF......then He owes Sodom and Gomorrah HUGE apologies.


7 posted on 05/19/2012 6:05:56 PM PDT by RightOnline (I am Andrew Breitbart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Is anybody keeping track of how many righteous people are left in NYC?


8 posted on 05/19/2012 6:47:48 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123; Lazmataz

Laz may have issues with this....

9 posted on 05/19/2012 6:48:59 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

I heard once that a “lesbian” couple had one of them get pregnant so they could start a family. They used sperm from the brother of one of the girls, so that they would both have a genetic link to the child.

The whole area of childbearing may be a bridge too far for homosexual couples. In a traditional marriage, the baby is the biological child of both parents. In homosexual relationships, that becomes biologically impossible.


10 posted on 05/19/2012 6:53:09 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Which one has more testosterone?

11 posted on 05/19/2012 6:59:51 PM PDT by Slump Tester (What if I'm pregnant Teddy? Errr-ahh -Calm down Mary Jo, we'll cross that bridge when we come to it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123; All

Why are we surprised that a lesbian could possibly become Mayor on New York? Houston elected a Lesbian mayor. The sad part was this: At her inauguration, Joel Osteen offered the invocation and praised the lesbian witch to high heaven.

These are days that try men’s souls.


12 posted on 05/19/2012 7:45:19 PM PDT by no dems (TED CRUZ: A PROVEN CONSERVATIVE FOR U.S. SENATE FROM TEXAS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

They are men haters. Why would such sexism be glorified? It is hateful of half of the human race.....disgusting. But Marxists want to make women hate men to destroy the future—particularly create emotionally confused and stressed children—who can be enslaved easily. Trying to delete the male race-—without which we will all be slaves in the One World Government.

Real Men have made America and made us free. Step up men—and don’t let these Marxists destroy the only institution which unites men and women and is the best proven way to raise children-—The reason we have Just Law—so that we are allowed to do our DUTY and RAISE all our biological children. It is for the General Welfare of the children and future that marriage has to be between one woman and one man. It is Natural Law—basis of our legal system.


13 posted on 05/19/2012 8:39:32 PM PDT by savagesusie (Right Reason According to Nature = Just Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

From here, they are NO, NO and NO. (left to right in the photo)

A No hitter is pitched.


14 posted on 05/19/2012 8:55:34 PM PDT by Surrounded_too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: no dems

And who said Osteen was really a Bible Believing Christian pastor??


15 posted on 05/19/2012 9:47:03 PM PDT by JSDude1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Slump Tester

The microphone of course!


16 posted on 05/19/2012 9:59:36 PM PDT by samadams2000 (Someone important make......The Call!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

“For just one day, Christine Quinn wasn’t the speaker — she was the bride.”

Notice how the writer said “the bride” rather than “one of the brides”? Even there, the libs are (unintentionally, I’m sure) paying deference to the created order. There can only be one bride and one groom. Without one, it isn’t marriage in the eyes of God.


17 posted on 05/20/2012 12:13:02 PM PDT by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
try doing that in a muslim country, Mrs. Speaker.

***

I actually think she'd be very pretty if she lost weight and stopped using steroids.

18 posted on 05/20/2012 6:15:04 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (they have no god but caesar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson