Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Canada edges closer to legalising assisted suicide
BioEdge ^ | 6/16/12 | Michael Cook

Posted on 06/16/2012 2:07:32 PM PDT by wagglebee

The issue of euthanasia in Canada is no longer simmering on a back burner. After the Supreme Court of British Columbia found yesterday that Criminal Code provisions which prohibit doctors from helping their patients commit suicide are unconstitutional, it is on a full, rolling boil. In the landmark decision, Justice Lynn Smith set down that if suicide is legal, preventing handicapped persons from taking their lives must be discriminatory. 

Judge Smith gave Canada's Parliament a year to draft a law permitting assisted suicide. In the meantime she granted the principal plaintiff in the case, Gloria Taylor, an exemption. This makes Ms Taylor's doctor the only person in the country who may now legally help someone commit suicide. The conditions set down by the judge are very similar to those across the border in the US states of Washington and Oregon for physician-assisted suicide. 

Ms Taylor, who has amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS, or Lou Gehrig's disease) released a statement which read:  “I am deeply grateful to have the comfort of knowing that I’ll have a choice at the end of my life. This is a blessing for me, and other seriously and incurably ill individuals. This decision allows me to approach my death in the same way I have tried to live my life – with dignity, independence and grace.”

The controversial case was initiated by Ms Taylor, four other individuals and the BC Civil Liberties Association. They sought to have the court overturn a 1993 judgement by the  Supreme Court of Canada. Sue Rodriguez, who also suffered from ALS, applied for help in committing suicide. The court denied her request but she subsequently committed suicide with the help of an anonymous physician a few months later. 

The judge's 395-page decision, which discusses many aspects of the contentious assisted suicide debate, is sure to be challenged. Basically, her argument can be summed up in one sentence: the plaintiffs "succeed because the provisions unjustifiably infringe the equality rights of Gloria Taylor and the rights to life, liberty and security of the person of Gloria Taylor, Lee Carter and Hollis Johnson [the other plaintiffs]." The case is certain to be appealed to the Supreme Court in Ottawa. 

In addition to the legal arguments from Canadian law, the document raises a number of interesting ethical issues. 

* Suicide, which was removed from Canada's criminal code in 1972, now appears to be regarded as a right. "The claim that the legislation infringes Ms Taylor’s equality rights begins with the fact that the law does not prohibit suicide," the judge wrote. Other people of sound mind can commit suicide if they want, so why not the physically handicapped?  "In my opinion, the law creates a distinction that is discriminatory.  It perpetuates and worsens a disadvantage experienced by persons with disabilities.  The dignity of choice should be afforded to Canadians equally, but the law as it stands does not do so with respect to this ultimately personal and fundamental choice."

* The judge acknowledges that there is no national consensus on assisted suicide. However, in her view, more important than a consensus is the existence of prestigious doctors and ethicists who do believe that it is ethical. "The Canadian physicians who deposed that they would provide assistance with hastened death if it were legal to do so were unchallenged with respect to their standing in the medical community or their understanding of and respect for medical ethics.  Their evidence shows that the view that a physician can never ethically participate in terminating life is not universally held by reputable, experienced physicians, despite the position taken by the Canadian Medical Association and similar bodies."

* The judge accepted the idea that assisted suicide can be successfully regulated. "There is a strong consensus that if physician-assisted dying were ever to be ethical, it would be only be with respect to those patients, where clearly consistent with the patient’s wishes and best interests, and in order to relieve suffering."

Opponents of assisted suicide may highlight Justice Smith's decision to admit as evidence two documents which missed the deadline for submitting evidence. The first is a report from the Royal Society of Canada which strongly backed the legalisation of assisted suicide and euthanasia. It was published last November. The second is a March report from a parliamentary committee in Quebec which recommended the legalisation of euthanasia with strict safeguards. 

TOPICS: Canada; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: assistedsuicide; euthanasia; moralabsolutes; prolife
Just wait until this supposed "right" becomes a duty.
1 posted on 06/16/2012 2:07:44 PM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cgk; Coleus;; narses; Salvation; 8mmMauser
Pro-Life Ping
2 posted on 06/16/2012 2:09:09 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 185JHP; 230FMJ; AKA Elena; APatientMan; Albion Wilde; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

3 posted on 06/16/2012 2:10:13 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

What a sad, sorry place Canada is.

4 posted on 06/16/2012 2:21:43 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
"What a sad, sorry place Canada is."

So true.  It's leading up to the time when half of Canada will break away and apply to become States in the US.

When that will be depends entirely on whether or not US citizens are so stupid it takes them more than eight years to turn this country around. If it takes more than eight years then violence will probably be a major part of the turn around that reigns in the Federal Government and restores the States to the role the Constitution intended for them.


5 posted on 06/16/2012 2:30:39 PM PDT by Rashputin (Only Newt can defeat both the Fascist democrats and the Vichy GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

This is perverted and frightening.

6 posted on 06/16/2012 2:40:53 PM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Poor Canada, and poor us, who will soon be in the same boat.

7 posted on 06/16/2012 3:07:16 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Assisted suicide is already legal in three states Wa. Mt. and Or. maybe you should check out the sad sorry places on your side of the border before you pop off.

8 posted on 06/16/2012 10:31:50 PM PDT by albertabound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: albertabound

Wa. Mt. and Or. are just the tip of the sad sorry iceberg, here south of the Great White North.

9 posted on 06/17/2012 7:23:16 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson