Donate Just One Monthly
And Become a FR Hero
Sponsors will contribute $10
For each new monthly sign-up
Posted on 05/22/2012 9:14:44 PM PDT by Beaten Valve
A Hawaii official announced late Tuesday that the state gave Arizona’s top elections official the verification he wanted showing President Barack Obama was indeed born there in 1961.
The announcement came just hours after Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett backed away from his threats to keep Obama off the November ballot and apologized for embarrassing his own state with a conspiracy theory-fueled investigation into whether the president was really a natural born U.S. citizen.
It also followed weeks of back and forth between Hawaii and Arizona, with Hawaii officials saying they weren’t sure Bennett was qualified to be investigating the matter.
Here’s the full statement Joshua Wisch, the special assistant to the Hawaii attorney general, released at 11:35 p.m. ET:
(Excerpt) Read more at livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com ...
Unless you are adopted and then you can only get hold of the BC created by the court for the adoptee parents. Birth records are sealed.
Wonder what Corsi brought with him in his carry on. Is it posible they have a photo copy of a BC used by BSO for school records or little league or whatever? hmmmm?
I still hold that nobama was hatched (like the reptile he is)rather than born. That is the sticking point.
Set up .... I hope so.
After HDOH confirms the number of the BC, wouldn’t it be wonderful if that BC came into the public realm under a different name ....
This seems fishy to me. He had planned a press conference to talk about the issue. Now he supposedly has “proof” that Obama was born in Hawaii (bearing in mind that Deputy HI AG Jill Nagamine considered a documentably-falsified birth index sufficient “proof” that Obama was born in Hawaii...) that’s supposed to get all these demanding e-mailers off his back and yet he’s not even going to hold a press conference to take questions on what happened?
No, something is definitely fishy here.
We’ll see what statement he makes today, but I want to see the communications showing what change he made to his request and I want to see exactly what they gave him.
Mr Rogers, you’re in AZ. Do you have any idea how to go about requesting copies of the communications between Bennett and HI officials?
We already know they’ve manipulated their database in the past, so anything they “verify” based on their database is worthless. Then again, if Corsi truly has a source from within the HDOH who noted when a forgery was placed in the files, then anything they “verify” based on that forgery is worthless also.
I think Arpaio has it right. No matter how you slice it, the only way anything the HDOH says can be credible at this point is if they allow an audit - which would require at least the microfilms and computer transaction logs.
Basically what a “verification” does is makes whoever did the verifying legally liable for perjury if/when it is shown to be false. Then again, if they’ve got a forged BC in their files, they could claim they didn’t know it was forged.
The computer transaction logs would show who did what with the database. Those transaction logs are supposed to be discloseable - except that the HDOH claims that disclosure would frustrate a legitimate government function. Meaning that a moron like me could figure out how to hack their system. The same reason Okubo originally claimed it was critical for the BC# to be redacted. Yeah, right. Every COLB they print out has a BC# that could cause their whole system to be hacked...
If the people who “verified” a Hawaii birth for Obama were charged with perjury they would have to prove that they didn’t know it was a forgery. The reasonable way for them to know whether it was or wasn’t a forgery would be by looking at the original security microfilms. Anything less than that would be negligent, given the suspicions publicly expressed.
See #126. Very strange that nobody else is reporting this.
Here is a pickable link (opens in new screen)...@www.capitol.hawaii.gov - /hrscurrent/Vol06_Ch0321-0344/HRS0338/
Here is the timeline for - §338-18 Disclosure of records
[L 1949, c 327, §22; RL 1955, §57-21; am L Sp 1959 2d, c 1, §19; am L 1967, c 30, §2; HRS §338-18; am L 1977, c 118, §1; am L 1991, c 190, §1; am L 1997, c 305, §5; am L 2001, c 246, §2]
So since at least 1949 there have been restrictions in Hawaii on disclosure.
Help me out here with your assertion. What decade were you talking about?
And I'm taking this whole "he canceled" thing with a grain of salt.
The MSM would be all over this if there were something to the story, just like they were last night with the article I linked to.
Patience is a virtue and I'm willing to wait and see what develops.
Not in all States. The laws vary from State to State.
Here is the Hawaiian law concerning who is allowed access to vital records.
Before the primaries we made the case.
They said it wasn't the right time because he wasn't actually his party's candidate.
Before the main election we made the case.
They said it wasn't the right time because he wasn't actually the president elect.
Before the electoral college vote we made the case.
They said it wasn't the right time because he hadn't actually been elected until the electoral college said so.
Before the congress accepted the electoral college vote we made the case.
They said it wasn't the right time because he hadn't actually been approved until the congress accepted the electoral college vote.
Before was sworn in we made the case.
They said it wasn't the right time because he hadn't actually violated the constitution until he became president.
Now that he is in the White House, they say it's too late, you should have said something sooner!
(originally posted 10/30/2009)
I had a “battle” with some TPM diciples, many there really “educated” Marxister with red flag and sicle, totally ignorant about the Constitution’s Article 2. Section 1. They are brainwashed as to SAD a U.S. citizen so is Barry under any circumstanses. To go there is like going to DU, you need a shower after!!!
The law hasn't been changed since 2001.
LOL!
Nicely painted.
My only hope is that Sheriff Arpaio has more up in his sleves than we know about. Sending Mark Zullo, a PI and Dr. Corsi half the way around the globe seems to tell me there’s far more to come. Hopefully they can “pry” their way in to see and inspect visually what Hawaii is sending Bennett from their “archive”???
However, we thought we had Bill Clinton cornered w/impeachment, but he scatted and now part of this whole problem being threathened!!!
Also being able to intervene in the dead baby b.c. case and get their foot into the hospital as well while they are there???
Fox News "Latino" (whatever that is, Mexican?). Anyone have the American Fox News version?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.