Trump: A boost or detriment to Romney? (Video - Greta Sustern Interviews Trump about Obama's BC)

Fox ^ | May 29th, 2012 | Greta Van Sustern

[hoosiermama]

Listened last night...thought Greta sounded like an attorney who knew her client was guilty but was trying to get witness to say otherwise.

Whether The Donald is informed or not he certainly is getting attention.

Thinking of this as a company: Arpaio in charge of Research; Corsi, distribution; a gaggle of lawyers, development & quality control; Trump marketing.

BUT unlike any other company, they all do a bit of everything with no organization and the goal hazy at best...No one knows who this person REALLY is.

[Qwackertoo]

I caught most of the interview . . . and not once did either mention NBC or his father not being an American citizen. It was a total waste of time. But I did like how he kept saying, you are the one who brought it up, Greta, NOT me.

[Georgia Girl 2]

The Donald will drive those Dem libtards insane. I am loving it. He gives them back a dose of their own medicine.

[353FMG]

What about Hussein’s lawyers?

Can they be held responsible for perpetuating an act of national deception, or are they above the law in that the truth does not have to be part of their defense of Obama?

I know, I know, someone with the name of Pilate already asked, some 2000 years ago: “What is truth?”.

[edge919]

That’s a good question, but the answer would be based on who would hold those lawyers accountable?? Congress?? The Department of Justice??

[NJ_Tom]

2. For this reason: Remember how Obama released a forged document purporting to be his long form birth certificate last April 2011 because of the pressure from Trump and others to do so?

There, fixed it.

[john mirse]

So what's to stop them from releasing phony school records too?

********

Occidental and Columbia: I would want for Obama to give Occidental and Columbia officials permission to release Obama's transcript directly to the news media.

That is, I don't want Occidental and Columbia officials to releases the transcripts first to Obama, who, in turn, would release them to the public.

If Occidental and Columbia, Obama's undergraduate schools, want to release doctored transcripts, and it is discovered many years later that they released doctored transcripts, then Occidental and Columbia officials and students will have to live with their treachery and shame for all time.

Just wondering: Why did Obama choose Occidental in California in the first place?

1. I read somewhere that Obama said he was following a girl he met who either lived in California or was a student there.

2. But why Occidental, a prestigious private college, a college that was not cheap even in the 1970s and 1980s, when there were so many other colleges----probably some even cheaper than Occidental---to choose from in Southern California?

3. Also, as I understand it, the first time Obama stepped foot on the Occidental campus was the day he registered for classes, which means that he didn't take a tour of Occidental before he decided to go to school there.

4. Many college students see their colleges for the first time when they show up for classes, but I wonder why Obama happened to choose Occidental sight unseen.

5. I also wonder if Obama applied to other colleges in Southern California, and if he did, which ones.

6. Is the main reason that Obama chose Occidental over other colleges in California be this one: Occidental offered the best financial help for those persons who applied as foreign students? Just some food for thought.