Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/03/2012 1:44:05 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
To: LibWhacker

These jerks haven’t the least idea what they are doing.

And if it turns out that we are entering a little ice age instead of global warming, and they manage to make things colder, then what are they going to do.

“Oh. Sorry. Give us another government grant and we’ll fix it. I’m not sure quite how we’ll get that stuff out of the stratosphere, but we’ll think of something! Just pay us more money and give us a few Nobel Prizes!”


2 posted on 06/03/2012 1:47:55 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Why don’t they just squirt a lot more ozone up there? Say, some high-flying drone aircraft to just lay down some very high-level sky-writing.

Probably a cheaper deal than this aerosol stuff they are talking about.

Sounds more plausible to me.


3 posted on 06/03/2012 1:49:00 PM PDT by alloysteel (Fear and intimidation work. At least on the short term.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
S'ok.... I'm going to burn tires and spread the carbon black on the poles.

/johnny

4 posted on 06/03/2012 1:52:22 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
In the movie "The Matrix" there is an expression used one time and, as far as I know, never explained at all. Apparently, the machines started to take over and humans noted that the evil machines were solar-powered -- so the humans "scorched the sky" to deprive the machines of power. The end result was that machines harnessed humans and used them as living batteries instead.

Scorching the sky? The phrase has never made sense to me. But maybe we'll do it by accident.

5 posted on 06/03/2012 1:52:41 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Obama needs more time. After all — Rome wasn’t burned in a day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

These people are certifiable. There’s no telling what trouble doing something so stupid on such a large scale would cause...


6 posted on 06/03/2012 1:53:40 PM PDT by piytar (The predator-class is furious that their prey are shooting back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

These people are demonstrably insane.


7 posted on 06/03/2012 1:53:54 PM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
Good gried what a bunch of stupid wankers.

Then when this goes wrong and causes more global warming, or increased skin cancer, or increases the loss of global angular momentum to the solar wind, the solution will (of course) be "we must convert the United States to a socialist economy or the Solar System is doomed."

8 posted on 06/03/2012 1:54:15 PM PDT by Steely Tom (If the Constitution can be a living document, I guess a corporation can be a person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

The glbal temperature may have gone up 1C over the last 100 years (short term) now lets see if we can lower it by 10C over a decade.


9 posted on 06/03/2012 1:54:28 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Ineptocracy; the Obama way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Anyone attempting to alter the amount of sunlight reaching Earth should be stopped. Period.


11 posted on 06/03/2012 1:56:59 PM PDT by Williams (No Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Let’s see if I understand this correctly: global warming is caused by human activity and is bad, so we’re going to deliberately disperse sulphates in the upper atmosphere to reflect sunlight, and that’s good.

Well, if a racial spoils system is equality, then I guess this makes just as much logical sense.


12 posted on 06/03/2012 1:57:21 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Oh, goody, maybe they can turn the sky into a sort of mirror and kill off half the world’s population in the process. (Obscure dystopian anime reference.)


15 posted on 06/03/2012 2:02:09 PM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
These busybody fools (Stan and Oliver would compete for their attention) have nothing better to do than to create problems to come up with a resolution to fix over and over and over.
16 posted on 06/03/2012 2:07:13 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

The warming kooks may well find the way mankind can actually destroy the environment, and they will be the ones to do it.


17 posted on 06/03/2012 2:08:01 PM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

I went to the zoo yesterday.

They have a rainforest exhibit...essentially it is a very fancy greenhouse, with a plexiglass roof. Lots of plants in there...and animals.

It reminded me that heat = life.

This is why the zoo does not have a barren glacier animal exhibit.

Even if the earth were warming, why would that be a bad thing?


20 posted on 06/03/2012 2:10:47 PM PDT by lacrew (Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

If they attack the atmosphere of this planet, that will be an act of war.


22 posted on 06/03/2012 2:20:14 PM PDT by Theophilus (Not merely prolife, but prolific)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Of course the winds in the Stratosphere wouldn't move these particles around at all ,now would they?
23 posted on 06/03/2012 2:20:46 PM PDT by moose07 (The truth will out, one day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

UMMM Y’all are several years behind the curve on this, they’ve already been doing it according to the conspiracy theorist... You ever heard of Chem trails?
I’m just saying..... wake up sheeple


24 posted on 06/03/2012 2:23:08 PM PDT by WP Lonestar (No matter where you go, there you are)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

These are probably the same idiots that wanted to spread oil over arctic snow to combat global cooling.


25 posted on 06/03/2012 2:28:21 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Congrats to Ted Kennedy! He's been sober for two years now!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

This is the equivalent of giving very strong chemotherapy to a perfectly healthy, cancer free patient simply because you can.


26 posted on 06/03/2012 2:32:55 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (I like Obamacare because Granny signed the will and I need the cash)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

OH WHAT COULD POSSIBLY GO WRONG HERE!!


27 posted on 06/03/2012 2:32:55 PM PDT by Samurai_Jack (ride out and confront the evil!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson