Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Silencers gaining popularity among Maine gun users
bangordailynews.com ^ | 29 April, 2012 | Daniel Hartill

Posted on 06/06/2012 7:14:34 AM PDT by marktwain

TURNER, Maine — Chris Jordan rotated his safety switch to semiautomatic, aimed, and squeezed the trigger.

In his hands, the German-made submachine gun twitched as it fired a 9-mm bullet at a speed of more than 1,000 feet per second. The round had sunk safely into the sand of a nearby gravel pit wall when its sound arrived.

It resembled a sneeze.

“You don’t get the dangerous, thunderous report with this thing,” said Jordan, CEO and owner of G3 Firearms in Turner. On the far end of the barrel, a black metal cylinder seemed to make all the difference.

A moment later, Jordan slid the switch to automatic, allowing a single tug of the trigger to send a hail of bullets against the loose gravel wall.

Sneezes.

It’s that sound, or lack of it, that’s creating a sudden boom in local silencer sales.

In the 76 years between 1934, when the federal government began registering all silencer sales, and December 2010, when the most recent numbers are available, a total of 1,135 silencers were legally sold in Maine, according to the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

Those numbers may be deceiving.

Cities such as Lewiston and Auburn have logged few sales, said police chiefs in both cities. Federal rules call for each registration to be accompanied by a criminal background check, fingerprints, a $200 tax payment and the signature of the local law enforcement head.

Registration requests arrive at a rate of two or three each year, Lewiston police Chief Mike Bussiere and Auburn Chief Phil Crowell agreed. In Franklin County, Sheriff Dennis Pike said he has signed off on one silencer in his long career.

However, since 2007, Androscoggin County Sheriff Guy Desjardins has signed off on 59.

In 2007, his first year in office, requests from places including Turner, Greene and Durham totaled 4. In 2011, there were 20 registrations for silencers.

“I have no idea why they would want them,” Desjardins said. After all, Maine law bans their use in hunting, he said. “Unless they’re target shooting, who knows?”

But Jamie Pelletier, who manages J.T. Reid’s Gun Shop in Auburn, said people often drop by looking for silencers.

“People are running out of places they can shoot without bothering their neighbors,” Pelletier said. He can’t sell silencers, known in gun circles as “cans,” because his shop doesn’t have the needed Class 3 tax status. But he listens and sympathizes.

“Everything is becoming so urbanized,” he said. The days when large numbers of Mainers could target shoot in their backyards are waning, he said. People are living more closely together and the sound frightens people.

To Jordan, one of about a dozen Class 3 dealers in Maine, silencers are a growing niche.

Part of his work is education, he said. People think of silencers as devices used exclusively by movie assassins, screwed onto the ends of handguns by men wearing black gloves.

“About 30 to 40 percent of the people who come in here think they’re illegal,” Jordan said. “Maybe more.”

Even some law enforcement officials think they’re banned.

Jordan said he was once threatened by a coastal town’s police chief, who insisted that silencers could not be sold lawfully.

I said, ‘Look. I’m a licensed dealer in the state of Maine,” Jordan said. “You can’t take my silencers away from me.”

“He said, ‘You come to my town and I’m going to arrest you,’” Jordan said. “I said, ‘I’m going to win. They’re legal.’”

His most popular silencer screws onto the end of a .22-caliber rifle, a target gun.

Silencers can range from just under $300 for a small suppressor that attaches to a .22-caliber gun to $600 or more for a machine-gun silencer.

After the purchase, the application is mailed and each accessory goes under lock and key.

The ATF portion of the process often takes as long as six months to clear, Jordan said.

Federal regulations spelled out in the 1934 National Firearms Act made it difficult to buy the silencers, requiring the same background checks as short-barreled rifles and shotguns, machine guns and fringe weapons classified by a catch-all “any other weapons” category. Felons are prohibited from owning silencers. And the required $200 tax is the same $200 that was levied when Franklin Roosevelt was president.

Desjardins personally performs each background check that crosses his desk.

“I could give it to one of my detectives, but they’ve got too much work,” he said. The background checking can take two hours if the applicant has moved a lot. “If somebody has been convicted of a violent crime or I have worries about it, I don’t have to sign it.”

He has never denied an applicant, he said.

To see more from the Sun Journal, visit sunjournal.com.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Maine
KEYWORDS: banglist; constitution; me; silencer
“I have no idea why they would want them,” Desjardins said. After all, Maine law bans their use in hunting, he said. “Unless they’re target shooting, who knows?”

They are superb for home defense. Firing a gun inside a home is a recipe for destroying your hearing. Putting on hearing protection when you need every sense tuned in to what is happening, is not a great idea, unless the hearing protection is active.

1 posted on 06/06/2012 7:14:44 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

They used to be required equipment at indoor ranges in the 1950s. Kids would bring their rifles to school and shoot in the school basement after classes. Without silencers, we’d have swaths of Boomers with no hearing.

A ban on silencers is stupid and unnecessary. They help more than they hurt. It’s knee jerk, feel good garbage that got them banned.


2 posted on 06/06/2012 7:22:15 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
“I have no idea why they would want them,”

The part of my hearing loss not attributable to jet engines is because of firearms.

Suppressors shouldn't be outlawed.

/johnny

3 posted on 06/06/2012 7:22:31 AM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Strange why they would be banned for hunting. In Europe they are required for hunting. This way the local hunting preserves do not get the neighboring residents all upset hearing the gunshots.


4 posted on 06/06/2012 7:28:11 AM PDT by BobinIL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rarestia
The tax is unconstitutional, under the rationale of the US Supreme Court in US v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939).

Not that the lower courts follow the law, they emphatically don't, and if you have an untaxed suppressor, you will go to jail under the hand of the federal court system.

5 posted on 06/06/2012 7:28:24 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Jordan said he was once threatened by a coastal town’s police chief, who insisted that silencers could not be sold lawfully. I said, ‘Look. I’m a licensed dealer in the state of Maine,” Jordan said. “You can’t take my silencers away from me.” “He said, ‘You come to my town and I’m going to arrest you,’” Jordan said.

I would take the chief's challenge up. I would go into town, call him personally, and tell him I was there with my legal silencer.

6 posted on 06/06/2012 7:32:41 AM PDT by Lazamataz (People who resort to Godwin's Law are just like Hitler.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

To the author: “Dude. They’re called suppressors. Not ‘silencers’.”


7 posted on 06/06/2012 8:28:57 AM PDT by Noumenon (If people saw socialists for what they truly are, slaughter would ensue - in self-defense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Noumenon

Thanks for that. You can probably blame Hollyweird for why they are called that. Heck, I’m no weapons expert by any stretch so that’s what I thought they were called, thanks in large part to Hollyweird movies.

Glad for Freeper experts!


8 posted on 06/06/2012 8:45:22 AM PDT by Sister_T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Getting other family members to put on hearing protection when you must be focused on neutralizing a threat is ... infeasible.


9 posted on 06/06/2012 8:48:53 AM PDT by ctdonath2 ($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

« Suppressed is Best »


10 posted on 06/06/2012 9:10:19 AM PDT by ▀udda▀udd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Noumenon

http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2011/07/foghorn/aac-its-called-a-silencer


11 posted on 06/06/2012 9:26:32 AM PDT by Niteranger68 (Quit poking holes in the life raft!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson