Skip to comments.Shellie Zimmerman arrested on suspicion of perjury (George Zimmerman's wife)
Posted on 06/12/2012 1:37:18 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
click here to read article
We need to pass a law that removes immunity for judges. In the meantime, are we able to contact Judge Lester and give him a piece of our minds?
Are prosecutors immune? Who is able to file a motion to have Angela Corey’s law license revoked? Are we able to contact her and give her a piece of our minds?
Back in January of 2010 I said that if we didn’t stand up for the rule of law, we would soon see “The Dark Knight” right here in the USA. We’re rapidly approaching that point.
I believe this is the MILD version of how Obama intends to impose martial law. Bill Clinton is right: we have 6 months to save the world. If the Lord doesn’t hand us over to our own depravity.
Hell, he ASKED HER about the money from the website! It's right there in the transcript!
“telling a judge you are penniless when you know you have more than 100K in the bank IS lying. And that is what she has been arrested for.
Had these 2 lovebirds just frikkin told the truth to the judge about the money, both could be enjoying a margarita tonight on the veranda.”
I’’’ clean up the old Army saying—”Assumption is the Mother of all Foul Ups”. I don’t suppose you listened to (or read) ALL the relevant testimony before you jumped into your “hang ‘em—they MUST deserve it” mode here? Try actually doing that.
Perhaps someday the wheels of justice will pick you out to attempt to grind you to a pulp and I suspect you’ll hope that folks don’t make incorrect assumptions about you deserving what you get.
Have you enjoyed any margaritas with Nifong or Corey lately? You might feel right at home with them.
Evidence , coded phone calls= guilt.
Charges are based on phone conversations.
Who were the Cryptologists and what code were the Zimmermans using.
George,”when I get out we should get a thousand miles away.”
Shellie, “ No , we should go twice that far.”
The conclusion is they really had $200,000.00 in the bank.
“Horse Hockey!” to quote Colonel Potter!
Keep posting it, Jaded. Eventually a few might read it instead of just mouthing off.
Unfortunately, the imperial judge refused to give GZ and SZ an opportunity to explain what they were talking about. They have a right to confront their accusers and have time to respond to charges. It’s called due process.
And since the prosecutors edited out Shellie’s offer to call the brother-in-law to get an exact amount of the PayPal account in their motion to revoke GZ’s bail, I wouldn’t trust them as far as I could throw them.
Yep, in the transcript she's asked how much money is in the PayPal acct, she says she doesn't know but her brother-in-law does, and offers to get him. The judge does not follow up. She did not perjure herself.
And she TOLD him how to find out about it, and neither he, nor the prosecutors, bothered to take her up on her offer.
No, what’s next is “take the plea deal or we’ll release your wife into the general prison population.”
Waiving “right to speedy trial” was a _bad_ move.
> They dont gave 100k in the bank. They had a PayPal account which they apparently arent clear about how can be used.
> You dont tell a judge you have assets when you dont know in what manner they can be legally employed.
Their big mistake, IMHO, that they didn’t tell their own lawyer about the monies. He could have advised them how to handle the question from the judge.
” Is she guilty because shes the spouse of George Zimmerman? Is that how it works?”
I’m really beginning to hate this judge. He is determined to GET ZIMMERMAN no matter how, no matter what.
” They dont gave 100k in the bank. They had a PayPal account which they apparently arent clear about how can be used.
You dont tell a judge you have assets when you dont know in what manner they can be legally employed.”
Correct, and where is Zimmerman’s lawyer, anyway?
I watched this entire testimony live.
Shellie specifically stated
she was in a undisclosed location.
she did know of the online fundraising account.
she not know the balance of the account while sitting on the stand.
she could contact George’s brother (or brother in law) who had direct access to the account.
she had not had contact with George’s brother in almost a week.
she could give the phone number to the judge, prosecutor and her lawyers, immediately.
How could she have perjured herself? I do not think the prosecutor ever asked a leading question such as “does the account have more than 10 grand in it?” or anything of the sort with a specific dollar amount.
We should all be very afraid.
How can anyone not see what the state is attempting here? How many people will now hesitate to defend themselves in similar circumstances after what they see what happens to those who dare to?
Do you know that they did not tell their lawyer? I suspect that they did tell him and he was aware. I also think the fact that the original representing attorneys withdrew because of the web site and the donations was known to O’Mara from the outset. O’Mara has screwed up twice IMO first with the passports and now with this. He should have prepped and or represented his clients better.
No, they just want to stop her one-woman crime spree, and prevent her from going to other bail hearings and perjuring herself there. I wonder what she’ll say at her bail hearing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.