Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill Clinton is Back and it's No More Mr. Nice Guy
Townhall.com ^ | June 8, 2012 | Donald Lambro

Posted on 06/08/2012 7:57:38 AM PDT by Kaslin

WASHINGTON - Bill Clinton continues to distance himself from some of Barack Obama's policy positions, firing opinions that have ticked off the White House and the president's reelection campaign.

The former president lobbed his latest missile Tuesday when he urged Obama to temporarily extend George W. Bush's tax cuts that are due to expire the end of this year, including the two top tax rates for the nation's wealthiest income earners.

That was rank heresy, as far as the White House was concerned.

But when Clinton used the word "recession" to talk about the economy, that violated the party line that we are in "a recovery," something many if not most Americans do not believe, according to the Gallup Poll.

Obama has steadfastly opposed the lower tax rates for Americans earning more than $250,000 and has shown no sign of backing away from his position, despite opposition from Republicans who want the tax cuts made permanent.

The end of the year expiration date has put the nation on a perilous course that many economists say is headed toward a fiscal cliff at a time when the economy is slowing down and unemployment is rising.

Not only will everyone's income taxes go up in January, but so will the Social Security payroll tax which has been temporarily reduced to 4 percent to boost the economy but will revert back to 6 percent, unless it, too, is extended.

At the same time that taxes will rise sharply, $1.2 trillion in automatic spending cuts will also take place if Congress can't work out an end-of-the-year deficit-cutting plan.

But Clinton said in an interview on CNBC's "Closing Bell" with Maria Bartiromo that a long-term agreement most likely can't be reached in the lame-duck session after the election and will have to be put off until sometime next year.

"What I think we need to do is to find some way to avoid the fiscal cliff, to avoid doing anything that would contract the economy now, and then deal with what's necessary in the long-term debt-reduction plans as soon as they can, which presumably would be after the election," he said.

"They will probably have to put everything off until early next year. That's probably the best thing to do right now," he added.

Republicans cheered Clinton's remarks, saying they supported the GOP's position to keep the Bush tax cuts in place right now. "Even Bill Clinton came out for it, before he was against it," House Speaker John Boehner said.

The White House declined comment, but it's clear that Obama's advisers and campaign strategists considered his remarks "off message." Nameless officials "pointed out that Obama has said repeatedly that he would not extend the Bush tax cuts for higher earners," the Washington Post reported.

But it seemed clear the president's advisers were not happy about his unsolicited advice and communicated that to Clinton's office. Not long after his interview, the former president's spokesman Matt McKenna released a brief statement explaining his remarks, but not backing away from what he said.

"In the interview, he simply said that he doubted that a long-term agreement on spending cuts and revenues would be reached until after the election," the statement said.

"Later, in the interview, he said government spending levels were higher and revenues were lower than they would normally be because there was a recession and we're still living with the aftermath of it."

Even so, the statement insisted Clinton believes "we're not in a recession, even though we'd all like [economic] growth to be higher."

Whether that soothed the White House remains unclear at this point, but feelings between Obama and Clinton have not exactly been warm and cozy for sometime now.

When Obama and his campaign high command were bashing his

Republican rival, Mitt Romney, on his record as a business turnaround investor at Bain Capital, Clinton went to Romney's defense.

He called Romney "a man who's been governor and had a sterling business career."

But these criticisms of Obama's political and policy strategies are not isolated instances.

In a book on economic policy that Clinton wrote last year, he didn't mince words about the Obama economy that was then in its third dismal year and barely growing at a feeble 1.7 percent. "We're in a mess now," Clinton wrote.

Even the book's title was a blunt rebuke of Obama's handling of the economy: "Back To Work: Why We Need Smart Government for a Strong Economy."

He seemed to be suggesting that in the third year of Obama's presidency, he still hadn't put the country back to work, that his economic policies were not smart, and that the economy was still weak.

What Clinton especially disliked was Obama's attacks on Wall Street executives and wealthy big business CEOs. "Many of them supported me when I raised their taxes in 1993, because I didn't attack them for their success," he wrote at the time.

And then there was this comment from the political master that had Obama's high command rolling their eyes: "It is heartening that people all over the world want to pursue their version of the American

Dream but troubling that others are doing a better job than we are of providing it to their people."

While Obama last year was still pursuing his ideological obsession to raise income taxes in a still-anemic, high unemployment economy, Clinton was publicly bashing that policy, too.

"I personally don't believe we ought to be raising taxes or

cutting spending, either one, until we get this economy off the ground," he said last fall in an interview with Newsmax.

Clinton still thinks, his latest statement notwithstanding, that the Obama economy still hasn't gotten off the ground and we're likely to hear more from him on that score in the weeks to come.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bho2012; x42

1 posted on 06/08/2012 7:57:42 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I don’t trust this guy, but have you noticed how much better he can think with Hillary pretty much out of his life?


2 posted on 06/08/2012 8:03:23 AM PDT by July4 (Remember the price paid for your freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: July4
I disapprove of the headline reference.


3 posted on 06/08/2012 8:08:49 AM PDT by Salamander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

4 posted on 06/08/2012 8:09:07 AM PDT by ILS21R (John Locke: When the social contract is broken, the people must revolt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
“What Clinton especially disliked was Obama’s attacks on Wall Street executives and wealthy big business CEOs. “Many of them supported me when I raised their taxes in 1993, because I didn't attack them for their success...”

“O” has only a worm's eye view of economic facts AND is a malicious creep for whom encouraging success and hard work constitutes ideological and political anathema

5 posted on 06/08/2012 8:13:33 AM PDT by SMARTY ("The man who has no inner-life is a slave to his surroundings. "Henri Frederic Amiel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Bill Clinton is Back and it’s No More Mr. Nice Guy....

What? When was Slick Willie ever a “nice guy?”
Did I miss something?


6 posted on 06/08/2012 8:13:45 AM PDT by bill1952 (Choice is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salamander


I approve of the headline reference.
7 posted on 06/08/2012 8:18:45 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana ("You forget, it isn't who you claim, but instead, who claims you. We don't claim you!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Clinton SO wants Obama to fetch him some coffee.


8 posted on 06/08/2012 8:21:03 AM PDT by MomwithHope (Buy and read Ameritopia by Mark Levin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ILS21R

The correct caption to that photo is:

“Did someone say ‘Colombian hookers?!?’”


9 posted on 06/08/2012 8:21:49 AM PDT by lump in the melting pot (Communism - a social experiment which, for ethical reasons, should not be performed on live humans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
No more Mr Nice Guy?

Bill has never been Mr Nice Guy? More like a rattlesnake with the rattles removed. He's always been brutal but the uninformed don't see it coming.

10 posted on 06/08/2012 8:22:12 AM PDT by TruthWillWin (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other peoples money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Bill Clinton deserves to be in Ft. Leavenworth in an orange jumpsuit, along with his harridan spouse.

However, if he can help bring down Zippy, we’ll welcome his services.


11 posted on 06/08/2012 8:23:48 AM PDT by exit82 (Democrats are the enemies of freedom. Be Andrew Breitbart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ILS21R
"Can I get a 'hallelujah' ? "                                            "Oh jeez, not THIS crap again..."

12 posted on 06/08/2012 8:33:54 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

Never get tired of that picture, it just says so much about these guys.


13 posted on 06/08/2012 8:36:04 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: All

First of all, it’s not Presidents who put people to work. WEALTHY people put people to work.

The wealthy aren’t going to put people to work when they can’t invest. They don’’t dare invest when they know that business regulations and tax policies can break them, over night.

They may be wealthy, but they aren’t unsinkable, and they too stand to loose their homes, properties, businesses and everything they’ve worked for all of their lives.

Zero’s tax policies ARE ruining this nation and they have been since he’s been in office. Everything is unstable so don’t expect any recovery until it does stabilize.

I absolutely NEVER liked Clinton, but in this particular case, he’s absolutely right. If the man can deflect votes from Zero due to Zero’s own stupidity and bullheadedness, then he will have done one thing right, deserving credit where credit is due.

Businessmen/women WANT to advance, but their hands and finances are tied as long as Zero is at the wheel. As long as their hands are tied, those in need of jobs will suffer.


14 posted on 06/08/2012 8:40:10 AM PDT by PrairieLady2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Is this the same Bill Clinton who balanced four budgets only with the help of Newt Gingrich and the Contract With America, plus got to ride the economic boom of the “dot com” era?


15 posted on 06/08/2012 8:55:32 AM PDT by From The Deer Stand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exit82

AMEN!!!!


16 posted on 06/08/2012 8:59:27 AM PDT by Ann Archy ( ABORTION...the HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: From The Deer Stand

Bubba knows how to surf on public opinion and events. It’s instinctual for him. That’s what he did as president and that’s what he’s doing now.


17 posted on 06/08/2012 9:01:58 AM PDT by Gideon7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: From The Deer Stand

Thank you.

Newt is underrated and under appreciated. History will be very kind to Newt, which will serve as a well earned embarrassment to his critics- all much lesser men.


18 posted on 06/08/2012 9:10:48 AM PDT by RitaOK (No Romney! Few are unafraid, but I thank God for the few. We are the resistance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Perhaps Bill Clinton is more concerned with how history will view and record his pronouncements during the ongoing dismantling of America's economy than he is with what the wrecking crew and its hapless leader think.
19 posted on 06/08/2012 9:29:50 AM PDT by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

What a pic. Some things never change. Bill Clinton walks into the room and sucks up all the oxygen. Look at Obama, he’s already gasping and getting faint.


20 posted on 06/08/2012 9:31:11 AM PDT by elcid1970 (Nuke Mecca now. Death to Islam means freedom for all mankind. Deus vult!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: From The Deer Stand
Is this the same Bill Clinton who balanced four budgets only with the help of Newt Gingrich and the Contract With America, plus got to ride the economic boom of the “dot com” era?

During the election cycle of 1992, George H.W. Bush lost his job after Bill Clinton hammered him relentlessly for having caused the “worst economy of the last 50 years.”

In fact, as CNN’s Brooke Jackson has reported: “Three days before Christmas 1992, the National Bureau of Economic Research finally issued its official proclamation that the recession had ended 21 months earlier. What became the longest boom in U.S. history actually began nearly two years before Clinton took office.” See (See http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/10/31/jackson.recession.primer.otsc/).

By the same token, Clinton is generally perceived as having a stellar economic record during his own presidency, in spite of the fact that the economy was already starting to decline during the last year of his term after the stock market crashed in March 2000.

According to a report by MSNBC: “The longest economic expansion in U.S. history faltered so much in the summer of 2000 that business output actually contracted for one quarter, the government said Wednesday in releasing a comprehensive revision of the gross domestic product. Based on new data, the Commerce Department said that the GDP — the country’s total output of goods and services — shrank by 0.5 percent at an annual rate in the July-September quarter of 2000.” See: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3676690/ns/business-stocks_and_economy/t/gdp-figures-revised-downward/.

21 posted on 06/08/2012 9:42:44 AM PDT by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Gideon7
Excellent, concise observation of the Clinton modus operandi.
22 posted on 06/08/2012 9:48:49 AM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana

I’ve done my level best to eradicate the memory of that from my mind.

[aaack!]


23 posted on 06/08/2012 10:31:41 AM PDT by Salamander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rmBCVJoTK90

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0eQuRvXGinM


24 posted on 06/08/2012 10:36:24 AM PDT by Salamander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson