I’m guessing the judge will rule - in effect - that Presidents only have to enforce laws they personally agree with, if they’re Democrats, anyway.
That this directly contradicts the oath of office they take before the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court, will be ignored by the court.
I hope I’m wrong. In any event, the case will be appealed.
Can the president refuse to enforce any law?
I'd love to hear the explanation behind this statement.