Skip to comments.MUNRO: Obama ignores questions about controversial de facto amnesty decision
Posted on 06/15/2012 5:22:56 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
President Barack Obama declined to take any questions from reporters about his controversial and significant decision to offer a de facto amnesty to at least 800,000 foreigners aged 15 to 30.
The president turned and walked away from reporters at the end of an early afternoon address in the White Houses Rose Garden, even though two reporters called out questions about his decision.
The announcement of the decision comes at a time of record unemployment among low-skilled workers, Hispanics and African-Americans.
For example, less than 50 percent of younger African-Americans have full-time jobs, according to data provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Unemployment among Hispanics, youth and African-Americans rose in May, according to the BLS.
Obama justified his immigration decision by saying it is supported by business lobbies.
The president has often used this no-questions strategy when making important or poll-boosting announcements. (VIDEO: Reporter explains his Rose Garden exchange with Obama)
It allows him to deliver his message to his target audience, uncluttered by awkward questions. He speaks smoothly and finishes very rapidly, leaving assertive reporters few chances to ask a question before he reaches the refuge of the Oval Office door.
Sometimes, the president does answer shouted questions. At the end of a March 23 Rose garden event, for example, he answered a shouted question about Trayvon Martin, a Florida youth killed in February.
On Friday The Daily Caller asked a question as his speech appeared to be ending.
The president rebuked the TheDC, but then he declined to answer any other questions when he finished his carefully crafted statement.
He declined to answer TheDCs shouted question about the impact of his new policy on American workers. He also failed to answer another reporters question.
In previous administrations, some reporters used the tactic very effectively. ABCs Sam Donaldson, for example, was famous for his shouted questions to President George H.W. Bush.
TheDCs shouted question was described as a heckle by some established outlets.
Obamas deputy, Janet Napolitano, the secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, followed the same strategy Friday during a morning telephone press-conference. She gave a short statement and then left the conference while two officials provided not-for-attribution answers to selected reporters questions.
The reporters selected to offer questions included established media outlets and Spanish-language outlets. The chosen outlets included the Los Angeles Times, CNN, National Journal, Univision, The New York Times and La Prensa.
The selected reporters did not ask about the controversial impact on American workers.
During the Rose Garden event, Obama depicted the immigrants as Americans except for their legal status.
This pitch blurred the political distinction between Americans and foreigners, and helps him portray the illegal immigrants as deserving of American citizenship.
American citizenship is a highly valued status, because it provides Americans with legal protections worldwide and gives them access to the shared wealth and sympathy of other Americans. Millions of illegal immigrants have risked their lives to win the prize for themselves and their children.
Obama has been under increased pressure from Hispanic lobbies to provide access to citizenship for up to 10 million illegal immigrants, whose arrival will boost the clout of ethnic lobbies.
In general, Democratic politicians have favored easy immigration, despite the impact it has on American workers, who provided the partys base up until the 1980s.
Dictators don’t answer questions, they make decrees.
This announcement WILL NOT boost BHO2’s poll numbers. If anything, it will drive them down.
The more I think about this the more I think unions are going to turn on obama. There are many unskilled labor union memebers that don’t need the extra competition for jobs. I don’t think the won thought this through very well. Shaping up for a blowout election.
What a wimp.
If you read between the lines of what Obama said, he was telling the illegals to go out and register as many dead people as they can and vote as many times as they can in November, so he can make this "temporary" edict permanent.
I think he's decided that he doesn't care and will do all the damage he can before the end (see tag line; I've been saying this since January). This guy is already a dangerous lame duck.
He gets away with this shit because Congress (ie: US) lets him
Dictators don’t answer questions, they make decrees.
“If you read between the lines of what Obama said, he was telling the illegals to go out and register as many dead people as they can and vote as many times as they can in November”
You nailed it. Mexicans and dead people are two of the very few voting blocs in which Obamugabe’s is not in free fall in the polls. He’s just pandering to what’s left of his base.
He rules by ukase but acts like a girlyman. Weird.
He's just reading what Soros types into the TelePrompTer ®.
He never knows what he's going to get.
I can’t see how a union member could view this as a good thing. They already loath Mexicans taking union jobs as it is.
Maybe unions will go for the (R) candidate like they did for Reagan.
Romney must run a Reaganesque patriotic rebuild American campaign.
Not only are they likely to ban Munro, they (the libs that run the WH correspondents association) are talking about banning any correspondent for the Daily Caller. Obama ignores questions from conservatives anyway so there would not be much difference but it shows to any fair-minded person what a dictator he is and his lap-dog members of the press wag their collective tails in agreement.
We can vote in November. However, no matter which side wins with what margin, Obama’s move already de-legitimized the result.
Because it will be challenged and tied up in court. And this time it will be much worse than in 2000. I see dark clouds gathering, one side is eager to have an all out civil unrest.
Oh! I think that is a very good assumtion, a good guess, on what will happen shortly.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.