Skip to comments.
Study: More Teens Smoking Pot Than Cigarettes
Time Magazine ^
| June 11, 2012
| Aylin Zafar
Posted on 06/17/2012 12:46:29 AM PDT by Olog-hai
Seems like teens have gotten the memo that cigarettes are bad for you; however, the same isnt true for marijuana, according to a study by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention.Released late last week, the government study revealed that in a nationwide study of 15,000 high school students, pot is now more popular among teens than cigarettes, CBS reports. Eighteen percent of surveyed students in 2011 reported smoking a cigarette in the past month, while 23% reported smoking marijuana in the last 30 days.
Perhaps thanks to the anti-smoking campaigns in ads and in schools, or to the personal experiences teens may have with family members or relatives with lung cancer, cigarette use has been on the decline over the past few years.
But apparently, the association of marijuana with cancer and other health risks is not as prevalent among teens. I just hear a lot of dangers of cancer and cigarettes and I think thats why a lot of teens look to marijuana, Tianda, a Philadelphia high school junior who wasnt identified by her full name, told CBS Philly.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsfeed.time.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antitobaccoscam; cannabis; drugabuse; scam; teenagers; tobacco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Looks like the liberal media is catching up to something that was reported
2½ years ago.
1
posted on
06/17/2012 12:46:49 AM PDT
by
Olog-hai
To: Olog-hai
Heck, with the taxes on cigarettes these days I wouldn’t be surprised if pot is cheaper.
2
posted on
06/17/2012 12:53:26 AM PDT
by
Nik Naym
(It's not my fault... I have compulsive smartass disorder.)
To: Nik Naym
Goodness gracious, we’ll have to have the nanny state do something about that, won’t we! Raise or lower taxes, criminalize or decriminalize substances, spend taxpayer dollars on public awareness campaigns in accordance with the latest taxpayer-funded studies, reverse those campaigns with new taxpayer-funded efforts when tomorrow’s taxpayer-funded studies show the reverse to be true, or just about anything else that will get Jimmy, Mary, and Shaqueesa Fed to GS14!
3
posted on
06/17/2012 1:04:27 AM PDT
by
golux
To: Olog-hai; Revolting cat!
That’s one way to stick it to Bloomberg and the taxnazis.
4
posted on
06/17/2012 1:15:40 AM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(The media ignored the 40th anniversary of Bill Ayers' Pentagon bombing but not Watergate. Ask Why.)
To: Olog-hai
More evidence that letting the government define your life for your leads to tragedy.
Every other message on TV is against “big tobacco”. But pot is cool. I am convinced it is because the South is the big grower of tobacco but blue states are where a lot of pot is grown. As Rush says, follow the money.
I also think the reason a lot of CA turned down legalizing pot is they’d rather work in an illegal industry, because once your industry becomes legal and REGULATED in CA, it becomes almost impossible to turn a profit.
5
posted on
06/17/2012 1:16:18 AM PDT
by
I still care
(I miss my friends, bagels, and the NYC skyline - but not the taxes. I love the South.)
To: Olog-hai
Back in the 70’s, I never smoked...cigarettes.
6
posted on
06/17/2012 2:15:57 AM PDT
by
gigster
(Cogito, Ergo, Ronaldus Magnus Conservatus)
To: I still care
I also think the reason a lot of CA turned down legalizing pot is theyd rather work in an illegal industry, because once your industry becomes legal and REGULATED in CA, it becomes almost impossible to turn a profit. Seeing as how cop unions led the charge against legalization, you just might have unwittingly made a point.
7
posted on
06/17/2012 2:31:59 AM PDT
by
Ken H
(Austerity is the irresistible force. Entitlements are the immovable object.)
To: I still care
“Every other message on TV is against big tobacco. But pot is cool.”
____________________________________
One should listen to Savage describe all of the toxic chemicals in pot...one of the most dangerous substances available today.
He should know, as he was a botanist for some time.
8
posted on
06/17/2012 2:51:49 AM PDT
by
AlexW
To: AlexW
Hogwash. Nobody chews anyones face off after partaking in a spliff..
To: goseminoles
“Hogwash. Nobody chews anyones face off after partaking in a spliff..”
_______________________________
God only knows what YOU are talking about, and HE is not talking.
10
posted on
06/17/2012 3:08:34 AM PDT
by
AlexW
To: Ken H
You legalize pot (and other drugs) that means no more seizures to buy new toys, or task forces with overtime.
That just won’t do, sir. /s
11
posted on
06/17/2012 4:37:24 AM PDT
by
Molon Labbie
(Prep. Now. Live Healthy, take your Shooting Iron daily.)
To: Nik Naym
Cheaper and easier to get for teenagers.
12
posted on
06/17/2012 4:41:25 AM PDT
by
Venturer
To: Olog-hai
Even if one takes every reefer madness allegation of the prohibitionists at face value, marijuana prohibition has done far more harm to far more people than marijuana ever could.
William F. Buckley, Jr.
Blessings, Bobo
13
posted on
06/17/2012 5:33:10 AM PDT
by
bobo1
To: Olog-hai
Seems like teens have gotten the memo that cigarettes are bad for you;
Not really.
I am rather astonished at the number of young people I see smoking, considering the anti-smoking venue we have been under for the last 2+ decades.
Many of these young people have been inundated with the 'no smoking' agenda their entire lives, and especially after the Big Tobacco settlement, which was supposed to end smoking eventually [/s].
14
posted on
06/17/2012 5:43:44 AM PDT
by
TomGuy
To: I still care
I also think the reason a lot of CA turned down legalizing pot is theyd rather work in an illegal industry, because once your industry becomes legal and REGULATED in CA, it becomes almost impossible to turn a profit.
I can't speak for every Californian, but, though I am for legalization of pot, I voted against the last legalization measure, primarily because there was a clause in there that gave pot users protected status against things like being fired for being a pot user. That's a serious no-go for me. I think people should be able to smoke it if they want, and employers should be able to tell them to screw off if they do, as well as other businesses being able to refuse service to stoners. Freedom means you can do what you want, but you have to take responsibility for the consequences.
Also, the "legalize it, regulate it, and tax it" crowd are seriously misguided. Pot is way too easily grown. If the state tried to regulate and tax the heck out of it, people would simply continue to operate underground. It's cheaper and less hassle. Either legalize it or don't. Excessive regulation and taxation is just another form of criminalization.
15
posted on
06/17/2012 6:04:26 AM PDT
by
fr_freak
To: fr_freak
Also, the "legalize it, regulate it, and tax it" crowd are seriously misguided. How so? CA collects around $100M in taxes off of $1B in sales from its medical marijuana program. People are allowed to grow their own, yet they are willing to pay $300 per oz and up for it.
16
posted on
06/17/2012 7:18:47 AM PDT
by
Ken H
(Austerity is the irresistible force. Entitlements are the immovable object.)
To: Olog-hai
Purely anecdotal but I think regular Pot use over years may figure in in myriad cancers around the body.
17
posted on
06/17/2012 7:26:17 AM PDT
by
TalBlack
( Evil doesn't have a day job.)
To: Venturer
It’s why they are fat and stupid,yet the msm blamed everything else like McDonalds,large drinks and want to outlaw it or tax it.
Some times I wonder if the law makers are stoned on the job?.
18
posted on
06/17/2012 8:23:27 AM PDT
by
Vaduz
To: Olog-hai
Doood! Where’s the Republic?
19
posted on
06/17/2012 9:50:22 PM PDT
by
OldEarlGray
(The POTUS is FUBAR until the White Hut is sanitized with American Tea)
To: Ken H
How so? CA collects around $100M in taxes off of $1B in sales from its medical marijuana program. People are allowed to grow their own, yet they are willing to pay $300 per oz and up for it.
OK, CA is getting some money from the deal, but I'm willing to bet that the real amount of marijuana business and consumption in CA is at least 10 times that number. The ones who go to the dispensaries and pay the higher price are probably just the ones who can't grow it themselves and don't know anyone who does. Growing marijuana is still technically illegal, so their is a barrier to your average person growing it in the garden. If weed is fully legalized, but strictly regulated and taxed, you'll still have a black market, but now everybody will know somebody who is growing some in their backyard.
20
posted on
06/17/2012 10:16:12 PM PDT
by
fr_freak
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson