Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Parents concerned about sexual behavior on preschool playground (Slaton, Texas)
KCBD Channel 11 ^ | 24 May 2012 | Natasha Sweatte

Posted on 05/24/2012 10:10:21 PM PDT by Army Air Corps

SLATON, TX (KCBD) - Parents at Stephen F. Austin in Slaton are concerned about their children's safety after a group of preschoolers displayed inappropriate behavior on the playground.

Superintendent Julee Becker confirmed that the incident did involve sexual behavior, but she says supervision levels on school grounds, especially on the playground, have been increased.

Several parents of students with disabilities called KCBD NewsChannel 11, worried that their kids would not be able to defend themselves if touched inappropriately.

Becker said the students involved were disciplined accordingly and says it was a one-time incident. Josie Dabila, grandparent of a Stephen F. Austin student said she witnessed several events of inappropriate sexual behavior on the playground. Becker says the increased supervision will prevent events like this happening in the future.

Copyright 2012 KCBD. All rights reserved.


TOPICS: Government; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: arth; preschool; sexualbehavior
After several paragraphs, we still have no idea what the hell happened.
1 posted on 05/24/2012 10:10:29 PM PDT by Army Air Corps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

Monkey See, Monkey Do


2 posted on 05/24/2012 10:13:26 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (The best diplomat I know is a fully-activated phaser bank. - Montgomery Scott)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

Irony: When sex education is taught to younger and younger kids, and people are appalled when they actually try those things.


3 posted on 05/24/2012 10:14:03 PM PDT by wastedyears ("God? I didn't know he was signed onto the system.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps; metmom

{Ping to Metmom for the ARTH list... not a whole lot of solid information here, but the principal’s nonchalant attitude is extremely disconcerting, IMHO.]

A “one-time incident”, huh? Well, that makes it all better then, I guess... (NOT!!!) It only takes ONE TIME to scar a child for life.

As for saying these children have been disciplined - what kind of discipline did they receive? Was this a case of “playing doctor” and have they now scarred the OTHER kids for life?

As for “increased supervision”? Yeah... that’s NOT going to work. I hope the school contacted social services about this in regards to the children who were behaving inappropriately (and no, I’m not one who casually suggests this sort of drastic action).

You’re dealing with 3 and 4 year-olds here. Depending on the specific sexual activity it could be a HUGE warning sign that the child leading the behavior is being abused.

Like you said though - it’s all speculation until someone talks about what really happened. I just had to say that the principal’s reaction, and the way they brushed it off like it was “no big thing” would make me EXTREMELY uneasy to let my child go back to that school. The victim has no rights in the school systems when this happens - even worse when you have parents of special needs students who are worried because the kids can’t defend themselves, and I’m guessing some couldn’t even communicate that they’d been hurt...


4 posted on 05/24/2012 10:27:58 PM PDT by LibertyRocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

Sex Education was introduced by the Cultural Marxists to destroy morality and normalize abnormal behavior in children. There should be NO sex ed in schools-—in the seventies when it was introduced sexual activity increased and was directly connected to putting ideas of sexually acting out into their heads. They want to emulate adults...it is common sense. That is why parents are always discrete when around children. They copy what they see and hear especially if the adults are explaining how pleasant it is.

Sex Ed removes morality from the sex act and reduces it to a meaningless animal act. Children are too immature to deal with the information in a positive, mature way—they are immature by nature and tease and demean differences. It destroys any awe and mystery of the sex act which professionals say is necessary for normal sexual development. It makes children disgusted with the opposite sex—it demeans the intimacy of marriage and reduces sex to a group activity.

Sexual activity of teenagers went from less than 3% to 30 percent in a generation and now with media promoting sex and sexualizing children it is even higher-—we are talking about children 12 now—when it used to be zero for that age unless they were being sexually abused.

It is to corrupt children. Even Rousseau the father of Marxism and hippies-—whose infant kids were put into orphanages and died in their first year-—said that children’s innocence needs to be protected at least until puberty since once they are interested in sex all intellectual development is out the window and emotions become a big distraction.

Marxists want emotions—feel good, do it—taught in the schools—that is integrated into sex ed. It is to destroy the concept of Christian Ethics (God) and responsibility and Natural Laws so that Marxists can shape them into addicted stupid drones-—useful idiots for their mob acorn jobs.


5 posted on 05/24/2012 10:34:00 PM PDT by savagesusie (Right Reason According to Nature = Just Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

If they don’t explain what happened it’s hard to say anything about it. Little kids have been doing the “I’ll show you mine if you show me yours” since time began.


6 posted on 05/24/2012 10:53:44 PM PDT by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Little kids have been doing the “I’ll show you mine if you show me yours” since time began.


Not to mention running past & (boy) flipping up a skirt hem or (girl) jerking down on pants; then (all) chanting “teacher, teacher, I declare! I see ___’s underwear!”

These days, a hug or a smooch on the cheek is also well within most schools’ definitions of “sexual behavior” and “inappropriate touching”.

I’ll save my ranting until, and if, we’re given facts that warrant genuine, as opposed to PC, outrage.


7 posted on 05/24/2012 11:07:54 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (Love me, love my guns!©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

We’re they giving each other Wet Willies?


8 posted on 05/24/2012 11:17:38 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

I had to figure it out on my own


9 posted on 05/24/2012 11:18:10 PM PDT by woofie (It takes three villages and a forest of woodland creatures to raise a child in Obamaville)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ApplegateRanch

Well, we have no idea what happened in this story but our guesses have revealed the upside down hypocrisy of today’s social rules. Little kids are accused of inappropriate sexual conduct for normal curiosity and by the time they are ten they’re being pushed to learn every sexual perversion known to man and “experiment” with it.


10 posted on 05/24/2012 11:24:05 PM PDT by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

Liberal teachers foment lack of ethics and morals to ensure future generations of “DemocRAT” voters!


11 posted on 05/24/2012 11:27:29 PM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps; 2Jedismom; 6amgelsmama; AAABEST; aberaussie; AccountantMom; Aggie Mama; agrace; ...

ANOTHER REASON TO HOMESCHOOL

This ping list is for the “other” articles of interest to homeschoolers about education and public school. This can occasionally be a fairly high volume list. Articles pinged to the Another Reason to Homeschool List will be given the keyword of ARTH. (If I remember. If I forget, please feel free to add it yourself)

The main Homeschool Ping List handles the homeschool-specific articles. I hold both the Homeschool Ping List and the Another Reason to Homeschool Ping list. Please freepmail me to let me know if you would like to be added to or removed from either list, or both.

Becker says the increased supervision will prevent events like this happening in the future.

Wonder what she's been smoking.....

Oh, what a Brave New World we live in.....

12 posted on 05/24/2012 11:33:33 PM PDT by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: woofie

I’m still not sure I’ve got it right.....


13 posted on 05/24/2012 11:34:19 PM PDT by JoeDetweiler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks
You’re dealing with 3 and 4 year-olds here. Depending on the specific sexual activity it could be a HUGE warning sign that the child leading the behavior is being abused.

Exactly. Kids that age should have no concept of sexual behavior. They HAD TO have learned it somewhere.

14 posted on 05/24/2012 11:37:00 PM PDT by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

Let’s see. Maybe a boy hugged a girl? Maybe, like my son, he called a girl a princess. Maybe it was natural curiosity about their bodies. In any case I can guarantee it’s complete over reaction by the school.


15 posted on 05/25/2012 2:51:32 AM PDT by raybbr (People who still support Obama are either a Marxist or a moron.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks

Perhaps, the new standard is this:

Was it more or less ‘intense’ than a TSA pat-down?

[/s]


16 posted on 05/25/2012 5:12:04 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

When I was 5 I learned what a male organ looked like (I had no brothers) because 2-1/2 year old little Tony from down the street would pull his out when ever and where ever he had “go”.

What this article fails to state is if this is normal preschool curiosity hyperbolized, or if it goes beyond this.

I’d bet that little Tony would be labeled a sexual deviant for taking a leak.


17 posted on 05/25/2012 5:34:06 AM PDT by KosmicKitty (WARNING: Hormonally crazed woman ahead!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

I was born in Slayton Tx.

not much to do up there.


18 posted on 05/25/2012 6:38:55 AM PDT by Rightly Biased (How do you say Arkanicide in Kenyan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KosmicKitty

What you say is not unusual.

The real problem with this story is that we really have no idea what happened/ What, precisely, was the “sexual activity”?


19 posted on 05/25/2012 7:03:19 AM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Correct. We have no idea what the “sexual activity” was. It could have been as simple as a kid being “pantsed” by another kid or the scenario you mentioned. Who knows.


20 posted on 05/25/2012 7:06:25 AM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Rightly Biased

There still isn’t much to do there.


21 posted on 05/25/2012 7:09:18 AM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

Maybe some child was abused and that is why a sex act was occurring among preschoolers.

It could also be a child inappropriately sexualized by their parent having sex (with the other parent or a string of men) in front of the child. If the parent is drunk or just thinks the kid is asleep or whatever. Kids should not be sexualized in that way either.


22 posted on 05/25/2012 7:09:55 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps; metmom; MrB

“Sexual behavior on the playground” was reason enough for us to decide to homeschool. Haven’t looked back since and have urged many friends to follow.


23 posted on 05/25/2012 7:11:24 AM PDT by Sopater (...where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty. - 2 COR 3:17b)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeDetweiler

LOL


24 posted on 05/25/2012 8:18:47 AM PDT by woofie (It takes three villages and a forest of woodland creatures to raise a child in Obamaville)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson