Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Facebook could destroy the U.S. economy (Tulips anyone?)
MarketWatch ^ | 05/22/12 | Paul Farrell

Posted on 05/22/2012 7:35:57 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway

Facebook just joined a “troubled club,” warns the Economist. Now it’s just another “endangered public company.”

Yes, endangered. The number of public companies has declined 37% since 1997. The number of IPOs has dropped from 311 annually before 2000 to 99 the past decade. Meanwhile, the smart CEOs and the Super Rich are “going private,” to avoid government red tape restricting capitalism.

Reuters Over at BusinessWeek they’re warning investors that the growing number of “cutesy mascots” is a dangerous reminder “of the dot-com boom’s irrational exuberance.” They’re also red flagging new reports that “more Chinese investors are betting on U.S. start-ups.” And feeding the flames.

What’s going on? Facebook’s in trouble, that’s what. Now in the crosshairs of public scrutiny, everybody’s taking potshots. And the warnings are just beginning:

(Excerpt) Read more at marketwatch.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Unclassified
KEYWORDS: economy; facebook
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
The hype was ridiculous! All those instant millionaires had to sell to someone on Friday...John Q. Public stepped right up!...
1 posted on 05/22/2012 7:36:05 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

Wall Street’s term for retail investors is ‘dumb money’.


2 posted on 05/22/2012 7:41:56 AM PDT by thethirddegree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

Does anyone really care about Facebook’s finances except those who got suckered this week. The “owner” and his insiders got their money plus. At least they’re happy.


3 posted on 05/22/2012 7:43:27 AM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freeangel

I’m glad I missed that boat...


4 posted on 05/22/2012 7:45:01 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

I guess Mark Suckerberg is crying all the way to the bank..............


5 posted on 05/22/2012 7:52:54 AM PDT by Red Badger (Think logically. Act normally.................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

Exactly! How stupid did you have to be to buy Facebook shares on the day of the IPO? Who didn’t know the price would be inflated?


6 posted on 05/22/2012 7:54:54 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AngelesCrestHighway
I am by no means a savvy investor, but even I could see that the whole Facebook IPO was way, way over hyped and the share prices just paralleled the hype. That too seemed obvious.
7 posted on 05/22/2012 7:55:34 AM PDT by Obadiah (2008: Hope & Change -- 2012: Fear & Retribution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thethirddegree

Wall Street will never change. Sounding like the old pump and dump routine to me...


8 posted on 05/22/2012 8:02:52 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AngelesCrestHighway
As long as no tax payer money is involved, I don't care.

9 posted on 05/22/2012 8:02:52 AM PDT by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BitWielder1

I agree. I don’t care but it’s buyer beware...


10 posted on 05/22/2012 8:04:00 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AngelesCrestHighway
[Could Facebook be a] Global economy-killer? Yes...

...Yes folks, Facebook is that dangerous to our economy and to the global economy.

Oh, Bull$4!!. Obozo is far more dangerous. Indeed, a President with even a basic understanding of Econ 101 could turn this whole economic engine around in a heartbeat. (Gees, almost any of us could take a four year nap and do a better job of running the country.) If stupid is reelected (I'd worry about that NC teacher reading this, but I'm not sure she can read), I pray for this Republic.

11 posted on 05/22/2012 8:10:11 AM PDT by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

Tulip bulb prices got run WAY UP before they crashed. Facebook never got that chance...


12 posted on 05/22/2012 8:12:29 AM PDT by null and void (Day 1218 of our ObamaVacation from reality [and what dark chill/is gathering still/before the storm])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

who knows...$44 dollars a share may have been way up...we shall see


13 posted on 05/22/2012 8:14:52 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AngelesCrestHighway
[Could Facebook be a] Global economy-killer? Yes...

...Yes folks, Facebook is that dangerous to our economy and to the global economy.

Oh, Bull$4!!. Obozo is far more dangerous. Indeed, a President with even a basic understanding of Econ 101 could turn this whole economic engine around in a heartbeat. (Gees, almost any of us could take a four year nap and do a better job of running the country.) If stupid is reelected (I'd worry about that NC teacher reading this, but I'm not sure she can read), I pray for this Republic.

14 posted on 05/22/2012 8:16:17 AM PDT by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econjack

Agree with your post.


15 posted on 05/22/2012 8:17:10 AM PDT by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

Surprise, surprise. Facebook makes no money and someone pays $45.00 a share to say they own Facebook.

Today Facebook drops to $30.00 a share and that person who paid 45 bucks just got a major league haircut.

Fools are still being born every minute.


16 posted on 05/22/2012 8:19:28 AM PDT by Presbyterian Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econjack

Sorry for the double-post.


17 posted on 05/22/2012 8:22:03 AM PDT by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BitWielder1
As long as no tax payer money is involved, I don't care.

Let's just hope that Morgan Stanley (the underwriter for the IPO) doesn't need a bailout!

18 posted on 05/22/2012 8:24:12 AM PDT by Tallguy (It's all 'Fun and Games' until somebody loses an eye!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Presbyterian Reporter

Ditto...


19 posted on 05/22/2012 8:34:34 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

Often stocks are valued by popularity, as if they were in a voting machine.

Later, reality sets in, and the value is based on earnings; a weighing machine.

The wizard of Omaha, Warren Buffet said this.

Facebook is makeing the transition. A little quicker than usual.


20 posted on 05/22/2012 8:38:37 AM PDT by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson