Skip to comments.
Holder Refuses to Provide Testimony on Kagan’s Involvement in Obamacare
cnsnews.com ^
| 6/12/12
| Terence P. Jeffrey
Posted on 06/12/2012 5:54:14 PM PDT by ColdOne
These are three of the eight questions that Sessions submitted to Holder on Nov. 15, 2011 to be included as part of the official record of Holder’s testimony in an oversight hearing that the Senate Judiciary Committee held on Nov. 8, 2011. Sessions is a senior member of the committee.
Holder did not provide the committee with a formal response to Session's questions until June 7, 2012—seven months after Sessions submitted them.
When he finally did officially respond, Holder did not answer any of the questions.
Instead, in responding to each, he simply referred the Judiciary Committee to a letter Assistant Attorney General Ronald Weich had sent to Sessions on Feb. 24. This letter, in turn, responded to a letter Sessions had sent to Holder on Jan. 31 noting that Holder had not yet answered the questions that Session had submitted in November.
Weich’s February letter informed Sessions directly that the Justice Department would decline to answer his questions to Holder about Kagan’s involvement in Obamacare.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: holder; kagan; obamacare; obamastaffers; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
1
posted on
06/12/2012 5:54:21 PM PDT
by
ColdOne
To: BuckeyeTexan
That's what subpoenas are for.
2
posted on
06/12/2012 5:57:14 PM PDT
by
Clintonfatigued
(Obama and Company lied, the American economy died)
To: Clintonfatigued
H0lder should be waterboarded regarding his involvement in OKC.
3
posted on
06/12/2012 5:58:57 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: ColdOne
WHEN IS THIS MAN GOING TO BE LED AWAY IN HANDCUFFS?????
4
posted on
06/12/2012 6:08:40 PM PDT
by
Jerrybob
(Truth -- the new hate speech.)
To: ColdOne
Didn't Kagan help write that law?
5
posted on
06/12/2012 6:08:51 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
To: Clintonfatigued
Considering that he ignores subpoenas, nothing would be gained. ;-)
6
posted on
06/12/2012 6:14:41 PM PDT
by
doc1019
(Voting for the better of two evils is still voting for evil.)
To: Jerrybob
hopefully around noon 1/21/13
7
posted on
06/12/2012 6:50:08 PM PDT
by
Chode
(American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: doc1019
He ignores a proper soepena, you send the Capital Police and Sgt. at Arms over to his office and frog march his ass to jail until he complies with the order. In the meantime you draw up articles of impeachment and push the Senate to remove him.
8
posted on
06/12/2012 6:58:59 PM PDT
by
Jim from C-Town
(The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
To: Jim from C-Town
Never happen ... nobody wants to piss off the DOJ or the WH by doing anything close to this and Holder knows it. I wish it would happen, but it won’t.
9
posted on
06/12/2012 7:04:17 PM PDT
by
doc1019
(Voting for the better of two evils is still voting for evil.)
To: ColdOne
It’s time to stop farting around with this guy.
What will it take to get someone to move on him?
10
posted on
06/12/2012 7:04:58 PM PDT
by
Venturer
To: doc1019
That is why Boehner and Cantor have to go. Pussies!
11
posted on
06/12/2012 7:10:38 PM PDT
by
Jim from C-Town
(The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
To: doc1019
If only we had real leaders... but we are stuck with two huge manginas... boner and mcconman.
LLS
12
posted on
06/12/2012 7:27:23 PM PDT
by
LibLieSlayer
(Don't Tread On Me)
To: ColdOne
Yet another sign of the wonderful Obama regime - an Attorney General who refuses to obey the law.
To: ColdOne
I swear, I honestly think the guy could pull a gun out and shoot someone during these hearings, and nothing would be done. Just pathetic.
14
posted on
06/12/2012 7:53:14 PM PDT
by
Marathoner
(If the choice was Obama vs. Satan I'd have to flip a coin.)
To: Jack Hammer
Yet another sign of the wonderful Obama regime - an Attorney General who refuses to obey the law. This current communists empire is exempt of current law and they make up new laws that will protect their corruption.
To: Clintonfatigued; Lurking Libertarian; JDW11235; Clairity; TheOldLady; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; ..
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.
16
posted on
06/13/2012 7:05:45 AM PDT
by
BuckeyeTexan
(Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
To: Clintonfatigued; Lurking Libertarian; JDW11235; Clairity; TheOldLady; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; ..
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.
17
posted on
06/13/2012 7:06:06 AM PDT
by
BuckeyeTexan
(Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
To: Venturer
He has an impenetrable melanin-based impeached shield, just like 0bama.
18
posted on
06/13/2012 7:09:00 AM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
To: ColdOne
To: Jerrybob
WHEN IS THIS MAN GOING TO BE LED AWAY IN HANDCUFFS?????
That would be the same time his boss is led away in handcuffs - NEVER.
20
posted on
06/13/2012 8:25:15 AM PDT
by
Cheerio
(Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson