Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran 'designing nuclear submarine'
The Telegraph ^ | June 12 2012 | Staff

Posted on 06/12/2012 2:23:15 PM PDT by moonshot925

"Initial steps to design and build nuclear submarine propulsion systems have begun," Admiral Abbas Zamini, the technical deputy navy chief, told the agency.

"All countries have the right to use peaceful nuclear technology, including for the propulsion system of its vessels," he said.

Iran's navy "needs the (nuclear-powered) propulsion system to succeed in realising very long-distance operations."

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iran; nuclear; submarine
Our nuclear subs use 97.3% enriched uranium.

The announcement of this project should probably serve to justify uranium weapons grade enrichment to allegedly fuel the reactor of the submarine.

1 posted on 06/12/2012 2:23:20 PM PDT by moonshot925
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: moonshot925

A’hmanutjob gave the project away when he ordered the screen doors and made a point of getting them made special to stand up to salt water.


2 posted on 06/12/2012 2:26:02 PM PDT by jessduntno ("Newt Gingrich was part of the Reagan Revolution's Murderers' Row." - Jeffrey Lord, Reagan Admin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moonshot925

. . . and obviously, a nuclear sub with “long-range” capabilities is solely for “peaceful purposes”, right?? How transparent can they be, here?


3 posted on 06/12/2012 2:33:24 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moonshot925

Thing is, how small can they make it. From what I read their plant is something like the size of a WalMart.


4 posted on 06/12/2012 2:33:43 PM PDT by SkyDancer ("Talent Without Ambition Is Sad - Ambition Without Talent Is Worse")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

5 posted on 06/12/2012 2:36:10 PM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: moonshot925

Yes, when Iran gets around to building a totally NEW Navy, all vessels will have glass bottom hulls, why?

So they can see the OLD Iranian Navy.


6 posted on 06/12/2012 2:47:46 PM PDT by mkjessup (Eternal Vigilance (aka FReeper Tom Hoefling) has my vote for President in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moonshot925

They probably didn’t know what to do with the drone so they took the wings off and are going from there with the help of the Chinese.


7 posted on 06/12/2012 2:48:33 PM PDT by huldah1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moonshot925

They have no experience at all about building subs, much less building a nuke sub. The attempt would be an abysmal failure. This is either more chest beating or a cover for further enriching uranium or both.


8 posted on 06/12/2012 2:50:57 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moonshot925

Fat chance.

They couldn’t even build a decent diesel electric sub. HAd to buy the few they had from Russia and they are the older Kilos at that.

The ones they have built are truly “midget” subs displacoing no more than 100 tons.

Their largest warship that they have built...and they have the audacity to call the thing a destroyer...is a corvette sized vessels weighing in at about 1500 tons when modern frigates are 3000-5000 tons and modern destroyers are 6000-9000 tons.

So I do not think a nuclear attack sub is in the cards for them building any time soon. And I do nt believe Russia even would sell them one of their really old ones.

Now China’s naval growth is a different matter all together.

The Rising Sea Dragon in Asia
http://www.jeffhead.com/redseadragon/


9 posted on 06/12/2012 2:54:03 PM PDT by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free, never has been, never will be (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moonshot925
A little undersea “stuxnet” should be very interesting,
10 posted on 06/12/2012 2:59:13 PM PDT by Happy Rain ("Political Correctness forces people to say one thing and vote another.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy Rain

As soon as their 1,000 case order of FLEX SEAL arrives they plan in finishing the project.


11 posted on 06/12/2012 3:02:06 PM PDT by spawn44 (mu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: spawn44

FYI.......

I bought a can of the stuff and sealed a small periodic roof leak that has plagued me for years


12 posted on 06/12/2012 3:05:18 PM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Present failure and impending death yield irrational action))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: spawn44

“I don’t care who you are, that’s FUNNY!” Larry TCG


13 posted on 06/12/2012 3:15:22 PM PDT by GOYAKLA (Recall/ Impeachment Day, November 6, 2012. FUBO, same for RINOs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: spawn44

14 posted on 06/12/2012 3:20:19 PM PDT by Neidermeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: moonshot925

Laughable.

They would have to buy so many parts from western vendors. It’s not like they are going to invent a programmable process control industry inside Iran.

So they buy PLCs from the west. Perhaps some pressure vessels. Some coating technology. Valves and switches and gauges.

They are so ripe for defective, sabotaged equipment. They have to buy from a supply chain that leaves plenty of unpstream room for deadly tinkering.


15 posted on 06/12/2012 3:37:59 PM PDT by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moonshot925

Ahmadinnerjacket and the mullahs don’t have the technology. If they do try to build a real bomb and not just a dirty one it’ll likely be the zip gun equivalent. Good news for everyone else, bad news for the civilians close by. A nuke sub? Right after plaid monkeys fly out of my butt and break dance.


16 posted on 06/12/2012 3:57:16 PM PDT by EandH Dad (sleeping giants wake up REALLY grumpy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert; txhurl

Ping.


17 posted on 06/12/2012 5:04:09 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Anyone can draw plans—puting one together—even a good WW II U-boat-— would be beyond them. This is for domestic Propaganda—How about a Nuclear airplane?


18 posted on 06/12/2012 5:04:55 PM PDT by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Torpedo bait!


19 posted on 06/12/2012 5:16:05 PM PDT by reg45 (Barack 0bama: Implementing class warfare by having no class!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Forward the Light Brigade

They were touting a new Iranian produced fighter a couple of years ago. It proved to be nothing but rebuilt 35-40 year old F-5. Now the F-5 is a nasty little fighter in the hands of a good pilot, but I doubt the abilities of their pilots.


20 posted on 06/12/2012 6:17:23 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: moonshot925

We had to replace your version of a title with the original published title found at the linked source.

We’re attempting to reduce duplicate threads and ask everyone to use published titles only without alteration. Just copy and paste the title found at the source.

Thank you.


21 posted on 06/12/2012 7:09:49 PM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson