Skip to comments.Update 4: Hustler Publishes Fake Pornographic Picture of S. E. Cupp
Posted on 05/23/2012 7:29:11 PM PDT by neverdem
Update: Will S.E. Cupp sue?
Update 2: Commentary from The Blaze here (pictured obscured).
Update 3: Sandra Fluke, Planned Parenthood condemn.
Update 4: Hustler defends.
I’m not going to provide a link, but along with the picture Hustler added this disclaimer:
No such picture of S.E. Cupp actually exists. This composite fantasy picture was altered from the original for our imagination, does not depict reality and is not to be taken seriously for any purpose.
But just imagine for a second if Rush Limbaugh had gone this far. The Left would have gone nuclear.
I don’t expect S. E. Cupp will be hearing from President Obama anytime soon, however.
And if you’re on Twitter, search for #IStandWithSECupp for the latest.
It’s OK, this was DONE WHILE DEMOCRAT, so the mainstream media could care less.
“Its OK, this was DONE WHILE DEMOCRAT, so the mainstream media could care less.”
No, you are wrong. The mainstream media could NOT care less.
This is discusting! However, I just want to know where she bought her glasses.
OK, so if someone published, in a magazine, a photoshopped pornographic picture of Michelle Obama, or of Barry himself “playing catch”,
that should be OK, right?
There was a porno made about Sarah Palin and a nude painting of Canadian PM Harper just sold so yeah it should be ok but we know it wouldn’t because this is a leftist tactic against conservatives and not to be used against them.
It would be OK for Michelle, but not for Barack.
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell was a 1988 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held that the First Amendment protects parodies of public figures as long as they could not be reasonably taken as true.
I think it would be reasonable to think that 0bama might be a catcher...
That's what I was saying. The Hustler parodies are OK as long as they are totally unbelievable (such as Michelle as a sex object) but they are NOT OK if they are plausible (Barry "catching").
ah, gotcha... I was reading your post backwards.