[kearnyirish2]

“But a bill that contains some of what you want, even though it’s not all you want, does not necessarily make it a bad bill, IMO.”

If you find it preferable to have male children murdered while limiting the right to murder females, then I don’t know “what you want”. If having that somehow is a good thing, I’m on the wrong planet.

The fact is that as our standard of living falls to that of Asian peasants, people see less purpose in reproducing; when they see no purpose in reproducing they see no need for females.

[PapaNew]

Oskar Schindler rescued 1,200 Jewish people from death at the hands of the Nazis and their death camps. Did he wish all the Jews could be saved? Yes. Did he bitterly regret not saving more? Yes. Does that mean he that he thought it was a "good thing" for the rest to be killed? Of course not. He did whatever he could to save those lives he could.

Paul the apostle said, "To the weak became I as weak, that I might gain the weak: I am made all things to all men, that I might by all means save some." 1 Corinthians 9:22.

I see nothing wrong with trying to save as many as possible unless or until such a time as all can be saved.