Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Missouri Sen : McCaskill down to all 3 GOP challengers. Steelman by 12.
Rasmussen Reports ^

Posted on 06/08/2012 8:20:19 AM PDT by sunmars

Missouri Democratic Senator Claire McCaskill’s three leading Republican challengers all now earn 50% or more of the vote in matchups with her.

The latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of Likely Missouri Voters shows former State Treasurer Sarah Steelman with the widest lead. She’s ahead of McCaskill by 12 points, 51% to 39%

(Excerpt) Read more at rasmussenreports.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS: 112th; loser; mccaskill; missouri; mo2012
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: donozark
Sarah Steelman has been endorsed by Tea Party. Several months ago. She rocks!

Good news. Thanks.

41 posted on 06/08/2012 10:07:56 AM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

Akin is a solid convervative. He is also a long time home schooler. See link for a good article on him.

http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/8e745c07-4751-5923-8336-915807344aca.html


42 posted on 06/08/2012 10:55:50 AM PDT by rwa265 ("This is My Beloved Son, Listen to Him.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

“.....can be more destructive and difficult to dislodge than an ineffective and obvious moron, out to lunch, loony Democrat such as Boxer.....”

Unfortunately Boxer has been in the Senate since the early 90’s. Never underestimate the stupididy of the American electorate.


43 posted on 06/08/2012 11:10:51 AM PDT by Forty-Niner (The barely bare, berry bear formerly known as..........Ursus Arctos Horribilis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sunmars

When is the Missouri primary and/or decision as to who the Senate is?


44 posted on 06/08/2012 11:14:16 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sunmars

When is the Missouri primary and/or decision as to who the Senate is?


45 posted on 06/08/2012 11:14:22 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JLAGRAYFOX
"They don’t come much dumber the Claire McCaskill"

Yes they do. Ever heard of Patty Marray from WA state?

46 posted on 06/08/2012 11:54:29 AM PDT by Buffalo Head (Illigitimi non carborundum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: sunmars

Me too. McCaskill is an embarrassment to the people of Missouri.


47 posted on 06/08/2012 12:17:13 PM PDT by Maryhere ("HE comes to rule the earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwa265

That was an excellent article. I am glad to get the information. Most homeschoolers are conservative on other issues like abortion and gay marriage. I do not automatically go for the Tea Party candidate. They have made mistakes before. Alot of them went for Ron Paul and that to me was very short-sighted and stupid. And, Steelman is not my favorite. I think she acts a little too affected for my tastes. This isn’t a movie role the candidates are trying out for and her appearances on TV have seemed very TVish to me. I have liked Akin all along even though I am not in his district. He is a good family man and we need good people to represent Missouri in DC.


48 posted on 06/08/2012 12:43:41 PM PDT by Maryhere ("HE comes to rule the earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


49 posted on 06/08/2012 12:44:19 PM PDT by kingattax (99 % of liberals give the rest a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: sunmars

This is exceptionally good news, thanks for sharing it!


50 posted on 06/08/2012 12:44:38 PM PDT by TonyInOhio (Headwinds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sunmars

Better call in Michael J Fox.. Obama cannot help her.


51 posted on 06/08/2012 12:49:30 PM PDT by SMGFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sunmars

Thanks be to God! McCaskill was outfront in her adoration of and solicitude for the Marxist, outfront in promoting him and a major player during his campaign and into his Intro To Marxism 101, forced to course through the Republic.

Clara was fat and happy until the people awakened and found her hiding their light bulbs. Well, their light bulb is on now.

I am very thankful to God and for all the prayerful who have been on their knees begging Him to intercede.


52 posted on 06/08/2012 1:09:14 PM PDT by RitaOK (No Romney! Few are unafraid, but I thank God for the few. We are the resistance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

” It’s amazing how polls are so accurate all of a sudden. “

Truer words were never spoken. One thing is clear, the elite media has turned considerably, to a shocking degree, willing to make their die hard Marxist pal interviewees look terribly foolish and quite out of step.

They have even stopped doing Axlerod any favors for the smoke he blows. And Clinton, they COVERED that quite objectively! Unbelievable. They actually entertained what he said, except for the few outright Marxists among them, his common sense point was repeated and not mocked.

The worm is turning. Things are so bad that we knew it was going to take some liberal help to get this guy out of here.
Many of them are scared too.


53 posted on 06/08/2012 1:15:23 PM PDT by RitaOK (No Romney! Few are unafraid, but I thank God for the few. We are the resistance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: sunmars; fieldmarshaldj; Impy; Clintonfatigued; BillyBoy; randita; GOPsterinMA; unkus; ...

Rasmussen polled all three Republicans against McCaskill, and all three have big leads:

Sarah Steelman (R) 51%
Claire McCaskill (D-inc) 39%

John Brunner (R) 51%
Claire McCaskill (D-inc) 41%

Todd Akin (R) 50%
Claire McCaskill (D-inc) 42%

http://davidwissing.com/?p=18252

I think it’s time we changed McCaskill’s first name to “Blanche.”


54 posted on 06/08/2012 1:17:10 PM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican; Impy; Clintonfatigued; BillyBoy

I was looking at some primary polling data on the Republican side, but all I can locate is Dem-leaning PPP polling. As of 5/28, it shows Steelman narrowly in 1st with 28%, but she has declined from 40% since last year’s polling (and down 4% since January). Businessman John Brunner is now in 2nd place and rising at 25%, up from 18% in January. Rep. Todd Akin is in 3rd place with 23%, unchanged from January (but a slip from 2nd place), and overall down from 29% last year, his highest.

Still, the nomination is Steelman’s to lose. My worry remains, however, that the party establishment will viciously attack her as they did when she ran in the primary for Governor in 2008, something more unlikely with Akin or Brunner as the nominee. I endorsed Akin, but I have no particular problems with the other two, as far as I can tell.


55 posted on 06/08/2012 1:43:31 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (If you like lying Socialist dirtbags, you'll love Slick Willard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: sunmars; Reagan69
oh no, i’d need a hazmat suit and a chemical scrub before i ever go near that 7th level of hell.

Along with that, it's horrible to navigate.

56 posted on 06/08/2012 2:10:33 PM PDT by wastedyears ("God? I didn't know he was signed onto the system.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican; fieldmarshaldj; GOPsterinMA; NeoCaveman; randita; BillyBoy; Clintonfatigued; ...

This would speak against any Senate “trend” toward the rats.

Although she is clearly now in more danger than Tester in MT or any other rat incumbent. I guess it’s just her. She doesn’t have much talent when it comes to staying popular I guess.


57 posted on 06/08/2012 3:06:04 PM PDT by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

From what I’ve seen in my research, Sarah Steelman is the PREMIER candidate as far as having conservative, tea-party values. She would be a great Senator and is not one that would “go along to get along”. We need more folks such as Sarah Steelman in the Senate.


58 posted on 06/08/2012 3:29:27 PM PDT by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: sunmars
How could a face like this lose?

Photobucket

59 posted on 06/08/2012 3:36:18 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Hecks

“Akin is the most knowledgable but Steelman might have a gender advantage against McCaskill.”

Yeah, polls seem to confirm it.
Glad to hear she’s a conservative.


60 posted on 06/08/2012 3:58:07 PM PDT by WOSG (Anyone But Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson