Skip to comments.Mannheimer’s Manifest for Critique of Islam
Posted on 06/16/2012 11:06:03 AM PDT by bayouranger
Even though the press has silenced critique of Islam at best, and at worst made it sound laughable, the existence of an ever strengthening scene that is critical of Islam in Germany and the rest of the (still) free world can, through the insane actions of Breivik, no longer be denied.
Breiviks mass murder delivered the media (whom, as a result, I subsume together with the Islam-supporting political parties, parts of the Church and the so-called intelligentsia under the term political establishment) not necessarily an important reason to deal with the islamization of Europe currently taking place (to which Breivik referred), but rather the starting point for a broadly applied concerted campaign of denunciation against critique of Islam in general, and in particular against individual persons in the Islam-critical arena.
The objective of this campaign is to attack those of prominence in the Islam-critical movement personally, to discredit them politically and morally by portraying them as crackpots with a crude worldview of Islam, a worldview that culminates in adherence to the conspiracy theory of an alleged islamization, and one that is promoted by the political establishment.
The political establishment, headed up in the media by Stern, Süddeutsche Zeitung, Spiegel, FAZ and also by TV channels ARD, ZDF and Co. and imitated by nearly all daily newspapers who swim along in their wake, pursues with this targeted campaign of denunciation the intent of choking out the Islam-critical movement by criminalizing and villifying any criticism of Islam.
The political establishment, in doing this, is already in the process of fulfilling one of the essential characteristics of the Sharia: in every islamic country, criticism against Islam and its monstrous prophet Mohammed has been forbidden under the threat of the strictest punishments (scourgings, stonings, hangings, denaturalizations, admission to psychiatric wards, etc.) since the beginnings of Islam. And how Muslim functionaries attempt to criminalize critique of Islam as being racism and additionally to implant Sharia in Germany as well as in all remaining non-islamic countries where there is already a notable number of Muslims, and even lately in the UN itself.
Free speech and the right to criticize, however, are the highest values of a free society and elementary components of the UN Human Rights Declaration and the constitutions of the free world. Anyone who claims the right to criticize Christianity or Judaism cannot at the same time call for a prohibition against criticism for Islam.
Because for a long time already, nothing different has been going on: In their critique of the West, western belief systems (Christianity, Judaism, dominant culture discussion), in their general condemnation of the US and Israel, the political establishment is nearly unscrupulous and without taboo. At the same time, they are incapable of naming Islam to some degree as the cause for worldwide terrorism (with over 18,000 acts of terror and over 1 million victims in the meantime since 9/11).
Also, the political establishment is neither willing nor in the position to deal decidedly and in a scientifically critical fashion with Islam and its prophet Mohammed. It would then inexorably come to the same conclusions as Islam critics of all times: namely, that the issue of Islam is less that of a religion than it is of a pseudoreligious totalitarianism that imparts to its followers in over 2,000 (two thousand) passages in the Koran and the Hadiths (the traditions handed down from Mohammeds statements and acts) the license to battle, kill, and even exterminate all of the infidels.
This call has led to the longest lasting war in human history: the now more than 1400-year unending Jihad against the infidels of this world. In the 1400 years of this most bloody and most monstrously followed expansion, this murderous religion has killed more people than perhaps all of the wars in world history together (including the 55 million victims of WWII and the more than 150 million victims of communism). In India alone, more than 80 million Hindus have been slain by Islam, and Buddhism has been nearly eradicated.
The political establishment, however, is deathly silent about these facts. Moreover: they continue to propagate the fable of peaceful Islam (which has never existed and still doesnt exist). And for these subjects they ever cite Cordoba-Islam as historical evidence.
During that reign of the Moors, which spread over broad areas of Spain and Portugal, it is alleged that happiness, tolerance and cultural heyday abounded. The fact that this fable is supported by significant modern Church representatives like Küng barring any substance of truth this sheds light on that which I call the collective failure of European intelligence with regard to Islam. Because such false reports about the true conditions under islamic government lead(/have led) to a totally warped public perception of this religion that has more to do with a blood cult than with a religion in the classical sense.
The political establishment, for example, does not report of the hundreds of thousands of murdered Christians and Jews, of forced islamizations en masse, of a mercilessly harsh dhimmi tax over which many non-Muslims despaired and either left Spain for good or converted to Islam because they economically had no other choice.
They report just as little about the minarets made of skulls on Spanish land: built from the heads of murdered Christians and Jews. Furthermore, they dont report the fact that the moorish Muslims nailed whole village communities to the cross (as is still happening today in Sudan) because the inhabitants either could no longer pay the taxes or a Muslim felt like he had been insulted by an infidel.
They suppress the fact that infidels had to cross the street during the peaceful Cordoba-Islam because a Muslim encountered them, and that they had to turn their face downward if they didnt wish to be beheaded (if the Muslim desired). And they suppress the fact that it wasnt the Nazis, but the Muslims who where the first to come up with the Jewish star: the Muslims forced Spains Jews to identify themselves by the sowing on of a conspicuous piece of material as such.
Islam is the only great religion that rewards the murder of non-Muslims as the highest dedication that a religion has to offer: For the one who murders apostates (renegades) or non-Muslims in a jihad, martyr status beckons, entry into Paradise and eternal bliss at the side of 72 virgins who are at the disposal of the murderer day and night.
As touching the islamization of Europe, the media also dispute this fact. Whereas in 1945 all of 600,000 Muslims lived in Europe (most of them in the southern European countries formerly conquered by Islam), today already more than 50 million Muslims live in the countries of our continent. Each year around 1 million (there are presumably far more) more Muslims immigrate to Europe. 90 percent of the total immigration to Europe since 1990 is Muslim. Muslims have become a danger in every European city: They form parallel societies (which in reality are counter-societies with the objective of forming strategic enclaves for the final battle in the islamization of Europe).
In hundreds of European cities no-go areas now exist: zones in which a native European hardly dare to go, sometimes not even police or firemen do so without additional protection. In northern Europe, a historically unmatched swell of rapes that is silenced as much as possible by the media has reigned for years: Never before in its history were there so many (mass-) rapes registered in the countries of Sweden, Denmark and Norway as in the last decades, and they are even on the increase in proportion with the increase of islamic immigrants to this day. In the capital city of Oslo alone, virtually 100 percent of all rapes in the year 2009 were committed by Muslim immigrants.
The rape of infidels has been practiced since the beginning of Islam and is prescribed as a right for Muslims in the Koran and the Hadiths. Mohammed himself gave the wives of infidels as booty to his warriors after their men were either murdered or shipped off to slavery. Imams preach rape-jihad in every islamic country, and have also done so in every Western country: according to its teaching, women who do not cover themselves according to Islamic regulations are allowed to be raped, since they have displayed their attractions for such a purpose (We have countless examples for this).
Dismissing the fact of the islamization currently happening in Europe as a conspiracy theory, is in itself the real conspiracy theory. It is comparable with criticism against the National Socialist racial insanity of that time: the conforming press of the Nazis dismissed that criticism as anti-German conspiracy theory. However, the critics of that time, as we today know without a doubt, were right.
We critics of Islam, though (still) living in a democratic country of law, find ourselves in the same situation as the contemporary critics of Hitlers time. We are demonized by the political establishment, criminalized and placed mercilessly on the media pyre. They show distorted, monstrous photos of us, which cause some to believe we are neo-Nazis or child molesters. They do everything they can to hammer away at any credibility we have and to write us off as lost and confused à la Breivik.
We, in fact, are presently experiencing the Third Inquisition in our history. Whereas in the ecclesiastical Inquisition no church dogma could be rattled under any circumstances (without running the risk of being burned alive (Giordano Bruno, for example)), in National Socialism and later in the SED dictatorship the misanthropic constitutions of National Socialism and Communism were not allowed to be shaken.
Today, we find ourselves in the midst of the Third Inquisition, which can also be called the Dictatorship of Political Correctness. Under the cover of an alleged fight against discrimination of minorities, of political or religious convictions or of individual sexual characteristics, a current global movement (limited to Western countries) has formed that actually defines criticism of its own system as politically correct, but justified critique of foreign cultures and systems (like Islam, for example) is defined as politically not correct.
Nearly all Western media have subjected themselves to this politically correct, left-wing self-censorship of reason. The one who hits up against the principle of political correctness is stigmatized as a neo-racist, islamophobe, right-wing and the like, and must fear for his professional existence if hes, say, a publicist or professor at a university.
Political correctness is a powerful weapon of ever-present spying of thought and attitudes à la GDR-Stasi and Soviet NKVD developed by the leftists (in the US). In principle, it is the Western playbook for political thought control by the former USSR and Maos China, a control to which millions of people have fallen prey. Political correctness is modern-day, left-wing terror of opinion and attitude. The methods of political correctness are stigmatization of undesirable thoughts and critical people, and they are dependent on the time-honored methods of totalitarian regimes. The results of political correctness can lead to the lifetime loss of a free and secure life, as the cases of Sarrazin and Wilders demonstrate.
The political establishment is, in any case, not just the executor but also at the same time the victim of its own political correctness. Just as political correctness works from inside out, it also works from outside in. No journalist and no press medium can allow themselves these days to question critically what is behind Islam and bring the truth to light without themselves becoming victims of political correctness. We personally know some journalists and politicians who see Islam and the islamization of Europe like we do but who also have justified fear of being mobbed out of office. Be reminded here of the former Hessian minister president Roland Koch, who pointed out in a speech that the crime rate of Muslim immigrants was exorbitantly higher than that of the indigenous Germans. The politically correct establishment thereupon criminalized Koch in as to call him an enemy of multi-culti, xenophobic, etc., so much so, that Koch ultimately had to turn his back on politics.
We critics of Islam are mostly scientifically educated academians. We are neither racist, nor right-wing, nor extremist. Many of us come from the left-wing milieu and have turned away from this in light of the Leftists failure. We come from the heart of society, though of late and pejoratively discriminated against as the New Right by the media. We have among us people of all colors, all races and all religious confessions: there are atheists, agnostics, Christians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists, and even Muslims, who all work for the informing of the dangers of Islam.
We have a thousand times better knowledge about the subject of Islam than the majority of our critics, most of whom have read the the least bit of the Koran and as good as nothing from the Hadiths. Many of us, as former Muslims or because we had lived in islamic countries, have personal experiences about real Islam and therefore know incomparably more about this religion of hate and the extermination of infidels than the majority of our critics.
At the same time, we are disparaged as hate preachers by them, even though we write only about the hate that Muslims are taught through the Koran and Hadiths. We are only the messengers of bad news, but in spite of that, we are vicariously executed (by the media) for the bad news like in old China.
We provide information about:
* the massive discrimination against women in Islams religion of sex-apartheid
* the islamically required honor murderssexual mutilations of young girls and women
* stonings, amputations of hands and other corporal punishments that Islam then as now continues to practice and bases its actions on its holy writings
* the commission for the extermination of all infidels as requirement for eternal peace to come upon the earth
* the brutal oppressions of free people by Islam
* the prohibition from leaving Islam (which calls for the death penalty!)
* the prohibition from criticizing Islam (which calls for the death penalty!)
* Mohammed, who had his critics murdered
* Mohammed, who had sex with little children (this, due to Mohammeds function as an example, is also still explicitly allowed today by Islam)
* the tricks by the Muslims to deceive their enemies and to ambush them (Taqiyya)
* the principle of abrogation of the peaceful Meccan Suras by the unpeaceful-murderous Medinan Suras (of which most journalists still have heard nothing and like Prantl Süddeutsche Zeitung, for example, propagate the nonsense that Islam is nonetheless a peaceful religion by citing the verse No compulsion rules in faith
* the unconditional claim to world power by Islam, which clearly shows it to be a totalitarian system next to National Socialism and Communism
Regarding the above-mentioned points, we critics of Islam give information with valid, indisputable facts. If our facts were false, as our critics suggest of us, we would long since have been overtaken by a Muslim flood of accusations an would have collectively sat in jail because of sedition.
We point out that our critics, so far, have not made substantial statements in one single point regarding our critique of Islam, not to mention being able to refute our criticism. For lack of better arguments, they rather snatch up the time-honored tactic of personal denunciation. We ask our critics whether they, in the 30s and the beginning of the 40s, would have likewise comprehensively denounced the critics of National Socialist race theory as Nazi haters. I personally believe they would have.
I charge the political establishment with no less than a collective failure in light of the great historical threat against Europe. I charge them with the fact that, with their appeasement and their fatal tolerance toward the through and through anti-tolerant system of Islam, they have learned nothing from history and, in their engagement for Islam, have showed themselves to be the worst enemies of a free Europe, ironically believing themselves to be its saviors. Furthermore, I charge them with the fact that they are acting now as though they were already in the service of Islam.
Being cognizant of this danger, I at the beginning of April this year started my call for an universal resistance against the Establishment. This call is not targeted, as is wrongly portrayed, against our country. Rather, it is targeted at the rescue of our fundamental order of peace and democracy (a concept that in itself is used among the Left as a synonym for evil). It is targeted at the rescue of our Constitution, the best that Germany has ever had in its history. And a in typical German matter it appeals to a constitutional, documentary confirmation of the basic right of resistance as reproduced in Article 20, Section 4 of our Constitution for the case in which powers would work toward the dismantling of our Constitution. My call also mentions the right to take up measures of violence as a last resort (and not, as is falsely portrayed by my enemies, as a first resort). Only thus can Section 4 (of Article 20 of the Constitution) be understood, where it verbally says:
Against anyone who undertakes to eliminate this ordinance, all Germans have the right of resistance if another remedy is not possible.
Because a resistance, thus, for the rescue of the fundamental order of freedom cannot reasonably find its limitation by the Fathers of the Constitution if for the execution of the constitutional demand of resistance against the enemies of that fundamental ordinance violent measures< ?em> would be necessary because other measures were fruitless. Should the Fathers of the Constitution, therefore, have ruled out violence in the carrying out of the demand for preservation of the basic order of freedom, then they could have done so clearly and concisely with the addition of peaceful resistance. However, it was clear to them in 1949 that Hitler in 1933 and afterward would never ever have allowed himself to be deposed from power without violence.
Essential powers in the political establishment have long worked on the dismantling of our Constitution. Numerous court judgments are already bending German law and rendering law according to the guidelines of the Sharia: For example, Muslims who beat their wives and by doing so call upon the Koran (Sura 4:34) either receive no punishment at all or are punished way more mildly than indigenous Germans or non-Muslim immigrants.
The political establishment may persecute some of us critics of Islam or put us behind bars. They, however, will not succeed in overcoming the German and European will for freedom that is everywhere and beginning to stir more strongly. Europe can and, moreover, is allowed to let itself not be islamized and that not without resistance. The human will for freedom is indomitable. That is what I stand for. And all freedom loving people in Europe and elsewhere stand for the same thing.
Germany, May 2012
Germany is aware of the problem ....
Europe will rid itself of Islam long before America ever realizes the threat it poses to the country’s very survival.
But then again, government may have every intention to islamize this nation.
How do we go about supporting our European brothers in their struggle against islam (and hopefully victory and ouster of the mohammedans) when they don’t bother to reproduce in any meaningful numbers? The muslims breed like rats because of the subservient role of women and the massive welfare support of the socialist hosts. Now that Europe is going to economically implode, the muslims will riot and probably erupt prematurely. Hopefully whatever Europeans left that have a backbone force the issue and begin massive concentration camps to eventually deport this human waste back to the lands of their origin. The Camp of The Saints in reverse? We can only pray, support and start systems to rid ourselves of the same scourge on our shores.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.