Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: LibWhacker
These jerks haven’t the least idea what they are doing.
And if it turns out that we are entering a little ice age instead of global warming, and they manage to make things colder, then what are they going to do.
“Oh. Sorry. Give us another government grant and we’ll fix it. I’m not sure quite how we’ll get that stuff out of the stratosphere, but we’ll think of something! Just pay us more money and give us a few Nobel Prizes!”
2 posted on
06/03/2012 1:47:55 PM PDT by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: LibWhacker
Why don’t they just squirt a lot more ozone up there? Say, some high-flying drone aircraft to just lay down some very high-level sky-writing.
Probably a cheaper deal than this aerosol stuff they are talking about.
Sounds more plausible to me.
3 posted on
06/03/2012 1:49:00 PM PDT by
alloysteel
(Fear and intimidation work. At least on the short term.)
To: LibWhacker
S'ok.... I'm going to burn tires and spread the carbon black on the poles.
/johnny
To: LibWhacker
In the movie "The Matrix" there is an expression used one time and, as far as I know, never explained at all. Apparently, the machines started to take over and humans noted that the evil machines were solar-powered -- so the humans "scorched the sky" to deprive the machines of power. The end result was that machines harnessed humans and used them as living batteries instead.
Scorching the sky? The phrase has never made sense to me. But maybe we'll do it by accident.
5 posted on
06/03/2012 1:52:41 PM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(Obama needs more time. After all — Rome wasn’t burned in a day.)
To: LibWhacker
These people are certifiable. There’s no telling what trouble doing something so stupid on such a large scale would cause...
6 posted on
06/03/2012 1:53:40 PM PDT by
piytar
(The predator-class is furious that their prey are shooting back.)
To: LibWhacker
These people are demonstrably insane.
7 posted on
06/03/2012 1:53:54 PM PDT by
Lurker
(Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
To: LibWhacker
Good gried what a bunch of stupid wankers.
Then when this goes wrong and causes more global warming, or increased skin cancer, or increases the loss of global angular momentum to the solar wind, the solution will (of course) be "we must convert the United States to a socialist economy or the Solar System is doomed."
8 posted on
06/03/2012 1:54:15 PM PDT by
Steely Tom
(If the Constitution can be a living document, I guess a corporation can be a person.)
To: LibWhacker
The glbal temperature may have gone up 1C over the last 100 years (short term) now lets see if we can lower it by 10C over a decade.
9 posted on
06/03/2012 1:54:28 PM PDT by
Mike Darancette
(Ineptocracy; the Obama way.)
To: LibWhacker
Anyone attempting to alter the amount of sunlight reaching Earth should be stopped. Period.
11 posted on
06/03/2012 1:56:59 PM PDT by
Williams
(No Obama)
To: LibWhacker
Let’s see if I understand this correctly: global warming is caused by human activity and is bad, so we’re going to deliberately disperse sulphates in the upper atmosphere to reflect sunlight, and that’s good.
Well, if a racial spoils system is equality, then I guess this makes just as much logical sense.
To: LibWhacker
Oh, goody, maybe they can turn the sky into a sort of mirror and kill off half the world’s population in the process. (Obscure dystopian anime reference.)
15 posted on
06/03/2012 2:02:09 PM PDT by
The_Reader_David
(And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
To: LibWhacker
These busybody fools (Stan and Oliver would compete for their attention) have nothing better to do than to create problems to come up with a resolution to fix over and over and over.
16 posted on
06/03/2012 2:07:13 PM PDT by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
To: LibWhacker
The warming kooks may well find the way mankind can actually destroy the environment, and they will be the ones to do it.
17 posted on
06/03/2012 2:08:01 PM PDT by
pallis
To: LibWhacker
I went to the zoo yesterday.
They have a rainforest exhibit...essentially it is a very fancy greenhouse, with a plexiglass roof. Lots of plants in there...and animals.
It reminded me that heat = life.
This is why the zoo does not have a barren glacier animal exhibit.
Even if the earth were warming, why would that be a bad thing?
20 posted on
06/03/2012 2:10:47 PM PDT by
lacrew
(Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
To: LibWhacker
If they attack the atmosphere of this planet, that will be an act of war.
22 posted on
06/03/2012 2:20:14 PM PDT by
Theophilus
(Not merely prolife, but prolific)
To: LibWhacker
Of course the winds in the Stratosphere wouldn't move these particles around at all ,now would they?
23 posted on
06/03/2012 2:20:46 PM PDT by
moose07
(The truth will out, one day.)
To: LibWhacker
UMMM Y’all are several years behind the curve on this, they’ve already been doing it according to the conspiracy theorist... You ever heard of Chem trails?
I’m just saying..... wake up sheeple
24 posted on
06/03/2012 2:23:08 PM PDT by
WP Lonestar
(No matter where you go, there you are)
To: LibWhacker
These are probably the same idiots that wanted to spread oil over arctic snow to combat global cooling.
25 posted on
06/03/2012 2:28:21 PM PDT by
VeniVidiVici
(Congrats to Ted Kennedy! He's been sober for two years now!!)
To: LibWhacker
This is the equivalent of giving very strong chemotherapy to a perfectly healthy, cancer free patient simply because you can.
26 posted on
06/03/2012 2:32:55 PM PDT by
muir_redwoods
(I like Obamacare because Granny signed the will and I need the cash)
To: LibWhacker
OH WHAT COULD POSSIBLY GO WRONG HERE!!
27 posted on
06/03/2012 2:32:55 PM PDT by
Samurai_Jack
(ride out and confront the evil!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson