Romney Really Takes It to Obama

Rush Limbaugh.com ^ | June 14, 2012 | Rush Limbaugh.com

[spokeshave]

And for those who would deny a vote to Romney...remember this is who will take your vote.

I am an American Soldier...defender of freedom against tyranny

and when I enter the valley of death

and the agent of Satan appears at my shoulder

I will be resolute and fear no evil

And my Lord in heaven will guide my sword.

[scram2]

By not voting for Romney you allow a vote for Obama to stand which otherwise would not. Therefore you are actually helping him to get re elected.

That is a very, very bad thing.

[scram2]

"...and will vote for Romney IF it looks to be close enough to matter here in PA."

Really? What is your idea of "close"? Suppose it were 2% and the polls showed Romney trailing by 3%? Imagine if there were a whole lot of people in PA just like you and ALL of them stayed home because the polls showed Romney trailing by 3 points? Suppose also that the number of people staying home is actually enough to make Romney the winner but instead he loses because some push poll paints a false picture of the candidates position in the race? Just suppose.

[stpio]

“By not voting for Romney you allow a vote for Obama to stand which otherwise would not. Therefore you are actually helping him to get re elected.

That is a very, very bad thing.”

~ ~ ~

In these times, sin isn’t sin anymore that includes the gravest sin, abortion. Not in God’s eyes.

Romney is a pro-abort, if you vote for him, you have cooperated with his evil, abortion in RomneyCare.

Your vote for Romney becomes a mortal sin on your soul.

That is a very, very, bad thing.

Don’t do it.

[GlockThe Vote]

Your principals give us Obama again. I’m sure god will look fondly upon that.

[scram2]

Yours is an interesting argument to which I would reply in this way.

Romney is pro abortion, I concede. However Obama is also pro abortion and on top of that so much more that we all despise him for. The president, any president can really not do anything to change the Roe V Wade ruling. By refusing to vote for a candidate based on something he is powerless to change even were he so inclined, you will be in fact voting for the re election of a really bad dude.

Elected Rep need to be continually pushed, prodded and coerced if necessary to do what WE believe they should do just as was done when the changes were proposed in the immigration laws several years ago. You will recall at the time there were so many calls to Washington at the time the switchboards went down. The measure was defeated because of our action then and other changes can be made in the same way.

We have seen a decided swing in public sentiment AWAY from abortion in the past several months which shows we can accomplish our goals if we just keep on keepin’ on.

[airborne]

Thanks for your concern n00b. But I really don't care to debate the definition of “close”.

“Close” is whatever I think it is, and is subject to change when I want it to.

[scram2]

"Thanks for your concern n00b. But I really don't care to debate the definition of “close”.

I'm not at all concerned with what you want to discuss or that you do not seem to know the the definition of "close" in the context of the discussion, whatever gave you the idea I was?

I was merely attempting to point out a scenario you obviously hadn't thought about. Is it that which has made you so angry? How unfortunate.

[airborne]

I was merely attempting to point out a scenario you obviously hadn't thought about.

Obvious to you perhaps.

And you can rest assured, I wasn't angered by your post. Slightly amused, but just barely.

[scram2]

And you can rest assured, I wasn't angered by your post."

LOL, of course you weren't. I can't imagine where I ever got that idea. Silly me.