Posted on 06/12/2012 6:06:58 AM PDT by IbJensen
“The second time I went out to California to attend Mohammad Hassan Chandoo’s graduation from Occidental College, Obama was enjoying the lavish lifestyle being financed by his friend and roommate at the time - Hassan Chandoo. The wealthy patron provided Obama access to big houses, lavish parties & had him dressed in the slickest clothes. I could have sworn they were both Gay & wealthy.”
Those were some of the initial observations by Dr. John C. Drew, PhD, on his second encounter with Barack Obama who was attending Occidental College at the time.
Much has been speculated about Barack Obama’s college days and with good reason. These years are a mystery in his past. We know very little other than that by many account witnesses, many of his early days in college were reminiscent of the type of partying and drug use that took place inside the walls of the famed NYC nightclub; Studio 54.
There is however Dr. John C. Drew and his chance encounter with Obama at Occidental College. A chance encounter because the only reason that Barack Obama chose to attend the small Liberal Arts College was because of a girl he met from Brentwood while vacationing in Hawaii.
Drew who described himself as an enemy of the government and a Marxist during his days in college, claims that not only was Obama part of the “brotherhood & revolution” - he embraced Marxist-Leninism. He was basically a hard-core Marxist in college.
That was the reason Drew had flown out to Occidental College in the first place. It appears that the girl that Drew was dating at the time also knew Obama. She wanted Drew to meet this man that shared similar philosophical views. Barry, as he preferred to be called in those days - would later get together with Drew & his girlfriend to discuss Marxism over drinks and dinner and a lot of partying afterwards. Some of the revelations that came to light during this interview session with Obama are startling to say the least.
One of the interesting observations that Drew made during his visits with Obama was the lack or presence of African Americans within Obama’s circle of friends. “I got the sense that Obama did not have deep roots in the African American community”.
Drew also thought that Obama was money hungry and may have married Michelle because he thought she was rich based on the fact that her brother was a wealthy investment banker.
On his second trip to California, Drew says that he went out to meet with Obama and some school professors to make the case against Marxism being a good fit in the US. He recalls that even after presenting Obama with evidence on his theory, Obama turned against him. He let me know in so many words that he was an intense Marxist proponent.
Drew says that Obama was in complete 100% agreement with his Marxist college professors who wanted a revolution in this country to overturn the power structure. He was consumed with the notion of wealth redistribution & more affirmative action programs to bring about less inequality and more income equality. He espoused the John Rawls Theory of Justice and his ‘veil of ignorance theory.
This "veil" is one that essentially blinds people to all facts about themselves that might cloud what notion of justice is developed.
"No one knows his place in society, his class position or social status, nor does anyone know his fortune in the distribution of natural assets and abilities, his intelligence, strength, and the like. I shall even assume that the parties do not know their conceptions of the good or their special psychological propensities. The principles of justice are chosen behind a veil of ignorance."
Drew saw Obama as a young man in a hurry. Soon after his friend Hassan Chandoo graduated, Obama realized that his fancy & rich lifestyle would not be financed anymore. That is when he decided to move east and attend Columbia University. This is where his college days became hazy. No one that attended Columbia during that same period of time can recall much about the slim black kid with the half afro.
From there Obama eventually moved on to Harvard and after graduating, headed out to Chicago to become a Community Organizer. A move that Drew says is a logical career step for a revolutionary coming out colleges like Occidental and Columbia in those days. Next step in the progression was to become a college professor and finally and adjunct professor at the university of Chicago where he used his position to argue on behalf of the socialist perspective & revolution.
There he talked about how the Constitution guarantees negative liberties but not the positive liberties that you would see in a society that redistributes its wealth so that it was more equal.
After his stint as an adjunct professor he took the next step in the natural progression of an ideologue. He entered the world of politics with the blessing of Alice Palmer and kicked off his political career in the living room of one Bill Ayers.
So as we get a glimpse at what Barack Obama was like during those early days, we begin to get a clear picture of how he is continuing with ideologies that he was so passionate about.
We can begin to understand his dislike for the rich and his decision to tax anyone making over $250,000. We begin to understand why he would say that he would rather be a good one-term President than sell-out his principles. The guilt of not being able to move the Progressive cause forward would be too much of a cross to bear.
We have seen the actions that he has taken to try and move this cause forward. We have been witness to the many people that he has put in his administration that are bordering on Marxist.
John Drew’s telling glimpse into the mind of an ideologue is very telling.
In a recent poll taken, 73% of Americans believe that Obama is a Socialist. Fifty-three percent of Democrats have a positive view of Socialism. This is not something to be taken lightly. Do not underestimate this believe. It appears that they may have the right man at the top to carry forward the cause.
No one really knows much about this President and any information that might shed light on his past is important. He talks about transparency all the time, well why not start with your own past?
I think this meeting with John Drew shows what many of us have suspected all along. Obama is an ideologue. Whether you choose to accept it or not is up to you, I want to make sure that people have the other side to the story and then its up to thme to make up their minds.
What American voters have wrought is a nightmare of gigantic proportions...thanks mainly to our two party system, but also to the clueless unwashed!
Surprise, surprise, surprise!! Instead, he gets The Mooch who probably married Barkie because she thought HE had money.
And a news media full of inept cowards & lying marxists.
And their punishment is that they are stuck with each other forever!! Boy, do they deserve it!
Actually I think the article is at least party wrong. IIRC Obama went straight into community organizing out of Columbia. It was from that ‘job’ that he was offered a slot at Harvard Law School (funded in a rather shady factor, with admissions that scream Affirmative Action). Upon returning to Chicago he joined a law firm that specialized in Civil Rights cases (shakedowns).
“I could have sworn they were both gay and wealthy.” Actually only one of them was wealthy.
She thought he had money and didn’t know Bark Obama liked to eat dogs.
What American voters have wrought is a nightmare of gigantic proportions...thanks mainly to our two party system, but also to the clueless unwashed!
_______________________________________
I disagree. This nightmare is MAINLY the result of ignoring God and increasingly becoming an amoral culture.
Half-Afro? He just does everything half-assed, doesn’t he?
Maybe we should start calling him The Occidental President.
And maybe HE is the original moocher of the family.
OK it boils down to this. Obama was living with a rich gay lover, when that ran out he decided to go to Columbia University.
Who paid for that? Who paid for him to go to Harvard?
What were his grades, was it affirmative action that he was accepted? Why doesn’t anyone remember him from Columbia?
How did he get the Community activist job in Chicago, Who introduced him to the terrorist Bill Ayres? Why did he give up his law license?
I could go on,the big question is where is the Media ——Woodward and all those other journalist assholes who should be doing their jobs?
No worries there - they conveniently redistributed our wealth to accomplish their goal of being wealthy! Fixed the problem...
Most interesting to me is that Obama was into John Rawls. Obscure to most, I found Rawlsians infiltrated the socioeconomic impact studies at Yucca Mountain and have known how radical these people are.
” Instead, he gets The Mooch who probably married Barkie because she thought HE had money.”
As a practical matter, they were a tag team. She got her absurdly overpaid hospital job simply due to his being a state senator who could influence health care matters—a kind of quid pro quo amounting to hundreds of thousands of dollars over time that would not have been possible had they tried to give him a similar amount in cash directly etc. Likewise, she ended up benefiting considerably from his book sales related to two highly fictionalized accounts of his life. She gave him street cred with the Black community which likewise was instrumental in his political success.
So, all in all, a very good and productive match for a couple that is so highly disdainful of financial success in America yet never hesitated to live high on the hog every step of the way. And now they get to do so in large measure on the taxpayer’s dime!
“Obscure to most, I found Rawlsians infiltrated the socioeconomic impact studies at Yucca Mountain and have known how radical these people are.”
Actually, Rawls was pretty mild compared to Marx. He fully endorsed a meritocracy so long as resultant inequalities were designed to favor those with the least. Most people interpreted his theory as essentially a theoretical justification for liberal Democratic thinking of the 1960’s, i.e., let the market work, but then selectively redistribute wealth to lift some at the bottom. His vision entailed far less redistribution than would a pure Marxist and unlike Rawls, a pure Marxist wouldn’t be comfortable with private property or profits at all.
So in that regard, Obama’s enthusiasm over Rawls is surprising. He actually seems much more radical than Rawls.
I agree with your analysis, except that from my perspective a number of these people used Rawls as a means of continuing Marxist thought under an academic veneer of legitimacy that wasn’t as threatening.
Canada Free Press
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/12999
(snip)
Every member of the Supreme Court, every member of congress, every member of the Joint Chiefs, most members of the DOD, CIA, FBI, Secret Service and state run media, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, PBS, NPR, MSNBC, Fox and print news, knows that Barack Hussein Obama does NOT meet Article II – Section I constitutional requirements for the office he holds. By his own biography, there is NO way he can pass the test. The hard evidence is so far beyond overwhelming, it is ridiculous.
(snip)
But not ONE member of America’s most powerful people will dare confront Obama and his anti-American cabal on the subject. The Constitution does NOT stand.
(snip)
Half of the people you expect to stop this insanity are quiet co-conspirators in the silent coup. The other half is paralyzed by fear, motivated only by political self-preservation.
(Snip
Americans keep asking what they can do because they see that none of their leaders are doing anything to stop the demise of their beloved country. It’s the right question, because those leaders are NOT going to stop this thing.
(Snip)
Who will save freedom?
A brave few… This is how it was in the beginning, how it has always been and how it will be.
(Snip
Dr. Orly Taitz, Phil Berg and Gary kreep, all of whom have made defending the constitution and the American way of life a personal ambition in the absence of any constitutional leadership.
If the American people fail to get behind these brave few who are seeking peaceful redress, all the peaceful options will evaporate as if they never existed. We will return to a pre-1776 America overnight.
obumpa
back to the future ping!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.