Skip to comments.Britainís Already Dead, It Just Hasnít Been Buried Yet
Posted on 06/05/2012 9:01:43 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Dont be fooled by the pomp and dazzle of the Queens royal Diamond Jubilee flotilla easing past the tourists, celebrity-spotters, and pickpockets on the Thames. Britain is a country rotting from the inside, the first nation on earth that elected to destroy its culture with political correctness.
Asks British columnist Rod Liddle, Who are the people who have made Britain what it is today, the ones who ensured that we became a limp-wristed and decrepit, post-imperial satrapy of incompetence, sanctimony, self-obsession and self-loathing?
Who indeed? (By limp-wristed, Liddle means lacking in conviction, not gay). The short answer is the new aristocracy, the bien pensant, well-shod, culturally aloof types who watch the BBC, read The Guardian, and vote to nudge the country ever farther along its current trajectory, which has not even slightly been altered by the return of a Conservative to the premiership. Against the wishes of the average citizen, Britain has a government that is simultaneously abdicating its core functions and pretending to take responsibility for other duties for which it is spectacularly ill-suited. It has abandoned a proud, concrete culture in pursuit of a hazy dream of a transnational ideal. The peoples response has been to fume lightly and do nothing, because theyre British and expect things to be bad and get worse.
A few days in London will quickly cure you of any notion that, for instance, New York is a chaotic city. It only barely rated notice in most of the media the other day when five of Londons 11 subway lines went down simultaneously  at rush hour due to signal failures and train breakdowns. It was about 80 degrees at the time and most trains have no air conditioning. Subway unions are threatening a strike. And yet a glance at the national news sources, which are obsessed with the massacres in Syria, the Jubilee, the Olympics, and the never-ending Leveson Inquiry that vaguely promises a sinister new truth czar will be empowered to decide in advance which media stories can be published, turns up almost zero outrage at all of this.
The respectable media outlets dont much bother with the latest outrages on the crime front, such as the fatal convenience-store stabbing  that resulted in only a ten-year sentence for the assailant, who is expected to be free in four. Unleash a nutty racist tirade on the subway , though, and you stand in contempt of that BBC-transnational ideal of a multiculti wonderland. Judges will express no leniency whatsoever, handing out five month sentences for the crime of… speaking.
So the government cant make the trains run on time or make people feel safe on the streets. (a friend who lived in New York for many years tells me of how, after moving to London, he witnessed a stabbing, called the police, and waited a number of minutes for them to arrive, by which time the perpetrators were long gone. The nearest police station was about 300 yards away, but the constabulary decided to send representatives from a farther one instead, lest they risk crossing paths with any violent criminals.)
Never let it be said the government is satisfied with this state of affairs; no, instead, it is advancing into brand new areas of incompetence. The prime minister has been boasting of his exciting plan  to literally head a nanny state as he sets up, for new parents, an office to send texts, hold classes, and give tiredness counseling. (For a play-by-play of Britains collapse, consult the blogger-columnist Peter Hitchens , who, ever since writing The Abolition of Britain  over a decade ago, invariably takes the most pessimistic imaginable view of things and yet is rarely wrong.)
On the business side of things, a government-commissioned venture capitalists report called for some obvious changes in labor regulations that would make it easier to fire workers (and consequently make businesses less leery of hiring in the first place). The left-wing, Liberal Democrat business minister, whose relationship with his field is much like that of an infectious diseases specialist, called the plan completely bonkers and suffered no repercussions from his boss whatsoever. The plan will gather dust. Another government minister, Conservative William Hague, actually gave an interview in which he told business to stop complaining and just hire . Currently, when a business wants to fire someone, it often has to justify the decision before a labor tribunal . A proposed reform would substitute a sort of pre-settlement in which the fired worker gets a cash payout instead of the right to endless litigation.
From offshore, Britain finds itself in the absurd version of a V-2 attack, with almost weekly regulatory strafing coming in from the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights. Britain, which voted simply to join a common market in 1973 but never voted to be ruled from the continent, is so used to such indignities as being told that it must not deport al-Qaeda terrorist Abu Qatada and must furnish prisoners with ballots, that even David Camerons Conservatives generally respond by being loudly huffy and doing nothing. Camerons latest solemn vow is that he will ignore the ECHR directive to give votes to prisoners. Well see. If he is going to deny the ECHR the sovereignty it plainly lacks, why doesnt he go all the way?
Because hes afraid of the BBC.
We joke about the state media in America, but in Britain by far the leading media outlet is the BBC, which operates independently but is effectively funded by a tax (a large one, more than you pay for HBO). Awash in public funding, it does exactly what youd think it would do: attack competitors and promote a left-liberal worldview, for instance by portraying anyone opposed to the grand European project as eccentric and possibly demented. Now that Europe is imploding and Britons say, by a 51 to 28 margin, that they want to leave the EU , the political-media complex is scrambling to prevent the issue from ever coming to a vote (though if it does, the same complex will move mountains to ensure the vote is the correct, transnational one). George Osborne, the number two man in the Tory party, has actually suggested that the solution to Europe is more Europe — fiscal and policy integration, i.e., a superstate with its capital in Brussels and its biggest source of power in Berlin. Britain would finally relinquish all claim to authority over its own affairs and essentially cease to exist as a political entity. What Hitler and Napoleon couldnt do, the dull Eurocrats and their silky-voiced, terribly respectable media cheerleaders are intent on doing. But then again, Britain is already dead, it just hasnt been buried yet.
sa·tra·py (str-p, -trp, str-p) n. pl. sa·tra·pies 1. The territory or sphere under the rule of a satrap. 2. A nation, state, territory, or area controlled as if by a satrap: "No military legions from the West are going to liberate their Eastern European satrapies" (John Hughes).
Limp wristed Liberals are a disease everywhere...
“Who are the people who have made Britain what it is today, the ones who ensured that we became a limp-wristed and decrepit, post-imperial satrapy of incompetence, sanctimony, self-obsession and self-loathing?”
Wish I had written that.
Excellent article, thanks for posting. Britain is toast - specifically, toasted pita the Muslims are dipping into the hummus of Sharia to eat, while Brits are arrested for injuring home invaders and then deprived medical care while prisoners are given full hospitalization.
And the Rats want nothing better than to intall the same self-destruction here.
I suspect they’re not the same people.
A few generations ago the Brits ruled half of the world and their navy ruled the oceans of the world.
They sat on top of the greatest empire ever assembled.
Now their government doesn’t even allow them to own a pistol, to carry a pocket knife or use a pointed stick for self defense.
We are well on our way to the same collapse and liberal hell.
Oy’m not dead...
Cracks started appearing in the British psyche, 70 years ago, when they threw out hands-down, national hero Winston Churchill, to elect the Labour socialists, in a decisive electoral defeat.
I don’t want to go on th’ cart.
So in other words, the once great British Lion, is now a shallow, narcissistic, homosexual pussy.
WE have the shallow, narcissistic, homosexual pussy!
Ho ho ho!
“WE have the shallow, narcissistic, homosexual pussy!”
That we do.
However, the description in the article, was citing British society as a whole.
Our America-hating, RaceMarxist, Faggot in Chief aside, they are a lot further down the destructive, politically-correct, socialist spiral than we are.
Thanks for the ping.
Two things England can do (but won’t) to right itself: bring back guns for the populace, and kick out every Muslim.
1—96% of the UK is not Muslim. And Sharia law exists in just five English cities as a purely civil law, legally subordinate to English law. With no plans to expand it.
2-As explained numerous times, it is British police procedure to ‘arrest’ all those involved in a burglary incident, where the burglar has been killed or injured. It is simply procedure, which allows the police to seperate the parties, and officially interview the people involved.
In almost every case, the homeowner is released within a few hours, when the evidence supports their testimony.
I myself was a victim of burglary in Sept 2008, and incident where my brother and I beat and held the suspect, with injuries to myself and the burglar. So I KNOW the reality of this issue.
It is a myth, a complete myth, that we in the UK are no allowed to defend our homes. In fact the Tory govt now, and even the Labour govt, STRENGTHENED the law in regards to homeowners right to self-defence.
3—Deprived medical care?. Rubbish. On the NHS, no one, even trivial cases, are denied medical care. You have been reading myth.
People who bang on about that ignore WHY it happened.
It happened because the British people blamed (rightly) the prewar Tory govt of getting us into the war in the first place, by failing to stop Hitler. Nobody in 1945 had anything but great admiration for Churchill as a man and as a PM, but that wasnt the issue.
The other reason is, and remember we are talking about a country exhausted and literally destroyed by war, that Labour’s vision of a ‘new Jerusalem’ was so enticing to voters, with an NHS, new housing, new infrastructure, new schools, a vision which literally sought to rebuild Britain.
The Brits were highly respectable as recent as the 80’s, under Margaret Thatcher.
It shows that total collapse happens very quickly.
1—The handgun ban was stupid, but as I have pointed out in other threads, the British public has never been a gun owning populace (highest ownership: 1.6m weapons in 1996 in a population of 60m). So most people through UK history never wanted to own one, so thats why the gun laws of the 1920’s, 1968, 1988 and 1997 passed unchallenged or actually had public support.
2—Knife crime is a serious problem here. Its our equivalent of your gun crime. So penalties are harsh for carrying or using.
You are wrong that we are not allowed to carry. We can as long as its for a valid reason.
3—Pointed sticks?. Sorry, you been watching a bit too much Monty Python?.
As usual, you get right to the heart of the matter, Catherine.
Strangely enough, I get that last bit.
Churchill was THE best man for wartime Britain. The Brits recognized this, and also recognized that he had done this job better than any other living man could have, and that the job no longer needed a Churchill.
In an odd way it was recognition of his success that paved the way for his replacement.
Hello, Windflier! Thank you. :)
It's only right and proper to acknowledge sage comments when we see them. You're welcome.
Don’t let any of them over here unless they are first examined for any hint of liberal tendencies.
Why should we kick out all the Muslims?.
The vast majority of UK Muslims are decent, law abiding people who follow their faith and are not terrorists or extremists. And what extremism there is is in certain hotspots: London, Birmingham, Bradford, Oldham. There isnt any Muslim extremism in Scotland, NI, Wales, and many parts of England. The Scots-Welsh-NI muslim communities have worked hard to make sure of that.
We didnt kick out all the Irish because of the IRA, did we?. And they have been killing us for decade upon decade....
As to guns, whilst the gun laws of 1922, 1968, 1988 and 1997 were imo unnecessary and/or stupid, the argument to bring back guns dosent wash.
Why?. Simple. The British public, contrary to recent and popular myth, have never been a gun owning public. The highest rate of ownership was 1.6m legal weapons in a 60m population in 1996, just prior to the 1997 handgun ban. The majority of the UK has never held a gun, let alone owned one. And even in ‘olden’ times, we were never gun owners.
Thats why, right or wrong, the UK public never railed against the gun laws, and even in the case of 1988 and 1997 supported the bans.
And btw, it IS legal to own guns in the UK: rifles and shotguns and certain types of handgun, as long as they are licenced.
Reports of our demise have been greatly exaggerated
“I dont want to go on th cart.”
I feel happy!
“Deprived medical care?. Rubbish. On the NHS, no one, even trivial cases, are denied medical care. You have been reading myth.”
Things will change. England must re-claim herself—it will happen but not until this generation is burned away. Wait for a new king and a new Conservative Government—maybe National Front. They were destroyed by PC—just as Russia was destroyed by Communism.
David Cameron, I thought, would be a breath of fresh air. He has turned out to be a poof.
Let’s hope for another Thatcher.
And, above all, a revival of Christianity in Great Britain.
The main problem with that is that the National Front have no real policies other than ‘send the buggers back’. The British National Party have more substance but are National Socialists in all but name. Have a look at their manifesto and tell me if you like what you see.
The only real conservative option is the UKIP, and they are seen as something of a joke.
With all due respect, I don’t think muslims can be compared to the Irish, nor can Islam be called a peaceful religion.
Thanks for the reply.
Yes, you are correct that there have been accusations and controversies over denied operations and drugs. My point was more about the general denying of medical care to British people.
My point was that the NHS by definition are duty bound not to turn anyone away. The NHS for example will deal every weekend with hundreds of drunken idiots who clog the A&E depts all over the country, and whose ‘illness’ is nothing but too much booze and and copious vomit. Or idiots who turn up at hospital expecting treatment for a cut finger or a sore throat when there are much sicker/injured people.
Certainly, there IS a problem with NICE in England denying drugs on the NHS due to ‘cost’. Not so bad in Scotland, Wales and NI.
Yes, I will admit there are cases where care has allegedly been denied, my myth remark was aimed at the (American) myth that the NHS operates now as a deathpanel healthcare system.
That certainly IS a myth. I will admit there are problems, but it is far from being a deathcare system or death panel NHS as claimed by many here.
UKIP is now the fourth largest political party in Britain. They may even be the third largest - the liberal-democrats have lost a lot of ground since they had to grow up and actually DO things, rather than complain about them.
The real problem with UKIP (apart from the fact that they dont have very much money) is that they are perceived as a one issue party. They (we - I'm a paid up member) are trying to broaden the appeal but with the EU being so pervasively evil its hard not to concentrate on their inequities.
With equal respect, if your friends and/or relatives have just been blown to pieces I suspect distinctions on the ethnic or religious affiliation of the people who did it are not very important to you.
But at the same time, your reply highlights a weakness in the system. The a&e departments do get "clogged up" by drunks and wasters and idiots who can't use a plaster, but the reason they do that is because they do not have to pay for the treatment (or rather, not pay for it directly). People abuse the system because there is no downside to doing so.
No. You are right.
After all, the Muslims here havent yet murdered 3000 British people, killed the future King’s favourite uncle, murdered a Prime Minister, worked hand in hand with the Nazis, shot two Aussies because they ‘looked British’, murdered British soldiers in Germany, attempted to blow up most of Gibraltar, murdered an American and maimed another (Harrods bombing 1983) set off bombs at a Rememberence Sunday parade, committing acts of violence since the 1850’s, and been setting off bombs in the UK and Northern Ireland since 1938....
error in my post to you: Irish Republicans did not murder a Prime Minister, they have however murdered several senior British politicians over the last 130 years, including Airey Neave, a WW2 hero, and in 1882 Lord Cavendish, the Secretary of Ireland.
As a Tory voter, I am more and more moving towards UKIP.
Yes, I agree with you there. However, I didn't say violence in the UK is being produced solely by Muslims. What I am saying---and what I surely expect just about every Freeper knows---is that Islam is a savage blood cult. The higher percentage of Muslims you have in your society, the more problems you will suffer. Look at what's going on in England now. Sharia law is being practiced, there are Muslim child rape gangs. By 2030 England will have more Muslims that Kuwait, and one in every ten Brits will be Islamic. That is a recipe for disaster, and for the death of a great nation.