Posted on 05/23/2012 2:36:34 PM PDT by STARWISE
U.S. Attorney Patrick J. Fitzgerald — who toppled two Illinois governors and a top aide to the former vice president, and also went after the Chicago mob, a notorious police commander accused of torture and even international terrorists — is stepping down.
The corruption-busting prosecutor said he will leave the post June 30 after serving nearly 11 years in the post, longer than anyone else in Illinois history.
In a written statement, Fitzgerald said he told the White House, Attorney General Eric Holder, and U.S. Sens. Richard Durbin and Mark Kirk about his decision Wednesday morning.
“When I was selected for this position in 2001, I said that it was one of the greatest opportunities that one could ever hope for, and I believe that even more now after having the privilege of working alongside hundreds of dedicated prosecutors and agents,” he said in the statement. “I have tried not to get in their way. I extend my deepest appreciation to the attorneys and staff for their determined commitment to public service. This was a great office when I arrived, and I have no doubt that it will continue to be a great office.”
*snip*
Fitzgerald, 51, the father of two children, said he has no job lined up at this point and “will take time off this summer before considering career options.”
Durbin said Wednesday that Fitzgerald “kept his word” when he pledged not to show any political favoritism before taking the post on Sept. 1, 2001.
“His aggressive prosecution of wrongdoing — including politicians in both parties — has given fair warning that no one is above the law,” Durbin said in a statement. “Our nation is fortunate to have public servants of Patrick Fitzgerald’s caliber and integrity.”
Durbin will most likely follow a version of a cooperative arrangement he has used with Sen. Mark Kirk (R-Ill.) in selecting federal judges in recommending a nominee to replace Fitzgerald.
Clinton needed to get rid of the Arkansas AUSA who was looking into Whitewater. To camouflage this move Clinton fired about 80 others.
Soooo, Fitzy promised Dickie that he would prosecute Republicans.....
AMEN!!!
I suppose it's ironic how a corrupt scumbag like Durbin is probably the only person on earth who can keep a straight face when making the above statement about another corrupt scumbag.
That's not an issue. Romney, if elected, will likely follow precedent (since Clinton began the practice) and fire all US Attorneys, then reappoint and replace whoever he wants. Of course, liberal Democrat Romney could end up keeping the rats anyway.
I don't think so -- the essence of Mitten's campaign is, the other guy is an amateur who has appointed amateurs, so let's put an adult back in the office. You got to clean house from there.
Which is a reminder of another GWB failure - he failed to clean house.
Fizzy persecuted Scooter because he couldn't get to Rove, so he went for a neo-con from Cheney's cadre. Scooter copped the charge because (a) he had lousy lawyers and (b) he wanted the Judith Miller affair out of the news.
On August 28, 2006, Christopher Hitchens asserted that Richard Armitage was the primary source of the Valerie Plame leak and that Fitzgerald knew this at the beginning of his investigation.[131] This was supported a month later by Armitage himself, who stated that Fitzgerald had instructed him not to go public with this information.[132] Investor's Business Daily questioned Fitzgerald's truthfulness in an editorial, stating "From top to bottom, this has been one of the most disgraceful abuses of prosecutorial power in this country's history...The Plame case proves [Fitzgerald] can bend the truth with the proficiency of the slickest of pols."[133]
I don't think so -- the essence of Mitten's campaign is,the other guy is an amateur who has appointed amateurs,so let's put an adult back in the office. You got to clean house from there.
Has the Romney Campaign been asked this very question?
I thought he was great. Didn’t Bush appoint him? Why are we bashing a good Republican? Didn’t he get rid of a lot of corrupted people of both parties. I say God Bless him.
AG Fitzgerald went after Scooter, as the only scapegoat he could snare in a he-said-she-said perjury trap on the erroneous legal premise that the WH “went after” (sought to harm/damage) an individual - the husband of a CIA employee, by “intentionally revealing” the CIA employment aspect of his wife, in order to “cause harm” to an individual whose speech they sought to “suppress”. Nonsense.
The legal premise Fitz employed was wrong and erroneous on a number of counts.
(1) The nature of Ms Plame’s work was not first disclosed by the WH.
(2) What disclosures concerning her identity that did reach the public did not breach any Federal law, given the context of her work and previous disclosures of who she was.
(3) The WH did not “target”, did not “go after”, did not seek to “damage” or “harm” Ms Plame or her husband. The WH “went after” the erroneous story Ms Plame’s husband was telling about an investigation the CIA and State department had sent him on, the “evidence” that investigation produced and the government’s analysis of what was learned by that so-called “investigation”. The interpretation of all these points by Ms Plame’s husband were refuted and contradicted in Congressional testimony by the others in government actually involved in the affair. Ms Plame’s husband’s story was false and the WH had an obligation and responsibility to “go after” that story and refute it. In the process the CIA identity of Ms Plame’s employment was incidental, non-lethal, not illegal, collateral information made public first NOT by the WH or Scooter.
AG Fitz proved himself to be a self-aggrandizing thug seeking a name for himself in history. We can only hope history makes it a name of shame.
So is Obama going to appoint him to a federal judgeship before the end of the year?
My money is on “yes”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.