Skip to comments.Obama's secrets will come out in this Election
Posted on 05/21/2012 4:36:22 AM PDT by no dems
The legacy of the 2008 campaign was the code of omerta enforced by the the legacy media about anything having to do with Obamas past. Where was he born? Dont care. What were his college years like? Cant you move on to something important, like the time Mitt Romney ragged some hippie in high school? Why did Obama say that former Weatherman Bill Ayers was just a guy in the neighborhood when he was plainly an important political mentor, if not also the ghostwriter, for the future president?
There are a lot of questions to be asked about Barack Obama. Why are his college records sealed? Why cant we see a certified copy of his birth certificate? Why are his medical records sealed? Ive been told that his Social Security registration was issued by Connecticut, which would be odd, but cannot check because that too is sealed. Obama worked as a lawyer, but we dont know who he worked for because his client list is sealed. Why is it that Michelle Obama can no longer practice as an attorney? We know the fact but not the reason.
General infatuation guaranteed that Obama got more or less a free pass from the legacy media. I suspect there will be much more curiosity as the summer progresses and we get into the campaign. He is no longer the pristine knight come to lower the oceans, fix the economy, and fundamentally transform the United States of America into a green paradise where everyone suckles happily at the federal mammary gland except the evil coal producers who are miserable bankrupts. No, I suspect that even The Washington Post, even The New York Times, will have to take a peek or two under the covers of the tale of this international man of mystery.
(Excerpt) Read more at times247.com ...
I remember hearing an interview with candidate Obama before he was a pResidential candidate. The discussion was about the Constitution. In this interview, he rambled on about fairness, equality, how it is a ‘living’ document, etc. but the one comment that stuck with me is his comment about the need to evolve it to a mandate for more “redistributive” equity.......
The author has a great deal more confidence in NYT and WaPo than I have. Both papers appear to have decided that they are dying, and that it's more profitable to become shills for the far left than to attempt to investigate or to present news honestly. Maintaining their credibility and professionalism would require investments that are not being made. Milking their residual reputation will allow them to have a disproportionate influence on those lacking in critical thinking skills, as their unmeasurable "good will" fades much more slowly than their integrity has.
During a NPR interview he specifically stated he rejects the Constitution because it limits the power of the Federal govt.
I heard that interview. I believe he called the Constitution “imperfect” in that it limits what government can do (as he’s clearly demonstrated his lack of respect for it during his entire term).
This ingrate is a disgusting POS, and America will have a tough time erasing what he’s done and removing the stain he’s imprinted on its fabric.
My fondest dream is to be awake long enough on election night and hear the lamentations of the various media sychophants over his LOSS!
I swear, I’m gonna “Arab Street” my celebration. I’m gonna ululate as loud as I can. I even have a bunch of dog-training poppers that I’m gonna use for what’s called ‘celebratory fire’ ala the Arab Street. Hell, I might even make a trip to Alabama and spend about $500 bucks for some fireworks! Then I’m gonna get drunk.
You are not alone in these sentiments. I wish I had enough money to join Saverin overseas.
He gets or doesn’t get that the Constitution deliberately limited the power of fed govt
No they won’t! Sad but true......evil likes evil.
"a charter of negative liberties. It says what the states can't do to you. Says what the federal government can't do to you but doesn't say what the federal government or state government must do on your behalf."And poor boob Obama. The Constitution doesn't say what the states can't do to you. And, outside the Bill of Rights, it doesn't say what the federal government can't do to you. It simply enumerates the limited powers of the federal government. The 10th Amendment makes this even more explicit by stating that anything not in the Constitution is left for the states and the people.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
I just pretended to be, to get into Columbia and Harvard."
I was thinking about what Romney will do to win and whether or not he'll mirror McCain
by listening to the RINO talking heads. Already there are discussions on FOX directed at
Romney and how he's not being "SWEET" (my word) enough.
Makes me sick.
And Rove needs to be fired from FOX since all he's looking for is another pampered
meal ticket into the white house.
barack was complaining that the Constitution limits what government can do to the American people.
And his media was silent.
My 2 cents here, I think the major media outlets were bought off.
They were in dinosaur territory and have continued to lose consumers ever since, but very few have laid off any of their people.
George Soros was spreading a lot of money around to support obama.
This may be a tinfoil hat thing here, but I think the media was told to fall in line and their financial worries would go away. The media is a bunch of leftys, but it didn’t make sense that they would outright campaign for an avowed marxist.
“My fondest dream is to be awake long enough on election night and hear the lamentations of the various media sychophants over his LOSS!”
A dream of mine also. Just to see the expressions on their faces as they give us the state results, seeing doom for their man a few hours away.
The secrets can come out ‘til the cows come home, but Americans couldn’t care less. Of course they matter to conservatives, but to the electorate as a whole, none of it resonates as to why it should matter.
Most voters care about whether they’re getting their piece of the pie. They comprehend little else.
I’ll definitely be celebrating a Obama loss however, it is my hope that I’ll be celebrating a Senate takeover and a Congress flush with new, conservative faces. While I absolutely agree that Obama is a POS and h done innumerable damage to this Country, he didn’t do it alone; the cabal on both sides have transformed this Country into a semblance of what it once was.
No, I suspect that even The Washington Post, even The New York Times, will have to take a peek or two under the covers of the tale of this international man of mystery.
Don't bet on it, Roger.
The media IS Marxist - as far back as Josef Stalin correctly labeling the NYT as his "Useful Idiots".
Obama needs to vetted with a vengeance and Romney needs to shut his pie hole over opposing it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.