Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Parents of Adolf Hitler denied custody
UPI ^ | May 31, 2012

Posted on 06/03/2012 6:58:32 PM PDT by presidio9

A New Jersey judge ruled the parents of four children with Nazi-inspired names will not get custody of their kids.

Adolf Hitler Campbell, 6, and his two sisters, Joycelynn Aryan Nation Campbell, 5, and Honszlynn Hinler Jeannie Campbell, 4, have been in state custody since shortly after a Holland Township grocer refused to decorate a birthday cake for the boy's third birthday, The (Newark, N.J.) Star-Ledger reported Wednesday.

State officials allegedly took custody of a newborn son, Hons Campbell, just hours after his birth in November.

Now, a Superior Court judge has decided that self-proclaimed Nazis Heath and Deborah Campbell cannot have custody of their children.

"These kids weren't abused. Our kids weren't taken because of abuse," Heath Campbell said. "I'm honest about who I am and what I am."

Lawyers in the case are prohibited from talking to the media by a gag order, but Kristine Brown, spokeswoman for the New Jersey Division of Youth and Family Services, said, "every call or investigation that DYFS initiates at the end of the day is to determine if the child is at risk or in the midst of child abuse and neglect."

"If I have to give up my Nazism, then so be it. I'll do it,"

(Excerpt) Read more at upi.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: americannazis; hitler; newjersey; usnaziepidemic
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: presidio9
Besides naming their children obnoxious names, what exactly did these parents do to their children that warranted government intervention to take them from their custody?

I am asking because I no longer just assume that any action by any level of government against any citizen is necessarily based upon any actual law.

21 posted on 06/03/2012 7:38:23 PM PDT by sarasmom ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=xZsFe6dM3EY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I’m surprised that the name tapered off as slowly as it did in the US.
http://www.babynamewizard.com/voyager#prefix=adolph&ms=false&exact=true


22 posted on 06/03/2012 7:39:52 PM PDT by posterchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
The couple in presidio9’s post (post#9) are not the children's parents. They are two characters from the loathsome “reality show" Jersey Shore.

You, Brilliant, get bonus points for NOT knowing that. On the other hand, I am ashamed that I do know that.

23 posted on 06/03/2012 7:45:57 PM PDT by Leaning Right (Why am I carrying this lantern? you ask. I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
No, that's, um, someone else.

sigh

24 posted on 06/03/2012 7:46:01 PM PDT by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

Beat me to it.


25 posted on 06/03/2012 7:47:46 PM PDT by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

LOL, good stuff, and likewise on that last.


26 posted on 06/03/2012 8:02:24 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

If they had called him Adolf Shickelgruber, I suppose there never would have been much of a stink.


27 posted on 06/03/2012 8:05:17 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Seal the records and place them with families in Texas!
28 posted on 06/03/2012 8:11:46 PM PDT by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
I have mixed feelings about this because I know the kids will suffer because of those names.

I agree. The kids may or may not adopt their parents' beliefs and will have to legally change their names when they're of age if they choose to do so. These parents used their children as a billboard for their political beliefs, an utterly cruel and selfish act. I don't see why the state had to take them, but I still have little sympathy for the parents.

29 posted on 06/03/2012 8:12:16 PM PDT by randog (Tap into America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: momtothree

Hey, if some BP parents name their kids things like Kill Whitey and Farrakhan Jr., I would recommend the same thing happen to them.


30 posted on 06/03/2012 8:21:22 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Occupy DC General Assembly: We are Marxist tools. WE ARE MARXIST TOOLS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup
"...but if the state can do this? Who is next, people who name their child John-Paul?"

Exactly. I despise Hitler and Stalin equally but the state should have no say in this matter.

31 posted on 06/03/2012 9:08:07 PM PDT by ciaocotc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!

What?!?!?!?

I’ve lived in the Philippines for a while and been there off and on for a decade, I have never heard or seen this.

First, there are far more last names, both Spanish and native origin, than in Korea for example (Lee, Park, Kim).

I work on computer directories, so last names and name conflicts are a big deal to me. Korea was a mess with ~80% having one of 4 last names.

That problem does not exist in the Philippines. There are scores of different languages and ethnic tribes, many of which have unique surnames.

Second, most Hispanic families (I lived in Mexico for a while too) give kids nicknames, and some would be considered offensive in the US (like “Negrito” or “Gordito” or “Chivis” for example).

The nicknames I know of Filipinos, just off the top of my head:
- Jay Ar (about 40 variations of this)
- Bong for Melchor
- Precious for Mary Grace
- Dhatz for Mohammad
- Tisoy for Melvin
- Tyson for Roby
- Ross for Roseando
- Boy is used in many nicknames

...these are not off the wall, offensive, or based on major Nazi figures.

I don’t know where you saw or read this, but it is something I’ve never seen in the parts of Luzon where I spend most of my time.


32 posted on 06/03/2012 9:11:04 PM PDT by TexasGunRunner (Don't wait, join/donate now to restore the US: http://www.organize4palin.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Okay, I understand and see that. They really projected their beliefs and used the kids without considering the issues the kids would have, granted.

...but who do you set up as the name police? What names do you consider offensive?

Clearly expletives would be unacceptable, but as abhorrent as Nazism and racism are, it is still legal in the US to be a Nazi or a racist and advocate those sick worldviews.

This is not Germany where the swastika and positive references to Nazism is banned. This is the US, where even the most despicable and evil concepts are protected precisely because we trust people and don’t trust censors to decide what is acceptable and what is not acceptable.

I agree giving the kids these names is horrible, but believing in Nazism is not yet a crime. This is s very dangerous precedent.

Are they going to punish parents for naming kids Jesus (common Spanish name), Christian, or Faith? Who are the name police and what criteria do they use to determine what is ok and was is not?

This is like death panels for child naming...way too much power to be given to a bureaucrat!


33 posted on 06/03/2012 9:17:50 PM PDT by TexasGunRunner (Don't wait, join/donate now to restore the US: http://www.organize4palin.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: presidio9; Jeremiah Jr
A New Jersey judge ruled the parents of four children with Nazi-inspired names will not get custody of their kids.

It wasn't Illinois...


34 posted on 06/03/2012 9:24:04 PM PDT by Ezekiel (The Obama-nation began with the Inauguration of Desolation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

So now it’s a race to see who can screw those kids over more, the parents or the courts. Glad to see the welfare of the kids is a top priority.


35 posted on 06/03/2012 9:45:45 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (This space for rent...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

So now it’s a race to see who can screw those kids over more, the parents or the courts. Glad to see the welfare of the kids is a top priority. /s


36 posted on 06/03/2012 9:46:02 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (This space for rent...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGunRunner

Nobody would normally know about little Adolph that Hitler was his middle name. Unless he wanted of himself to make a point of it.

There’s got to be more to the custody case than those silly, vain names.


37 posted on 06/03/2012 9:47:49 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Let me ABOs run loose Lou!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
This was never about the kids name.

The first story I read was about a store refusing to put the son's name on a birthday cake.

I did research on this case some time ago, but don't have the links. I was as incensed as everyone until I found out how dysfunctional the family really is. Despite what the parents are saying, there was a pattern of abuse/neglect between the parents and the kids. Child protective services had visited the home several times in the past. I think drugs were involved as well. If I recall, CPS has been prohibited from discussing the case, so anyone can write a story about what is happening, but the evidence of abuse is apparently being withheld.

There has been a lot of misreporting on the facts surrounding this family.

38 posted on 06/03/2012 10:33:05 PM PDT by Tex-Con-Man (T. Coddington Van Voorhees VII 2012 - "Together, I Shall Ride You To Victory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tex-Con-Man

So the press wanted this to be a story about parents losing their kids for giving them an un-pc name, and they then proceeded to sweep all inconvenient details under the rug? Sounds familiar.

To be fair to 60 Minutes, tonight’s story was about a 10yr old boy shooting his Nazi father. 60 Minutes wanted so badly to conclude that the Nazi culture was responsible. It turned out that the father was an abusive alcholic loser.

Look, Nazisim is idiotic, but the state has no business telling parents what they can and can not teach their kids.


39 posted on 06/03/2012 10:42:03 PM PDT by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Ezekiel

"Who ARE those guys?"

40 posted on 06/03/2012 10:47:23 PM PDT by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson