Skip to comments.[MO] Democratic Party head no longer with the party following domestic assault arrest [Homosexual]
Posted on 06/04/2012 2:56:43 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
Matt Teter is no longer executive director of the state Democratic Party following his arrest on suspicion of domestic assault after an altercation with his boyfriend last month...
Teter and his boyfriend got into an argument in the early morning hours of Feb. 19, according to a St. Louis Police Department report. The police interview with the boyfriend was conducted in an emergency room at St. Louis University Hospital.
The boyfriend told police that Teter was upset with him for coming home at 2:30 a.m. The couple lived in Soulard, and that night was the neighborhood's big Mardi Gras celebration. The report says the argument escalated when Teter called the boyfriend's parents in Pennsylvania, and the boyfriend punched Teter in the stomach.
(Excerpt) Read more at stltoday.com ...
Dunno, it could as easily have hurt him as helped.
A great many of the Democrat Party members and financial supporters are homosexual activists. The media covers up the high percentage of homosexuals in the Democrat Party and their agenda.
I’m actually surprised this doesn’t happen more often.
These arguments over who is going to be on the bottom can wind up rather nasty, win or lose.
Outrage has failed, so what can we do but laugh at it?!?
I hear ya. Sorry to be so brutal, that’s what our little kids are dealing with in school. We just as well face it ourselves.
This isn’t the bully discussion. This is the high muckety muck Democrat fags discussion. I’d hope issues of who does who and how don’t get serious in school (hey, is that in sex ed yet?)
As I understand it, homosexuality sensitivity training is being introduced to children as young as the first and second grade. In some places I’ve seen it intimated that even kindergarten students get some sort of sensitivity training, along the lines of what we do for minorities and gender biases.
Is this in all schools? I don’t think so. In states that are pushing same sex marriage they are more inclined to include it to meet anti discrimination guidelines.
I don’t care what adults do in privacy (actually I do, but I think you know what I mean), but once you make something societal weight neutral, you sign on to a lot more than that when it comes to indoctrinating children.
IMO, this is what the drive for same sex marriage is really all about. Ultimately, this is a NAMBLA wet dream.
Nobody can explain to me how you indoctrinate kids to be kind to homosexuals unless they explain what a homosexual is.
GACK! I don’t even want young kids being pestered about heterosexual norms in full. It’s age inappropriate.
There is a lot of dirt in that worm can ain’t there.
Who does whom and how... and it can lead to fights... now IMHO the dynamic of most homo conduct is tied up (no pun intended) with that of bullying. Which is one reason I say that socking the bullies is only a stopgap. It’s glorified way too much in culture and any godly sensibility would oppose that too. But anyhow, rant off.
Pink Napkins! No!, Blue Napkins!, No, Pink!, Blue!
Does this mean that the “marriage” is off?
I have a slight problem with the person who threw the first punch complaining unless the reaction is clearly excessive. First rule of fight club and all.
I hear ya. Thanks for your comments.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.