Orrin Hatch Opponent Dan Liljenquist Supports Raising Taxes (Video)

Conseratives4Palin ^ | Wednesday May 30, 2012 | Steve Fisher

[Bigtigermike]

Dan Liljenquist’s campaign has stated that he would never label himself a “Tea Party” candidate, and now we see why.

[Bigtigermike]

According to Dan he may work with Democrats about possible "Revenue Enhancers" if elected

[Bratch]

Direct link to YouTube video.

Dan Liljenquist says he supports increasing taxes

[Bigtigermike]

Thanks

[2ndDivisionVet]

So Sarah Palin was right, again?

[HiTech RedNeck]

Lil-jen (or yen?)-kwist.

That’s a light in the loafers name

[Bigtigermike]

Yes she was right and she knows what she’s doing.....those people jumping on her look like fools now

[Terry Mross]

How many so called “tea party” candidates are really GOPe plants who blow it right before the election?

[Sarah Barracuda]

So Sarah Palin gets trashed by some for supporting Hatch yet it turns out his opponent is for raising taxes.Not like Hatch was perfect but he seems to be the lesser of two evils here..Sarah knows what she is doing when she makes endorsements, looks like she was right yet again

[Tex-Con-Man]

Mark Levin has been solidly behind Hatch and making a passionate, full throated defense for his re-election. His argument is partly that this guy is being called the “Tea Party” candidate without any real proof. And he pointed out this guy was already negotiating away new taxes before he even got to DC.

[Paladin2]

Campaign Killer.

It's surprising that S! may be correct on this race.

[Jane Long]

Sarah and Mark are doing great with their endorsements.

[tennmountainman]

I guess Dan hasn’t studied history very much.
EVERY tax increase on the American public has been spent supporting larger and larger federal spending.

In addition, these “Grand Bargains” are the reason this once great country is on the verge of collapse...
Decades of “compromise” has got this country on the verge
of collapse.
No thanks Dan. We know where “compromise” leads to.
A bankrupt nation.

[Sarah Barracuda]

I wonder if the same people who called Sarah a RINO(Without even looking at the evidence as to WHY she endorsed Hatch) will apologize. Mark Levin is a great voice for Conservatism, even HE supports Hatch, no one bothered to see why, instead just dumping on Sarah like she was the bad guy. I dont always agree with every endorsement she does but I understand why she does it

[Bigtigermike]

Someone pointed out that many of those trashing Sarah about the Hatch endorsement on some conservative sites were not Tea Party supporters or even Sarah supporters but were trolls or haters of Palin by their profile where they commented on other sites.....the rest were just ignorant conservatives

[Sarah Barracuda]

Not sure about other sites since this is the only Conservative site I go on(Other than C4P of course) there were the usual Palin bashers trashing her of course, but were silent when mention of Mark Levin supporting Hatch was mentioned

[TWhiteBear]

Another wise choice by Governor Sarah Palin.
She is one smart cookie and unmasked a lot of her critics who are now tied to supporting a tax raiser.
TWB

[Tex-Con-Man]

Unfortunately there’s a small group of FR zealots who can't get past...

tea party=good
incumbent=bad

Each case is different...in this one, Hatch seems the better of the 2.

[BillyBoy]

I'm not switching my support to Hatch (he generally votes the right way but he is a old GOP establishment guy who should have left the Senate YEARS ago!), but I've had serious qualms about this Dan Liljenquist guy, and this latest story just confirms it. The comments from the most gung-ho Liljenquist fanboys in Utah are even more troubling. I'm pretty much only supporting Liljenquist because Hatch needs to go, but it's a real hold-your-nose choice. Chaffetz would have been a much better opponent for Hatch. Bottom line: I do NOT trust this guy.

[woofie]

And how many freepers were wrong?

[okie01]

I do NOT trust this guy.

Then, why support him?

You say Hatch "has to go". At the price of electing somebody you don't trust?

And, after this term, won't Hatch be gone anyway?

I confess that I don't understand...