Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hawaii Verifies Obama’s Birth For Arizona Secretary Of State
Talking Points Memo ^ | May 22, 2012 | Nick Martin

Posted on 05/22/2012 9:14:44 PM PDT by Beaten Valve

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-216 last
To: Beaten Valve

SHOW US THE LONG FORM WHICH REVEALS THE DEFACTO PLACE OF BIRTH OF BARRACK HUSSEIN OBAMA !


201 posted on 05/23/2012 1:57:46 PM PDT by Candor7 (Obama fascist info....http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion
But I would think that the actual re-worded request must have been e-mailed. That’s what we need to see.
If such a re-worded e-mail exists I'm willing to bet that the good folks in Surprise will unearth it in due course.
202 posted on 05/23/2012 2:22:00 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: philman_36
Note also that he didn't say that the CLB attached was "the real deal" and only that the information matched.

Indicating that? LoL.

Translations - yeah, "indicating" forgery. Indicating it matches the information of recent amendments submitted by Obama.

Indicating granny Dunham's "honest" statement, which is noted in a dusty book found by Abercommie that Obama was birf'd in Hawaii.

Yup, indicating.

203 posted on 05/23/2012 5:10:40 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: BigGuy22

We obviously aren’t worthy of seeing the damned thing, just have to take their word that it exists.


204 posted on 05/23/2012 5:26:32 PM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
"I hope it" stands up to future scrutiny since Hawaii has now crossed the Rubicon or is that Con?"

Well, since the "document" is an electronic fabrication, I suppose you could refer to is as Rube E-Con. ;)

205 posted on 05/23/2012 5:27:26 PM PDT by Flotsam_Jetsome (If not you, who? If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]


206 posted on 05/23/2012 5:31:22 PM PDT by RedMDer (https://support.woundedwarriorproject.org/default.aspx?tsid=93)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

“We obviously aren’t worthy of seeing the damned thing, just have to take their word that it exists.”
__

I’m not sure what you mean. Should we all be permitted to line up single file and see it for ourselves at the Department of Health in Honolulu?

A certified photocopy of it, with a stamp and seal, was passed around and photographed at the 4/27/2011 press conference; everyone who reported on it, including Les Kinsolving, agreed that’s what happened. Uncertified copies were distributed freely to members of the press in attendance, and a PDEF of it was (and is) posted online.

You’re not required to believe it exists, of course, but it seems strange to claim that it’s because “[w]e obviously aren’t worthy of seeing the damned thing.”


207 posted on 05/23/2012 6:00:46 PM PDT by BigGuy22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: BigGuy22

We saw a digitally created, poorly done forgery, very much different from a scan of an original document.


208 posted on 05/23/2012 7:26:16 PM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion; philman_36

According to the release of the Hawaiian document as being forgery. I think it was/is a very smart move of Sheriff Arpaio to send Mark Zullo, and PI and tag on Dr. Corsi to Hawaii to walk on the lava Island in person to get a first hand feeling of what HDOH and others there are up to!

Mark Zullo comes on very calm but also as a screwd investigator, alluding to that even some media crimps have been seriously threathening and looking for other jobs to get bread and butter on their tables!!

The Breitbarting would mostly have a great del to do with their decissions. They just have to go backward 2008 primary and the murder of Bill Gwatney and Bill Clinton then silenced and getting into the Al Capone’s of lock stepping. However, I feel those things are not intimidating Sheriff Joe Arpaio, may God protect his very actions for the good of our country!!!


209 posted on 05/23/2012 8:12:35 PM PDT by danamco (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: danamco

Bust 'em, Zullo!

210 posted on 05/23/2012 8:20:08 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: BigGuy22

The verification that Hawaii sent Arizona can be found here:

http://www.azcentral.com/12news/Obama-Verification.pdf


and Bennett is going t accept that as proof?????


211 posted on 05/23/2012 9:16:12 PM PDT by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

One question everyone should ask Bennett and DEMAND an answer :

In his original request, he requested that they verify that the attached copy of the BC was a “TRUE AND ACCURATE COPY” of what was on file with the DOH.

They answered that the information on that attached BC was the same as in their records on file. As any attorney knows Bennett, that is not the same thing.

Now, was the request for rewording from the Hawaii AG for you to drop the “TRUE AND ACCURATE COPY” portion ? If so, why did you do it and what does that suggest to you ?

If they did not suggest that change in wording, why did you accept their statement when you requested them to verify it as a TRUE AND ACCURATE COPY” ?

The fact that they would not verify it as such could only imply one thing – that it isn’t a true and accurate copy and what he presented online is a forgery.

So how can you , as SOS, put him on the ballot knowing that the copy of his BC he is presenting online is NOT a TRUE AND ACCURATE COPY and is a FORGERY ?


212 posted on 05/23/2012 11:09:38 PM PDT by TheCipher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome
I suppose you could refer to is as Rube E-Con. ;)

That's good. :-)

213 posted on 05/23/2012 11:28:51 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER; BigGuy22; LucyT; melancholy; Brown Deer; Ladysforest; Danae
We saw a digitally created, poorly done forgery, very much different from a scan of an original document.

We saw in the dim twilight a donkey wearing a lion's skin.

(nod to C.S Lewis)

214 posted on 05/23/2012 11:35:16 PM PDT by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: BigGuy22

If he was born in Hawaii, then the President is a POS lying f*ck—reference his publicist’s bio from 1991-2007.

If I were Boehner et al., I wouldn’t let a 24-hour media cycle go by without beating the drum of that bio. Obama has ABSOLUTELY been claiming a Kenyan birth, and in fact, he’s the original, “Birther.”


215 posted on 05/24/2012 4:06:18 AM PDT by dinodino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: Coronal; doc1019
97 posted on Wed May 23 2012 01:57:38 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time) by Coronal: “Where do you live, that anyone with the requisite fee can get a copy of anyone’s BC?”

State laws differ.

When I lived in Iowa, birth certificates were filed in the county courthouse in a record book that I checked weekly for new births. The newspaper I worked at wanted to print the names of all babies born in the county every week so we went and checked the birth certificates. Never had any problem. Just went into the vault, got out the book, and copied whatever I wanted from the birth certificates, marriage licenses, and divorce decrees.

Sometimes I got curious and when I had some extra time went into the really, really old records ... like the early 1800s. It was all there for anyone who wanted to look at it.

A birth certificate, marriage license, divorce decree, etc., is a public record unless sealed for reasons such as adoptions or custody disputes with juveniles.

If anyone tells you differently, ask them to show you statute law on the matter in your state.

216 posted on 05/24/2012 8:07:28 PM PDT by darrellmaurina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-216 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson