Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arctic discovery: Massive algae bloom raises crucial (Global Warming) questions
Los Angeles Times ^ | June 8, 2012 | Amy Hubbard

Posted on 06/09/2012 4:21:59 AM PDT by Zakeet

NASA has revealed its discovery of a massive algae bloom under the slowly diminishing Arctic ice -- a finding that made scientists' eyes pop. But does this never-before-seen phenomenon change the fate of this microscopic algae?

Not long ago, this crucial plant life -- which produces much of the world's oxygen -- was reported in a century-long tailspin.

Here's the back story.

The same year that NASA researchers launched the Icescape expedition to the Arctic -- the project that resulted in NASA's astounding new discovery -- there was a dire report on the world's phytoplankton.

A Canadian team said in the journal Nature, as The Times reported in July 2010, that the world's phytoplankton had been disappearing at a rate of about 1% a year for the previous 100 years.

"A global decline of this magnitude? It's quite shocking," Daniel Boyce, Dalhousie University marine scientist and lead author of the 2010 study, told The Times.

Phytoplankton -- the basis of the marine food chain -- "are key to the whole ecosystem," he said. "In terms of climate changes, the effect on fisheries, we don't know exactly what these effects will be."

Could his latest discovery of a mass of phytoplankton in the Arctic signal a turnaround for this crucial organism?

The jury's out.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: algae; arctic; environment; globalwarming; gorebalism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

You right wing nuts need to realize that this is undoubtedly bad news ... because even though plankton reduces carbon dioxide ... this newly discovered batch is emitting its own toxic gasses ... and increasing global warming ... and are killing fish ... and enlarging the hole in the ozone layer ... and destroying rain forests ... and causing a hydrocarbon spill in the fragile arctic environment ... and leading to mass extinctions ... and it's all because you selfish pigs continue to drive your SUV's and use power lawn mowers ... which is why we need much more government funded research ... and a carbon tax!

1 posted on 06/09/2012 4:22:20 AM PDT by Zakeet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

As for myself and some others I speak to, science has lost it’s credibility. The cataclysmic rise of the oceans did not happen, the significant loss of Himalayan ice didn’t happen. Now we are not surprised that we are not all doing to die from the loss of phytoplankton. Global warming extremism and a few pharmaceutical disappointments have caused a bit of distrust.


2 posted on 06/09/2012 4:30:31 AM PDT by momincombatboots (Back to West by G-d Virginia. 2016 starts today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

” ... because even though plankton reduces carbon dioxide ... this newly discovered batch is emitting its own toxic gasses ... and increasing global warming ... and are killing fish ... and enlarging the hole in the ozone layer ... and destroying rain forests ...”

You could be Gore’s press secretary!


3 posted on 06/09/2012 4:34:41 AM PDT by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
You right wing nuts need to realize that this is undoubtedly bad news ... because even though plankton reduces carbon dioxide ... this newly discovered batch is emitting its own toxic gasses ... and increasing global warming ... and are killing fish ... and enlarging the hole in the ozone layer ... and destroying rain forests ... and causing a hydrocarbon spill in the fragile arctic environment ... and leading to mass extinctions ... and it's all because you selfish pigs continue to drive your SUV's and use power lawn mowers ... which is why we need much more government funded research ... and a carbon tax!
Excellent!
4 posted on 06/09/2012 4:37:48 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Obama gave a directive to NASA head, its mission is ‘moooooslem outreach’.

Keep JPL as academic affiliate, shrink 90% of rest of NASA, the work they do nowadays doesn’t amount to a lot of beans.


5 posted on 06/09/2012 4:46:58 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
"A Canadian team said in the journal Nature, as The Times reported in July 2010, that the world's phytoplankton had been disappearing at a rate of about 1% a year for the previous 100 years.

"A global decline of this magnitude? It's quite shocking," Daniel Boyce,"

Ok Danny boy.. help me out here.

1. Either you suck at math or the phytoplankton is now gone.

Or...

2. That the percentage of biomass is reduced by 1% per year over the total 100 years based on some made up arbitrary number of what you think the total mass was to begin with.

Or...

3. You're just talking out your butt.

I'm picking number 3.
6 posted on 06/09/2012 4:47:19 AM PDT by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: momincombatboots

I was watching the Michael Jackson documentary “This Is It” the other night and I had seen it before but just caught it the other night when he was standing on the stage in a pep talk and prayer with his dancers and crew telling them “We have 1 year to turn it all around and save the world or there is no going back and we will be finished”

Hey Mike...Mike? Mike? Still here? No?

We are.


7 posted on 06/09/2012 4:49:49 AM PDT by My Favorite Headache (In a world where I feel so small, I can't stop thinking big. Vote Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
NASA has revealed its discovery of a massive collection of American SUVs under a slowly diminishing cloud cover -- a finding that made scientists' eyes pop. But does this never-before-so-many-in-such-a-small-area phenomenon seal the fate of mankind.. er, personkind?

Yes! warned aged 1960s spoiled brat Al Gore

8 posted on 06/09/2012 4:52:12 AM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Here’s another, I think more informative, link to a ScienceNow article printed in the Anchorage Daily News: http://www.adn.com/2012/06/08/2496664/scientific-expedition-discovers.html


9 posted on 06/09/2012 4:53:29 AM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: momincombatboots

Greenland, man, GREENLAND. Its glacier had been receding.

/Uh hummmmm. Switch off my imitation of GW alarmist mode.

Please don’t lump science and scientists in general with ambitious people with political agenda (a small fraction of science community).

Those studies weren’t ‘science’ and the methodology/application not ‘scientific’.


10 posted on 06/09/2012 4:56:22 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bigh4u2
Well he is talking our of his but however ...oh I just got up and don't want to do the math. It's kind of like reverse interest. Say you start with 1 dollar and increase at 1 percent per year.

At the end of the first year you have 1 dollar AND 1 cent. The next years interest is earned on the 1 dollar and 1 cent so you make a bit MORE.

Now do the same thing but in reverse.

My head hurts.

11 posted on 06/09/2012 4:56:53 AM PDT by prisoner6 (Right Wing Nuts bolt the Constitution together as the loose screws of the Left fall out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bigh4u2

Far be it from me to defend this drivel but, it could be the writer means each year the count is down 1% from the year before - a geometric progression that does not end in zero - kinda like walking half way to the wall with each step.

But a projection like this requires that you accurately measure the phytowhaterver count every year. To my knowledge, there was not/is not a yearly plankton census commencing in 1912.

These people are so unhappy when the sky isn’t falling.
What a dismal life.


12 posted on 06/09/2012 5:07:23 AM PDT by bossmechanic (If all else fails, hit it with a hammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: momincombatboots
science has lost it’s credibility. The cataclysmic rise of the oceans did not happen, the significant loss of Himalayan ice didn’t happen.

See!

Electing O'bama was the right thing to do!

He TOLD us it would stop if he was elected!

13 posted on 06/09/2012 5:13:14 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Never seen before is NOT the same as never happened before.


14 posted on 06/09/2012 5:15:41 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: momincombatboots

You’re right. Science IS going through a crisis of credibility. I’m sure you’ve read about the staggering numbers of peer reviewed journal articles filled with made up data, hidden relevant data, and articles filled with just plain junk.

Science as seen through the dirty lenses of Big Media is even more trashy.


15 posted on 06/09/2012 5:20:42 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

OMG, OMG, Mother Nature did something we didn’t predict and don’t understand but it is bad and we are all going to die if we don’t get a huge grant to study it. /algore rant


16 posted on 06/09/2012 5:21:29 AM PDT by CPOSharky (zero slogan: Expect less, pay more. (apologies to Target))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

George Walker Bush
Global Warming Believers

Coincidence? I think not.


17 posted on 06/09/2012 5:21:50 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (ABO 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Did anyone notice that losing 1% of photoplankton a year for a hundred years adds up to 100%?


18 posted on 06/09/2012 5:33:19 AM PDT by DaxtonBrown (http://www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bossmechanic

1% a year for a hundred years equals damn near gone.


19 posted on 06/09/2012 5:35:57 AM PDT by csmusaret (I will give Obama credit for one thing- he is living proof that familiarity breeds contempt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

The best part of the article is the picture of al with a tree growing out of his head. The photographer knew exactly what he/she was doing.


20 posted on 06/09/2012 5:39:39 AM PDT by huldah1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson