Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is the Queen homophobic?
Scoop World ^ | Saturday, 2 June 2012 | Peter Tatchell

Posted on 06/03/2012 2:43:31 PM PDT by presidio9

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-88 next last

1 posted on 06/03/2012 2:43:35 PM PDT by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Good for the queen.


2 posted on 06/03/2012 2:44:36 PM PDT by John W (Viva Cristo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

What a bunch of queens.


3 posted on 06/03/2012 2:45:12 PM PDT by VanDeKoik (If case you are wondering, I'm STILL supporting Newt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I’d bet she prefers the term “homonauseous”.


4 posted on 06/03/2012 2:45:35 PM PDT by gorush (History repeats itself because human nature is static)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Bitch, bitch, bitch.


5 posted on 06/03/2012 2:46:24 PM PDT by Huntress ("Politicians exploit economic illiteracy." --Walter Williams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Is she also beastiphobic because she has never once mentioned the community of people that have sex with animals?


6 posted on 06/03/2012 2:48:08 PM PDT by icwhatudo (This is not a choice between Romney&Reagan-Its between Romney & most radical leftist Pres in history)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
"As our head of state, Elizabeth II is supposed to represent and embrace all British people, not just some."

Child molesters, pornographers, and wife beaters -- the Queen has also scandalously failed to reach out and support these people as well.

7 posted on 06/03/2012 2:48:48 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Obama needs more time. After all -- Rome wasn't burned in a day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I’d say she’s not a panderer.

She needs no campaign contributions and doesn’t need to win any elections.

To her she’s the only Queen that counts.


8 posted on 06/03/2012 2:49:46 PM PDT by seowulf ("If you write a whole line of zeroes, it's still---nothing"...Kira Alexandrovna Argounova)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Who cares, Mr Tatchell??? Does she routinely single out groups to glorify? Or is the LGBT group so insecure and needy that they need props CONSTANTLY? Never mind. I just answered my own question.
9 posted on 06/03/2012 2:50:05 PM PDT by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huntress
No kidding. 'The love that dare not speak' has turned into 'the queers that just won't shut the hell up'

/johnny

10 posted on 06/03/2012 2:51:22 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Yes. She’s afraid of her son.


11 posted on 06/03/2012 2:51:39 PM PDT by Defiant (If there are infinite parallel universes, why Lord, am I living in the one with Obama as President?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

This fairy is bitchier than Mark Morford.


12 posted on 06/03/2012 2:51:48 PM PDT by Slings and Arrows (You can't have Ingsoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

What do you call a gay milkman?

(Down)

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

A dairy queen


13 posted on 06/03/2012 2:53:05 PM PDT by NowApproachingMidnight (“Civilizations die from suicide, not murder.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
So what Mr Tatchell. So what.

Is the LGBT community heterphobic? For all the ‘hate mongering’ they do one would think so.

I don't like LGBT either, that doesn't make me homophobic.

A phobia is defined as: an exaggerated inexplicable and illogical fear of a particular object, class of objects, or situation.

I am tired of the LGBT community calling people homophobic, when we simply state it is not a lifestyle we choose or condone. It is like me saying I won't serve spinach because I don't like spinach and won't serve my guests that which I don't like.

LGBT community needs to get over itself and no...I don't have to accept their lifestyle. Just as I don't accept a drug addict lifestyle, a drunken lifestyle, or serving spinach just because my cousin Sally thinks I should.

14 posted on 06/03/2012 2:55:19 PM PDT by EBH (Obama took away your American Dreams and replaced them with "Dreams from My (his) Father".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NowApproachingMidnight

Did you hear about the Scottish drag queen?

He wore pants.


15 posted on 06/03/2012 2:56:43 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Her Majesty,
by John Lennon and Paul McCartney

Her majesty's a pretty nice girl
but she doesn't have a lot to say.
Her majesty's a pretty nice girl
but she changes from day to day.

I wanna tell her that I love her a lot,
but I gotta get a belly full of wine.
Her majesty's a pretty nice girl,
someday I'm gonna make her mine.
Oh yeah, someday I'm gonna make her mine.

16 posted on 06/03/2012 2:57:05 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Government is the religion of the sociopath.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye

Bingo!


17 posted on 06/03/2012 2:57:41 PM PDT by sagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Homosexuals and their advocates have effectively turned their sexual perversity into a righteous cause that is totally beyond criticism and today demands an attitude of obsequiousness from public figures, especially politicians. Apparently, the homosexual crusaders don't intend to allow the 86-year-old Queen of England to escape her turn at fawning over homosexual behavior by pretending to care deeply about the welfare and happiness of those who chose to engage in homosexual acts.

The tried-and-true leftist ploy of lumping everyone who engages in homosexual acts as part of a group ('LGBT') and then denouncing the queen (or anyone) for not giving enough attention (and assumed respect) to anyone in that group as 'insensitive' and, all together now: 'homophobic' may well succeed with Queen Elizabeth. If not, it would be one of the few times I ever cheered for the British monarchy.

18 posted on 06/03/2012 3:02:21 PM PDT by Jim Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
"While she has spoken approvingly of the UK's many races and faiths, for six decades the Queen has ignored lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) Britons. If she treated black and Asian Britons in the same way, she'd be denounced as a racist. Why the double standards?

Maybe, just maybe, it might be because an LGBT or Q is not a race?

Is the author of this piece some kind of idiot? (rhetorical question only - the question answers itself).

19 posted on 06/03/2012 3:07:54 PM PDT by Zeppo ("Happy Pony is on - and I'm NOT missing Happy Pony")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

What a bunch of cry babies! The queen is not obligated to their cause. Maybe they should stick with the folks and Penny’s and Target. The queen has her hands full with her creepy family.


20 posted on 06/03/2012 3:09:31 PM PDT by formosa (Formosa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Still pretending that their butts are a race, I see.


21 posted on 06/03/2012 3:10:00 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

That’s gonna leave a mark.


22 posted on 06/03/2012 3:10:00 PM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

There’s no “double standard.”


23 posted on 06/03/2012 3:10:00 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

If she is homophobic, that’s great.

Anyne who isn’t is contributing to the Sodomisation of the planet.


24 posted on 06/03/2012 3:17:49 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
"Not once in her 60-year reign has the Queen publicly acknowledged the existence of the gay [sic] community..."

I could swear I remember her saying something once about an "anus horribilis".

25 posted on 06/03/2012 3:19:55 PM PDT by Hunton Peck (See my FR homepage for a list of businesses that support WI Gov. Scott Walker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

We should be so lucky.


26 posted on 06/03/2012 3:21:09 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Scott

Brilliant, thank you, copied what you wrote to send out.


27 posted on 06/03/2012 3:21:44 PM PDT by kabumpo (Kabumpo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

She’s never waterboarded a kindergarten class either....

Why not ?

< / sarcasm>


28 posted on 06/03/2012 3:21:48 PM PDT by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But have a plan to kill everyone you meet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
who cares?

.

29 posted on 06/03/2012 3:22:22 PM PDT by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Her Majesty doesn’t read polls or chase every trend. She stands for traditional values and is a living link to history. She is a wonderful example of how to behave, unlike sleazy politicians that come and go. God Save The Queen.


30 posted on 06/03/2012 3:23:48 PM PDT by Astronaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

So she’s probably conservative in her social views. Why does everyone in the world have to be on board with “they gay agenda”? It’s ridiculous.


31 posted on 06/03/2012 3:26:48 PM PDT by JSDude1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I should hope so.


32 posted on 06/03/2012 3:27:07 PM PDT by Hardraade (http://junipersec.wordpress.com (nobody gives me warheads anyway))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

What is there about Sodomites that renders them incapable of distinguishing between fear and disgust?


33 posted on 06/03/2012 3:35:47 PM PDT by davius (You can roll manure in powdered sugar but that don't make it a jelly doughnut.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye
Or is the LGBT group so insecure and needy that they need props CONSTANTLY? Never mind. I just answered my own question.

Right. If this writer wasn't so insecure, because of his own internalization, knowing deep down in his heart and soul that his behavior is not good, he wouldn't constantly demand others to tell him that it is. It the like the old adage from Shakespeare, "He doth protest too much, methinks.".

34 posted on 06/03/2012 3:39:51 PM PDT by Bellflower (The LORD is Holy, separated from all sin, perfect, righteous, high and lifted up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Unlike elected officials and the mass of faceless bureaucrats devoted to trendy social dogma, the Queen doesn’t have to abide by the restrictions of the silly, PC morons who are running the majority of governments around the world.

In other words, she can call ‘em as she sees ‘em.

Or as she would prefer NOT to see ‘em.


35 posted on 06/03/2012 3:40:19 PM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Although she is a patron of many good causes, none of them are gay or serve the gay community.

Is the person trying to say that the "gay community" doesn't use medical services, fine arts, poverty programs, or anything else the Queen has supported? He probably is, but it's not true.

It's fascinating that "gays" never mention the murderous bigotry of Moslems ... they do know that they're going to die horribly under Shari'a, don't they? Or do they all think - given the actuarial stats on homosexuals - that they'll die of natural causes first?

36 posted on 06/03/2012 3:41:48 PM PDT by Tax-chick (Make sure you notice when I'm being subtly ironic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
As the leader of the Church of England she understands God's word and,thus,understands that homosexual acts are contrary,*very much* contrary,to God's law.So of course she's not going to say or do anything that could be interpreted as being approval of such acts...or such “lifestyles”.
37 posted on 06/03/2012 3:42:32 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (If Mugabe Had A Son He'd Look Like Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
"As our head of state, Elizabeth II is supposed to represent and embrace all British people, not just some. How much longer will the LGBT community have to wait for royal recognition and acceptance?

When hell freezes over is open on my calendar. lol

38 posted on 06/03/2012 3:44:48 PM PDT by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Why would she give any more attention to the narcissism and nihilism of mentally ill people who claim a vile filthy immature act is “good”. Just mentioning that group is talking about a disgusting sexual act.

No group which is noted for foul sexual acts should be given the time of day—like since Christianity became the paradigm and homosexuality and pederasty and slavery were put in the closet.

Evil can NEVER be good, even if the majority say it is. That is what Moral Absolutes are all about. Abortion is evil also and majority vote should not be able to take away a person’s life-—it is evil (Hitlerian) whether the majority think so or not.

She remains a Classy Queen with Moral Absolutes. Good for her.


39 posted on 06/03/2012 3:45:22 PM PDT by savagesusie (Right Reason According to Nature = Just Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Queen Elizabeth is a good woman. I admire her very much.

(And Prince Phillip is a colorful old crackpot, like some of my great-uncles, if they were European royalty instead of Missouri farmers.)


40 posted on 06/03/2012 3:46:53 PM PDT by Tax-chick (Make sure you notice when I'm being subtly ironic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Long live the Queen. It wasn’t that long ago that homosexuals were considered perverts. Old vets will recall homosexuals being dumped from the military.
Now they teach little kids in school that homosexual behavior is normal ie Johnny has two mommies and schools promote gay and lesbian day.


41 posted on 06/03/2012 3:48:29 PM PDT by kenmcg (How)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Perhaps she lives by the credo: “There can only be one Queen.”


42 posted on 06/03/2012 3:50:59 PM PDT by Molon Labbie (Prep. Now. Live Healthy, take your Shooting Iron daily.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

TOSS-ed salad UP

43 posted on 06/03/2012 3:58:06 PM PDT by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Me, me, me, me, me, me -— jeesh, what losers. So the Queen does not recognize your little group, so you call her a bad name?


44 posted on 06/03/2012 3:59:53 PM PDT by LibertarianLiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Homophilia on his part does not constitute Homophobia on her part.


45 posted on 06/03/2012 4:00:27 PM PDT by KrisKrinkle (Blessed be those who know the depth and breadth of their ignorance. Cursed be those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bellflower

Exactly. If homosexuality is truly the “wonderful” thing he and his fellow travelers think it is, then why does he constantly need for everyone else on the planet to agree with him? I’m a conservative, Bible-believing Christian and I don’t need anyone to agree with me although I’m happy for those who do.


46 posted on 06/03/2012 4:20:20 PM PDT by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
God save the Queen...
47 posted on 06/03/2012 4:20:20 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Do ya think she didn’t notice after knighting Sir Elton, and being introduced to Lady John?


48 posted on 06/03/2012 4:22:36 PM PDT by rawcatslyentist ("Behold, I am against you, O arrogant one," Jeremiah 50:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

The Queen is NORMAL, and ny NORMAL person destest the gay ACT!....and their AGENDA!!


49 posted on 06/03/2012 4:23:23 PM PDT by Ann Archy ( ABORTION...the HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chode

... she’s not a human being.


50 posted on 06/03/2012 4:24:12 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson