Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘RAPING THEIR INNOCENCE’:
theblaze.com ^ | 06/14/2012 | Billy Hallowell

Posted on 06/14/2012 2:15:38 PM PDT by massmike

A disturbing story is making its way out of a small community in Washington State, where residents are outraged over a school lesson that was delivered to fifth-grade children. During a sex education class led by the Onalaska Elementary School principal, graphic descriptions of oral and anal sex were purportedly delivered.

According to Fox News’ Todd Starnes, the 11-year-old students were being given a lesson on HIV-AIDS. However, the lesson took a bizarre turn when a student reportedly asked about other forms of sexual activity. At that point, the principal then delved into subjects many would deem too advanced for the children.

While the school hasn’t offered comment, Superintendent Scott Fenter defended the principal’s actions, claiming that she only gave “factual information” and “no demonstrations.“ Fenter also claims that the lessons that were offered came from ”state-adopted curriculum.”

“In reality, she stuck to the curriculum,” the district leader told Seattle’s Q-13 Fox News. “It’s pretty difficult to talk about STDs or sexually transmitted diseases without explaining what that is, or how it’s transmitted.”


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: homeschool; moralabsolutes
Full title:

‘RAPING THEIR INNOCENCE’: PARENTS OUTRAGED AFTER SCHOOL PRINCIPAL ALLEGEDLY TEACHES 5TH GRADERS ABOUT ORAL & ANAL SEX

1 posted on 06/14/2012 2:15:42 PM PDT by massmike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: massmike

At age 75, I’m too young to hear about that stuff!


2 posted on 06/14/2012 2:18:41 PM PDT by basil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

You know what, if the principal also told them that disease and infection are more easily spread through anal sex, I have no problem with it.


3 posted on 06/14/2012 2:22:41 PM PDT by Melas (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

The Principal probably got his rocks off perverting these kids minds.

Get used to it, teachers feel they have more right to tell your kids about sex than you do.

I remember my dad telling me when I was going to an FFA convention back in 1957,that was out of state—my first real long trip alone —to stay out of the public toilets as much as I could because sick perverts lingered there to pick up youngsters and other perverts.

Best advice that can be given to young men.


4 posted on 06/14/2012 2:24:09 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

Onalaska is in Wisconsin, not Washington.


5 posted on 06/14/2012 2:24:09 PM PDT by MichiganCheese (It's now or never!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

Educrats..........God forgive me for how much I loathe these vermin.


6 posted on 06/14/2012 2:24:44 PM PDT by RightOnline (I am Andrew Breitbart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichiganCheese

Looks like there’s one in Washington,too.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Onalaska,_Washington


7 posted on 06/14/2012 2:30:49 PM PDT by massmike (The choice is clear in November: Romney or Caligula!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MichiganCheese

Onalaska Elementary School
540 Carlisle Ave.
Onalaska, WA 98570
(360) 978-4111

Public, PK-5

http://www.greatschools.org/washington/onalaska/1307-Onalaska-Elementary-School/


8 posted on 06/14/2012 2:32:14 PM PDT by massmike (The choice is clear in November: Romney or Caligula!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MichiganCheese

Don’t know about Wisconsin but Lewis County, Washington State, has an Onalasky.


9 posted on 06/14/2012 2:33:14 PM PDT by bobby.223 (Retired high up in the mountains of the American Redoubt and it's a GREAT life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Melas

Exactly.


10 posted on 06/14/2012 2:34:10 PM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: massmike
"I think the principal handled it appropriately at the time; she only gave factual information, no demonstrations," [Superintendent Scott] Fenter told NWCN.com.

What?!? Did the principal run out of time when the bell rang? Was she going to demonstrate the various techniques in class the next day?

11 posted on 06/14/2012 2:37:57 PM PDT by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike
Poor, poor children.

I wonder how they teach it? That little girls must be subservient to the boy? That if you are a little boy and your coach approaches you, you must submit to his demands?

Sickening.

12 posted on 06/14/2012 2:44:33 PM PDT by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike
“In reality, she stuck to the curriculum,”

And there's your problem right there. Parent should be in-your-face interested in the curriculum that's being taught at school. Any school. Demand to see it. Not ask. Demand.

13 posted on 06/14/2012 2:47:49 PM PDT by Noumenon (If people saw socialists for what they truly are, slaughter would ensue - in self-defense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

All about normalizing pagan/Satanic worldview in the future generation.

The conditioning and brainwashing has to be done early to warp their Natural formation-—to make it perverse.

This is Marxist ideology of radical egalitarianism to destroy the concept of biology and family-—to destroy the idea of the family unit and “mother” and “father” to destroy Christian Ethics and Western Civilization-—so that our God-Given Rights in our Constitution can be jettisoned.


14 posted on 06/14/2012 3:04:09 PM PDT by savagesusie (Right Reason According to Nature = Just Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike
While the school hasn’t offered comment, Superintendent Scott Fenter defended the principal’s actions, claiming that she only gave “factual information” and “no demonstrations.“ Fenter also claims that the lessons that were offered came from ”state-adopted curriculum. ...In reality, she stuck to the curriculum,” the district leader told Seattle’s Q-13 Fox News. “It’s pretty difficult to talk about STDs or sexually transmitted diseases without explaining what that is, or how it’s transmitted.”

Which is why you also have your principals describe the specific, graphic details of abortion, too - right, Superintendent Sh!thead?

15 posted on 06/14/2012 3:04:15 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

If Washington State had any gumption left..
That guy would get a “talking to” in the school or teachers rest room..

You know a couple of fathers that care...
And are willing screw this guys head on right..


16 posted on 06/14/2012 3:04:41 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

NEA unionoid lefties teaching 10 year-olds about sex.. what could possibly go wrong?


17 posted on 06/14/2012 3:05:49 PM PDT by AAABEST (Et lux in tenebris lucet: et tenebrae eam non comprehenderunt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Melas

Those ideas pervert young minds. Such unnatural acts would never occur to children of this age unless they were sexually molested or emotionally disturbed. It is the deliberate sexualization of children—focusing them on sex acts instead of gaining Wisdom. They are not equipped to deal with the idea of sex acts until puberty which is plenty of time for parents to inform them about the intimacy and morality of the sex act. Schools have no business with a topic of such intimacy and that which should be private. They remove morality from the sex act. Freud and Rousseau knew it was damaging to children during the latency period to be forced to think of sex-—by being molested either physically or in the above manner-—emotionally.

To destroy the innocence of children this age-—perverts their normal formation. All sexual perversions are caused by emotional/physical trauma in childhood. Experts note that mystery and awe are necessary elements in forming healthy long-term relationships and this destroys the mystery and awe and makes the act repulsive. To equate the sex act with feces. Such a sick, Satanic thought being forced on immature minds. I would kill people who did this to my boys—it is that destructive to their worldview and minds.

Worldview—reality-—is being formed and these perverts are making some unnatural act—as a given—natural. It perverts the meaning and dignity of the sex act which dehumanizes people-—reduces man to a base animal with no morality or meaning.

This creates a Pagan/Satanic worldview where there is no morality in sex acts and therefore, all sex acts are natural and ok and of equal worth-—it is a lie and destructive to the human race and civility and health.


18 posted on 06/14/2012 3:17:38 PM PDT by savagesusie (Right Reason According to Nature = Just Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: massmike

This has been going on for a long , long time...

A similar incident forced my wife and to pull all our children out of public school to start home schooling them...It was actually illegal at the time to do so...

This happened in Arlington Texas in 1984.....

Long story made much shorter....child brings home a release slip for a two week hygiene health course...

I’m thinking why does my kid need permission to learn about Washing and keeping clean.....

Sent the note back with a NO but will reconsider if I could review the material the kids would be covering....I was actually a lot more curious about what could be so important they needed my permission for my kid to be in the class

Bottom line it was a graphic lesson on homosexuality.....On how not to get aids when engaging in said behaviors

He was in the fourth grade....I was the only parent that even questioned a thing....

Yes, our school systems have been corrupting our youth mind for a long long time...


19 posted on 06/14/2012 3:21:42 PM PDT by Popman (When you elect a clown: expect a circus...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: savagesusie

I’ll repeat myself. As long as the principal taught them that anal sex is an avenue of disease, I have no problem with it.


20 posted on 06/14/2012 4:03:12 PM PDT by Melas (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Melas

Anal Sex should not be in an innocent child’s vocabulary. Only traumatized children would ever “know” about such a sick, unnatural idea.

A child’s worldview is warped-—their whole reality—when you teach them “mature adults” do such things. It is like pagan Greece-—when sodomizing boys was “good”. It was normal. They even had Zeus raping the beautiful boy, Ganymedes, in their myths-—and it was “normal”.

Ideas have consequences—that is why parents are designed to protect not only the bodies of their children, but their minds. Putting sick ideas into children, warps their reality—it creates Charles Manson who was sodomized when young. Warps their understanding of healthy relationships.

It took centuries to remove “sodomy and pederasty as “good”—for they have always gone together since it is a learned and cultured behavior.

Christianity removed the common practice from Western Civilization and developed the idea of “innocence” in childhood. It was a novel idea. They are trying to destroy God and bring back Satanic acts-—which included child sacrifice and orgies with children.

Know who wanted the innocence—respected until Sex Ed in the 70’s—of children removed-—the public schools. Why?
http://centurean2.wordpress.com/2010/12/16/radical-georg-lukacs_to-achieve-the-communist-utopia-lukacs-launched-a-graphical-radical-sex-education-program-promoting-free-love-and-promiscuity/

If you erase morality and sex-—which anal “sex” does-—you destroy the normal, natural sexual formation in children. It fixates them and focus on sex is unnatural during the latency period (6-12). They will be like the little boys in Afghanistan who think sodomy is fun and can’t wait to belong to a harem and have one when they grow up.

I repeat-—childhood needs to be kept innocent of such an intimate, powerful urge—until they have the experience and emotions to deal properly with the information—with maturity that children because of age never have. It just warps their perceptions of men and women and makes sex disgusting when they are at an age when it should be mysterious and awe-inspiring—since it is all about creating life. Anal “sex” destroys the morality and meaning of sex for children.


21 posted on 06/14/2012 6:38:03 PM PDT by savagesusie (Right Reason According to Nature = Just Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: savagesusie

I remain unmoved, yet felt you deserved some sort of reply to your verbose, albeit continually recycled comment. Let’s just say that we (you and I) are done here. After all, it’s unlikely that the principal actually told the students that anal sex was as risky as it truly is, thus alleviating the conditions of my approval in the first place.


22 posted on 06/14/2012 9:32:32 PM PDT by Melas (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Melas

Understood—but you are devoid of any understanding of Freud and Rousseau and Christian Ethics concerning healthy childhood development. It was my major. All three noted for optimal emotional development the essential sexual innocence of children during latency period— 6-12. That means no “Sex Ed” which Lukacs designed-—a Marxist concept to sexualize children and destroy morality, particularly Christian Ethics.


23 posted on 06/14/2012 9:47:41 PM PDT by savagesusie (Right Reason According to Nature = Just Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: savagesusie
Understood—but you are devoid of any understanding of Freud and Rousseau and Christian Ethics concerning healthy childhood development.

Oh, you'd be surprised. I'm well versed in Freud, Piaget, Erikson, et al. Philosophers like Rousseau, admittedly to a much lesser degree, though not totally unfamiliar.

What separates you and I is that you're a Christian, and I am not. I thought I was for a long while, but deep down I knew that I really just couldn't believe. I was just assuaging my own mortal fears with what I believed at the time was faith. To this day, I actually envy Christians in that regard. I wish I could suspend my disbelief, but I cannot, and I know I cannot.

Well, that and you think that everything under the sun is the result of a Marxist plot, and I don't personally give Marxists near as much credit.

24 posted on 06/14/2012 10:08:53 PM PDT by Melas (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: basil

Really. My dad passed away and I miss him so...but when this crap comes up, I am no thankful he’s not here to see it. He would be heart sick that Americans have turned their children over to full blown, aggressive perverts.

If I were you, I would not even read these articles. You know enough about who is who and what is what in the never ending culture war. We are truly struggling with the dark side in America. And we are not winning.


25 posted on 06/14/2012 10:35:03 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Melas

Ha ha! Actually, Atheist plot —now pushed chiefly by Marxist “dialectic materialism”. There has been an effort, since the Enlightenment—Voltaire and others, to “Kill God”-—which culminated with the German Postmodernists in the 1800’s who eventually through Fabianism established themselves in all prominent Western Universities. It can be traced—the curricula is documented—starting before John Dewey and all his Socialist/Leftist friends—all involved with textbooks and Foundations and publishing companies.

People always wrestle with Faith. Atheism takes as much —if not more—”faith” than Christianity. Agnosticism is the only belief which can be based on no “Faith”. Science theories take as much or more “faith” than Christianity.

I was not always a Christian—I was an Atheist at times, but it made life pointless and really unhappy. Christianity is Joy. Truly.

This book really cleared up my thinking-—although other books by CS Lewis are tremendous. You might be interested in Abolition of Man also-—CS Lewis saw the destruction of Classical Education in England and predicted its current godless state which Theodore Dalrymple (psychiatrist) brilliantly describes in his essays
.
http://www.amazon.com/The-Question-God-Sigmund-Meaning/dp/074324785X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1339737680&sr=8-1&keywords=question+of+god

Sorry if I offended you again, but just trying to help. I always keep an open mind and love learning. All of my studying in the last 8 years has opened up an entirely new understanding of the world for me. I feel like the person who was able to crawl out of the cave in Plato’s Republic. :) When you return with all the knowledge you’ve collected, it really is frustrating trying to convince people that shadows are not what they seem. In fact, you can’t convince them. Their reality is what they see.


26 posted on 06/14/2012 10:59:59 PM PDT by savagesusie (Right Reason According to Nature = Just Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: savagesusie

I’m not an atheist. I would agree that something from nothing is the ultimate expression of faith. I hesitate to use the term agnostic, because it implies that I would be open to all possibilities, and I am not. I’m more of the opinion that human understanding is limited, it was always limited and it will always be limited. I’m comfortable with some things simply being beyond my ability to comprehend.


27 posted on 06/14/2012 11:06:58 PM PDT by Melas (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Melas

I would wholeheartedly agree with you. Human understanding is limited and always will be limited. But the 19th and 20th Century belief being forced in US schools and law, that Faith and Reason can be separated, is bizarre and not possible. It is the irrationality of—dare I say it-—Marxism.


28 posted on 06/14/2012 11:27:25 PM PDT by savagesusie (Right Reason According to Nature = Just Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson