Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tombstone Readies Picks and Shovels
Sierra Vista Herald ^ | June 7, 2012 | Dana Cole

Posted on 06/07/2012 9:02:20 AM PDT by HiJinx

TOMBSTONE — The City of Tombstone is embroiled in another dynamic showdown.

The “Town too Tough to Die” is now squaring off against the U.S. Forest Service in what could be the fight of its life, a battle over water rights.

More than 500 shovels have arrived in Tombstone from all over the country and are being stored at Tombstone City Hall. This photo was taken about two weeks ago, and the shovels just keep coming in. (Photo courtesy of George Barnes)

On Friday and Saturday, a group called the Shovel Brigade will gather in Tombstone and head to the Huachuca Mountains to make repairs to the city’s waterline, which was damaged by mudslides and boulders after last summer’s Monument Fire flooding. While the 26-mile waterline — fed by springs in the Huachuca Mountains — has been Tombstone’s main water source for 130 years, the U.S. Forest Service is refusing to allow mechanized equipment into areas to make the repairs. Citing the Wilderness Act, the forest service is concerned about environmental damage that heavy equipment could cause to wilderness areas while excavation work and rebuilding are underway.

“Twenty four springs and one reservoir located in the Huachuca Mountains make up our water supply,” said George Barnes, Tombstone’s city clerk. “We’ve been allowed to make repairs to three of the springs, but we have a long way to go before the entire water system is rebuilt. There are sections of the line that mudslides have buried under 12 feet of debris, and the forest service is requiring us to make the repairs by hand, using picks and shovels.”

That’s where the Shovel Brigade comes in. After learning about the city’s dilemma, communities across the country have been sending shovels to Tombstone, some bearing signatures and messages of support. To date, more than 500 shovels have arrived in Tombstone. And on Friday, around 1,000 people are expected to gather at the old high school football field off Fremont Street to raise public awareness about the city’s water issue. In addition, volunteers will be traveling to the Huachuca Mountains to work on the waterline, making repairs by hand, as stipulated by the forest service.

“We’ve received almost no cooperation from the federal government on this issue,” said Tombstone’s former mayor Jack Henderson, who was in the mountains doing excavation work on the line when agents ordered him to leave.

“Our story has been picked up by CNN, Fox, Rush Limbaugh, John Stossel and the Washington Examiner, not to mention towns all over the country. The Goldwater Institute has joined our fight and is representing us in court.”

In August, Gov. Jan Brewer declared a state of emergency and provided funds to help with the aqueduct’s repairs.

While the forest service has allowed Tombstone access to three of its springs, the city has not been allowed to work on the remaining 21.

U.S. Rep. Jeff Flake is currently sponsoring federal legislation that will allow Tombstone to repair the damaged water lines without going though federal permits.

In addition, Tombstone Archivist Nancy Sosa has been requested to testify before the House Natural Resources Committee on Friday regarding Flake’s bill and the challenges Tombstone has been facing.

The town’s 26-mile, gravity-fed system was built in the 1880s as the Huachuca Water Company and has been hailed “an engineering marvel.” An article that appears in an 1882 edition of the Tombstone Epitaph talks about the pipeline and its route from Miller, Marshall and Carr Canyons as it makes its way to Tombstone. In 1908 the Huachuca Water Company was purchased by A.E. Davis who sold the entire water system to the City of Tombstone in 1947. In addition, the city owns original documents showing every appropriation of the water system, with the first appropriation from Miller Canyon in 1881.

“The city’s ownership of this system predates statehood and the forest service,” said Tombstone City Councilman Steve Troncale.

“Each appropriation of water comes with a land description and map indicating the city of Tombstone owns the water rights. All of this is court ordered through sales and a declaration of ownership of property to Tombstone.”

Through the years, the system has provided an ample supply of potable water to the residents of Tombstone, along with the 400,000 tourists that visit the town annually. But now, the town is left with three repaired springs, along with one reliable well for its water. With fire season here, the ability to provide adequate water for fire suppression is a concern.

“In my opinion, the forest service has made several mistakes,” said Kevin Rudd, who was hired by Tombstone as project manager for the system’s repair work. “The first and obvious one is forest mismanagement that put Tombstone in this predicament in the first place.”

Rudd said that once the damage was done, the forest service should have allowed Tombstone into the wilderness area to “repair our system which would facilitate Tombstone’s obligation to protect its residents. Instead, they used the Wilderness Act as a tool to delay our repair process.”

Rudd also noted that the city of Tombstone began contacting the forest service about accessing damaged areas to start the repairs “long before the situation was declared an emergency” by Brewer.

“When monsoon rains began to pound the canyons in July of 2011, Nancy Sosa began contacting the forest service to let them know about our pending dilemma because she knew from experience what was coming.”

Rudd disagrees with U.S. District Judge Frank Zapata’s recent decision to deny the city’s emergency request to repair the water system. Zapata’s decision is based on the argument that “repairs to the system appear to be substantially complete.”

Those repairs, Rudd argues, are preliminary, with temporary welds holding salvaged pipe in place where the main aqueduct was blown out. Collection structures, once made of concrete and protected by metal cages were destroyed during the mudslides and are now made of temporary sand bags and plastic pipe.

“Our situation right now is precarious,” said Barnes. “If our one well goes down, or we receive minimal flow from the springs, we’re in a very bad situation.”

However, Zapata does not feel that Tombstone faces a crisis. “Claims of a drastic water emergency related to public consumption and fire needs are overstated and speculative,” he has been quoted as stating.

Troncale points to a huge restaurant fire that occurred in Tombstone about 18 months ago where the establishment, Six Gun City, burned to the ground. The fire, he said, could have destroyed the entire town.

“It was our water supply, fire department and the backup that we got from other fire districts that saved this town from complete disaster,” he said.

“The supply of water that we have right now is not adequate to fight a fire of that magnitude. If we have another fire like Six Gun City’s, this entire town could be destroyed.”

During a special Cochise County Board of Supervisors meeting on Tuesday, the board unanimously supported a resolution that calls for “…the cooperation of the U.S. Forest Service in the repair and maintenance of its (Tombstone’s) municipal water system.”

The supervisors’ support came as welcome news to Tombstone officials, said Barnes. In part, the resolution states that the forest service has impaired the ability of agents of the city of Tombstone “to make repairs to its water system by restricting access…” to the system. Concerns about the health and safety of the residents of Tombstone, along with its visitors also are noted.

In addition, the resolution supports Tombstone’s right to “immediate and unimpaired access to Coronado National Forest lands located in the Huachuca Mountains, free of federal restraint to make all necessary repairs to its water system.”

Tombstone city officials are hoping the publicity the town has been receiving, along with legislative support, will generate enough public pressure to allow the work to be completed without further delays.

“Our beef is with the forest service, not the forest,” said Barnes. “We want to re-establish what we already had.”

Henderson agrees. “With the monsoons just around the corner, we’re bracing for more damage,” he said.

“The Tombstone Shovel Brigade is just another layer of support we’ve received in this convoluted process. The good news is, we’ve already won this fight in the court of public opinion, and the state of Arizona recognizes our rights. Now we need to do is convince the federal government.”

The issue:

Boulders and mudslides from monsoons following the Monument Fire in the Huachuca Mountains have buried water lines the city of Tombstone relies on for its municipal water supply.

Tombstone officials want to use such mechanical means as bulldozers to dig and repair the water lines, but are being stopped by the U.S. Forest Service, with federal court backing.

Citing the Wilderness Act, the U.S. Forest Service will not allow the city to bring mechanized equipment into wilderness areas. The city has been ordered to make all repairs to its water system by hand, using picks and shovels.

The Tombstone Shovel Brigade has been formed, modeled after the Jarbridge Shovel Brigade of Jarbridge, Nevada in 2002. More than 500 shovels have been sent to Tombstone from all over the county, to be used to repair the city’s damaged water line, a project that will be happening on Friday and Saturday.

Shovel Brigade volunteers will be meeting at 8 a.m. at the old Tombstone High School football field on Friday and Saturday. From there, they will be traveling to the Huachuca Mountains. City officials are expecting about 1,000 volunteers to participate in the project.

TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: 2012; crushfedgov; ecofascism; envirofascism; forestservice; govtabuse; tombstone; wildernessact
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 06/07/2012 9:02:29 AM PDT by HiJinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: HiJinx

What an arrogant bunch of ba$stards in the Forest Service Bureaucracy. Some heads in the Forest Service need to roll after January 20th 2013.

2 posted on 06/07/2012 9:15:15 AM PDT by RightWingConspirator (Obamanation--the most corrupt regime since Robert Mugabe's Zimbabwe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx

As a veteran of the Jarbidge NV shovel brigade I know this task can be done, by hand if necessary.

The FS hates it when the people overcome the artificial obstacles they throw up in an effort to please some special interest that has NO actual interest in the area!

This will be a much larger project than the Jarbige road was, in addition to shovels they are going to need shelter, food, and WATER!

Please post pics of the work in progress, and once complete.
Be sure to carefully document the FS tactics, they WILL attempt to intimidate the citizens into abandoning their noble effort.

3 posted on 06/07/2012 9:16:13 AM PDT by Loyal Sedition
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx

DEFUND the Forest Service, Fish & Game, EPA and all the other useless brownshirts...

4 posted on 06/07/2012 9:18:42 AM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyal Sedition

Why aren’t the people bringing in some heavy equipment? Is it that they can’t afford it or they’re afraid of the big bad gubmint? I say bring in the dozers and get this ‘Battle of Athens’ on the road!

5 posted on 06/07/2012 9:21:22 AM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RightWingConspirator

Time to go hunting Smokey Bear...

6 posted on 06/07/2012 9:27:47 AM PDT by Average Al (Forbidden fruit leads to many jams.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx

One would think that 1,000 people armed with shovels would cause far more environmental damage than would a few bucket wheel excavators and bulldozers.

7 posted on 06/07/2012 9:29:52 AM PDT by Fiji Hill (Deo Vindice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
Finally, a post with huevos!

We don' need no stinkin' Forest Service.

8 posted on 06/07/2012 9:34:58 AM PDT by Aevery_Freeman (Typed using <FONT STYLE=SARCASM> unless otherwise noted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost

The leftist aka progressive tree huggers are claiming power equipment cannot be used. Some wilderness law prevents modern equipment. They have to use tools around before some 1860 or later date.

9 posted on 06/07/2012 9:38:36 AM PDT by DMG2FUN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
Another episode of Difi (Diane Not-so-finstein) read THE GREAT GOLD HEIST

The Desert Wilderness Protection Act
10 posted on 06/07/2012 9:39:32 AM PDT by Foolsgold (L I B Lacking in Brains)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost

I’m with you.

Tombstone oughta go in there with a f’n D-12 Caterpillar ‘dozer and a 10 cu. yd. excavator and be prepared to give the “Rachel Corrie” to any stupid Federal moron that tries to get in the way.

The needs of the many outweigh the grievances of the one.

Then they should rename the line in honor of the departed; mostly as a deterrent to future Federal harassment.

11 posted on 06/07/2012 9:40:57 AM PDT by HKMk23 (GOPe 2012 MITT HAPPENS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx

Simply set fire to the forest during the dry season when the wind is brisk.

12 posted on 06/07/2012 9:41:45 AM PDT by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aevery_Freeman

We don’t need the TSA in our Forests.

13 posted on 06/07/2012 9:47:30 AM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx

Tucson has water. They can dig a trench to Tucson and tap into the central canal.

14 posted on 06/07/2012 9:57:46 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx

Another of Obummer’s “shovel ready” jobs?

15 posted on 06/07/2012 10:08:46 AM PDT by USMCPOP (Father of LCpl. Karl Linn, KIA 1/26/2005 Al Haqlaniyah, Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx

The city should just go ahead and do it anyway and when the Feds show up, have the Sheriff throw their asses in jail.

16 posted on 06/07/2012 10:36:50 AM PDT by headstamp 2 (Liberalism: Carrying adolescent values and behavior into adult life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
DEFUND the Forest Service, Fish & Game, EPA and all the other useless brownshirts

Return federal lands to private ownership and the forest service would have nothing to regulate

17 posted on 06/07/2012 11:00:56 AM PDT by Cowman (How can the IRS seize property without a warrant if the 4th amendment still stands?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Another of Obummer’s “shovel ready” jobs?

That would make a GREAT sarcastic campaign.

18 posted on 06/07/2012 11:29:57 AM PDT by Oatka (This is America. Assimilate or evaporate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx

How ‘bout a picture of a pile of rifles to go with the pile of shovels?

19 posted on 06/07/2012 11:30:29 AM PDT by AlexisHeavyMetal1981 ("Viva Cristo Rey ! ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AlexisHeavyMetal1981

Legally, there can’t be any “federal” lands, once a state enters the Union.

All states must enter on an equal basis with the original 13.

The federal government cannot impose any conditions on a state for admission, other than those accepted by the original 13.

(When the feds wanted Oklahoma as a state, provided Norman was made state capital, the Supreme Court
said that provision was not constitutional.)

Likewise, the feds cannot admit a new state “provided” that the state permit the feds to retain control of various “federal” preserves—forests, monuments, etc.

Ergo, all the “federal” preserves in the West actually are the property of their respective states. (There can’t legally be any “federal” forests.)

So, Arizona can make the rules for its own forest lands.

20 posted on 06/07/2012 12:01:43 PM PDT by CondorFlight (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson