Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Studio Canít Turn Down Gay Weddings (NM - Christian photography business)
The Albuquerque Journal North ^ | June 5, 2012 | Scott Sandlin

Posted on 06/05/2012 8:54:59 AM PDT by CedarDave

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-131 last
To: Kazan

They do have that right, something I made abundantly clear. I think they were simply wrong on two counts:

A: bad business decision: it’s not really up to the caterer, the florist and the photographer to “bless” a wedding. They are there to perform a service for a fee, period. Now, as for Pastor, or counselor. That’s something altogether different.

B: I think they were used. I think this gay couple picked this business out in a blatant attempt to embarrass them. I think the gay couple KNEW this would happen. I think the business was simply used as a pawn very predictably.

But not doubt, they are 100% within your rights. Remember, it is not always smart to exercise every right you have in every situation.


121 posted on 06/06/2012 9:33:38 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
It’s a private business!!

No such thing anymore in the USSA.

122 posted on 06/06/2012 9:36:17 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Leep

You were talking about refusing homo sex being discriminatory.


123 posted on 06/06/2012 9:47:14 AM PDT by stuartcr ("When silence speaks, it speaks only to those that have already decided what they want to hear.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr

You were talking about refusing homo sex being discriminatory.


I ask it in future tense,too.
I would never conceive that we would have a president who favors infanticide or giving old people a “blue pill”
Yet, here we are.


124 posted on 06/06/2012 9:54:51 AM PDT by Leep (Enemy of the Statist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Leep

That’s why I asked about refusing hetero sex being discriminatory. It happens all the time now and isn’t considered discriminatory, is it?


125 posted on 06/06/2012 10:05:44 AM PDT by stuartcr ("When silence speaks, it speaks only to those that have already decided what they want to hear.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright
Jesus spent most of his time with sinners - not to condone their sin - but to be a light.

Jesus also told believers not to cast their pearls before swine. And, when Jesus did deal with the unrepentant, He rebuked them.

And, nowhere in the Bible does it say Jesus or believers should take an action that validates sin, which taking photos at homosexual "wedding" would do.

126 posted on 06/06/2012 12:24:32 PM PDT by Kazan (Mitt Romney: The greater of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright
Let me be clear: you are a nauseating self righteous JERK for that statement

Notice how the insults always flow from Sir C. Edmund's keyboard when some points out he is wrong and a lukewarm Christian.

127 posted on 06/06/2012 12:26:48 PM PDT by Kazan (Mitt Romney: The greater of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright
Jesus spent most of his time with sinners - not to condone their sin - but to be a light.

So, based on that logic, perhaps ministers should be performing gay weddings as a means of showing homosexuals the light! Makes as much sense as assisting two lesbians by taking pictures at a wedding ceremony.

128 posted on 06/06/2012 12:44:57 PM PDT by Kazan (Mitt Romney: The greater of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

You are very logically challenged. And a Pharisee. And did I mention you are logically challenged? And you like to take offense at comments not even directed at you. But these are, so take away.......I will not waste any more time with you.


129 posted on 06/06/2012 12:51:49 PM PDT by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: pallis

Thank you very much; your prayers are appreciated.


130 posted on 06/06/2012 1:06:52 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr

That’s why I asked about refusing hetero sex being discriminatory. It happens all the time now and isn’t considered discriminatory, is it?

Unless I am totally misunderstanding something. If you refuse any kind of sex and the person you refuse continues to try to have sex with you that is unattempted rape?

The difference is homos want unreasonable consideration concidering they can not conceive or given they want a institution such as marriage to recognise what is basically a mockery to the institution of marriage.
They should have been happy with civil unions which is not offensive to religious people.


131 posted on 06/06/2012 2:55:08 PM PDT by Leep (Enemy of the Statist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-131 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson