Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Daily Kos Week in Review: Nasty Rich Boys Don't Ever Change
News Buster.com ^ | June 1, 2012 | Tom Johnson

Posted on 06/02/2012 8:55:54 AM PDT by Kaslin

Remember when conservatives didn't like or trust Mitt Romney? Well, that's yesterday's news, according to one Kossack, who opined that the right is warming to Romney because of his vicious, mendacious attacks on President Obama. Moreover, the same Kossack declared that righties find lies about Obama not only politically congenial but also sexually arousing.
 
As usual, each headline is preceded by the blogger's name or pseudonym.

Daily Kos Week in Review will return in two weeks.
 
Jed Lewison: Mitt's still a bully
 
...America's right is falling in love with Mitt Romney...
 
...[T]hese conservatives are realizing that Mitt Romney, Cranbook's senior bully, and Mitt Romney, 2012 Republican nominee, are one and the same—and they'd love nothing more than to see Eric Fehrnstrom pin President Obama to the floor as Willard shaves that crazy hair right off Obama's head, lest it turn into an Afro.

They really aren't paying attention the substance of what he says, at least when it comes to policy...But when Romney goes after Obama, it really gets them hot-and-bothered...

...[N]othing makes conservatives hornier than a brazen lie told in pursuit of the destruction of Barack Obama...

er0tikka: Our 'heroes' are just cogs in the 'war machine'

...I think that there was such a backlash to [Chris Hayes's] honest statement shows American culture's inability to reconcile with reality...

Freedom, that nebulous term that means nothing, has no definition and lingers everywhere. Orwellian doublethink embodies itself in words like freedom, heroes, honor, American.

My questions are the same I've been asking for years in regards to war and American exceptionalism: Why do we feel the need to qualify anyone who dies overseas in an illegitimate war as a hero?...

Why are soliders heroes while teachers are burdens? Why are the dead and fallen engaging in foreign occupations respected and regarded with honor while the very same war machine costs us peace, lives and global stability?...

LeftOfYou: Imagine ten Bush 43s...
 
...Just imagine America's political landscape if we had suffered 10 historical George W. Bushes...I'm guessing that America would by now be about as unified as the Balkans after World War I and as peaceful as modern East Africa...

Hunter: ...and a president even worse than Dubya

...[I]n the cold, dead eyes of Michele Bachmann and the perpetually pissed off glare of Rick Santorum, I learned that yes, oh yes—we could indeed have a president who was considerably more dumb than George W. Bush, destroyer of budgets and economies, defender of the doctrine of preemptive, convenient war, perpetual pawn in everyone else's long game. It would be easy. We could have an outright moron, a cold hearted sociopath, a conspiracy theorist as president Just. Like. That...

sujigu: No hatred from the lefty media

...Michelle Malkin and Anne Coulter rake in millions while using schoolyard name calling...

[T]here's an audience for this. These are the people who watch Hannity, O'Reilly, and read the Daily Caller, etc....Decades of blaming unions, minorities, the poor, and foreigners has finally culminated in an audience that understands this world view and is willing to vote with their feet to fund the infrastructure to fuel a media that will package the world the way they want to see it...Can you picture a liberal hate monger, going on television and spewing falsehoods?  He may be neat for a week, but would summarily get kicked off the air and lose his viewership. Who do we have instead? Rachel Maddow, a super intelligent, professional, demure, sensible debater who understands decorum and history. Republicans fear her for her intelligence. Sounds like something that appeals to liberals to me. Where is Rachel's far right equivalent? Oh that's right, he/she doesn't exist...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 06/02/2012 8:56:03 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
...the right is warming to Romney because of his vicious, mendacious attacks on President Obama.

There is nothing vicious or mendacious about telling the truth, unless you are allergic to the truth.

2 posted on 06/02/2012 8:58:35 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Government is the religion of the sociopath.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"Rachel Maddow, a super intelligent, professional, demure, sensible debater who understands decorum and history. Republicans fear her for her intelligence. Sounds like something that appeals to liberals to me. Where is Rachel's far right equivalent? Oh that's right, he/she doesn't exist..."

Ms. Maddow is not intelligent, nor is she professional, and she certainly is not demure. I wonder if you actually understand what the word demure means.

Ms. Maddow is a bitter, little woman with a truckload of "daddy issues", low ratings, and a potty mouth who has no tolerance for anyone who does not share her radical leftists leanings.

3 posted on 06/02/2012 9:13:50 AM PDT by Volunteer (Though I know that the hypnotized never lie, do ya? - The Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I am not warming to Romney in the least.

The RINO’s and early primarys, along with Santorums impossible dream left me no choice but to vote Romney.

Mine is a vote against an illegitiment Muslim Kenyan who has done everything in his power to destroy my medical care, to destroy the economy and to give our nation to another Sovereign. It is a vote against those Communists, Homosexuals,religious & racist bigots,anti Catholics, Baby killers, and tax Dodgers, he picked to serve him./

Certainly I will vote for Romney and then fight every liberal idea he comes up with, but the thing of major importance is to stop Obama.


4 posted on 06/02/2012 9:19:03 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"Why do we feel the need to qualify anyone who dies overseas in an illegitimate war as a hero?..."

Actually, their actions qualify them as heroes. As for the current wars, why in the world would you call them "illegitimate"?

"Why are soliders heroes while teachers are burdens?"

I'll take "Obnoxious Teacher's Unions" for a thousand, Alex.

5 posted on 06/02/2012 9:26:59 AM PDT by Volunteer (Though I know that the hypnotized never lie, do ya? - The Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer
You and I share the same exact perspective.

Bottom line is that if Ubama gets a second term he will spend it working tirelessly to surrender our national sovereignty to a global government that he will eventually be the dictator of.

6 posted on 06/02/2012 9:40:24 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Government is the religion of the sociopath.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Hey Kos! Are you including THIS nasty rich boy, too?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2890720/posts

7 posted on 06/02/2012 10:26:28 AM PDT by FrdmLvr (culture, language, borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Daily Kos? Is that still a thing?

And Rachel Maddow is a smart-mouth snarky dyke who desperately wants to grow a penis. Snotty remarks and smirks do not equate to intelligence.


8 posted on 06/02/2012 11:13:48 AM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
.[N]othing makes conservatives hornier than a brazen lie told in pursuit of the destruction of Barack Obama...

A brazen lie is when ZERO speaks...(or when Biden speaks)

A lie to Liberals is the TRUTH!!

9 posted on 06/02/2012 11:19:27 AM PDT by ExCTCitizen (If we stay home in November '12, don't blame 0 for tearing up the CONSTITUTION!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“No, my first name ain’t ‘bully’, it’s Willard, Mr. Romney if you’re nasty...”


10 posted on 06/02/2012 11:35:00 AM PDT by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Who names their son Rachel in the first place?


11 posted on 06/02/2012 12:05:15 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Ich habe keinen Konig aber Gott)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Someone that names their son Sue?


12 posted on 06/02/2012 3:32:23 PM PDT by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Where is Rachel's far right equivalent? Oh that's right, he/she doesn't exist...

Nor does any right wing network equivalent of MSNBC.

Fox right wing? - they must be joking. As if there is a MSNBC equal to Greta or Shep in the mushy middle...

13 posted on 06/02/2012 9:17:36 PM PDT by Last Dakotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson