Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bayouranger

There’s a lot of irony in this story that the writer seems blissfully unaware of.

The term ‘Asian’ in the UK is used to describe peoples of South Asian descent, ie India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and to a lesser extent Afghans. The reason the press uses this term is because the above mentioned races insisted on it! ‘Asian’ is the politically correct term chosen by British citizens of south Asian descent to replace Pakistani, Bangladeshi and so on when the overly sensitive amongst their number considered these terms to racially ‘delicate’.

So now the press use the cover all term Asian rather than refering to the country of origin or indeed their religion, but only because that is what was demanded.


10 posted on 05/22/2012 7:47:06 AM PDT by Caulkhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Caulkhead
The term ‘Asian’ in the UK is used to describe peoples of South Asian descent, ie India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and to a lesser extent Afghans.

Even when limited to the Subcontinent, "Asian" is hardly a racial term. There are dozens of races in the region--Tamils, Nagas, Punjabis, Sherpas, etc. Winston Churchill once commented that making India into a nation-state would be like turning the equator into a nation-state.

13 posted on 05/22/2012 8:03:36 AM PDT by Fiji Hill (Deo Vindice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson