Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

With Surface Tablet, Microsoft Stands Alone
Mashable ^ | June 19, 2012 | Lance Ulanoff

Posted on 06/19/2012 8:02:28 PM PDT by SmokingJoe

With its new Surface Tablet, Microsoft didn’t just break the mold. It smashed it into a million little pieces, chucked them all into the furnace and set the temperature to obliterate. There really is no precedent for what Microsoft did this week. What was once recognizable is gone. The expected is no more. There are no rules, only supply and the possibility of demand.

Microsoft finally built the tablet it wants to use for its platform: an ultra-thin, superlight, kick-stand-sporting, brainiac-cover wearing, touch screen wonder that elicited dozens of “I wants” in Mashable’s live blog chatter.

Surface is still wrapped in so much mystery (no pricing, no availability, no processor speed) that it remains something of an enigma. On the other hand, the tablet (which, depending on how you look at it, may be a full-blown tablet or a hybrid tablet PC) is no reference design. This is not the pad Microsoft wants its partners to build.

The partners are, at least in this instance, out of the picture.

This Is the Windows 8 Tablet

Lenovo, Acer, Asus, Dell, HP, Toshiba and others will surely deliver dozens of Windows 8-based devices this year. Many will sport Intel CPUs. Some, like Asus and Lenovo, are planning tablets and convertibles. These may or may not be well-received. This is no longer Microsoft’s problem.

Or is it?

What, for example, does Microsoft say about Windows tablet design now? Can it point to anything but its own Surface tablet as the epitome of Windows 8 design? Not likely. And what about that very smart cover with the built-in touch or tactile keyboard (take your pick)? Microsoft won’t license that design to its partners. So it’s inevitable that Windows RT partners will always have second best covers.

(Excerpt) Read more at mashable.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: ipad; microsoft; microsoftsurface; microsofttablet; surface; surfacetablet; tablet; windows8
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-147 next last
To: null and void
Hyperbole much?

Especially when they go on to say how the thing is all "wrapped in secrecy" and that no one knows anything about it.

21 posted on 06/19/2012 8:49:29 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe; All

22 posted on 06/19/2012 8:50:14 PM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc1019
I am just so darn tired of Microsoft’s penchant for giving us an incomplete and virus susceptible OS.
I would move on to Apple computers

Windows 7 is at the very least as secure as any Apple desktop OS, if not more secure.

23 posted on 06/19/2012 8:50:26 PM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: musicman
Yeah, gimme Lie-nooks any day!


24 posted on 06/19/2012 8:53:52 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: doc1019
Hacking contest organiser claims Windows 7 more secure than Mac OS X

http://www.electricpig.co.uk/2010/02/19/hacking-contest-organiser-claims-windows-7-more-secure-than-mac-os-x/

25 posted on 06/19/2012 8:54:14 PM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

? Not sure what you are trying to say ... I’m using windows 7.


26 posted on 06/19/2012 8:56:05 PM PDT by doc1019 (Voting for the better of two evils is still voting for evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: musicman
Hacking contest organiser claims Windows 7 more secure than Mac OS X

http://www.electricpig.co.uk/2010/02/19/hacking-contest-organiser-claims-windows-7-more-secure-than-mac-os-x/

27 posted on 06/19/2012 8:57:29 PM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: doc1019

“Gee, another Microsoft device that will need security upgrades every two days, not to mention the OS will be outdated every year requiring a total upgrade ... another Microsoft money sinkhole.”

Microsoft, still chrome plating their turd OS. PC’s are still like Slinky’s, they aren’t really much good, but it’s fun to kick them down a flight of stairs.


28 posted on 06/19/2012 8:58:06 PM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: doc1019
This is the second time you've mentioned yearly upgrades of Windows versions.

How can you upgrade every year to a new version of windows?
XP was released in 2001, Vista in 2006, and Windows 7 in 2009.
Are you installing beta versions?
29 posted on 06/19/2012 8:58:59 PM PDT by FreedomOfExpression
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!
Mac Virus Infects Over Half A Million Computers

http://thebottomline.as.ucsb.edu/2012/04/mac-virus-infects-over-half-a-million-computers

Widespread Virus Proves Macs Are No Longer Safe From Hackers

http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/04/06/widespread-computer-virus-indicates-mac-users-no-longer-safe/

30 posted on 06/19/2012 8:59:34 PM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: doc1019

“With all the resources of Microsoft, you would expect better.”

They are just like Democrats, aren’t they! All horn, no driveshaft!


31 posted on 06/19/2012 9:01:47 PM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: FreedomOfExpression
How can you upgrade every year to a new version of windows?
XP was released in 2001, Vista in 2006, and Windows 7 in 2009.
Are you installing beta versions?

He is an obvious Applebot troll. Called him out on that from the get-go.

32 posted on 06/19/2012 9:01:47 PM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe
Surface is still wrapped in so much mystery (no pricing, no availability, no processor speed) that it remains something of an enigma.

The MS Superficial may be available late Fall 2012 and the Pro in early 2013. When Apple has a major announcement, they say "And it's available starting today.". MS needs to learn this trick.

33 posted on 06/19/2012 9:01:55 PM PDT by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

Then why do I have to download security fixes once a month or better.


34 posted on 06/19/2012 9:02:24 PM PDT by doc1019 (Voting for the better of two evils is still voting for evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: doc1019

Instead of paying, let’s say $99 for each yearly upgrade of Windows (you must be running release #17 by now!) you could switch to a Mac for that price. Just a friendly suggestion.


35 posted on 06/19/2012 9:05:18 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Cementjungle
Especially when they go on to say how the thing is all “wrapped in secrecy” and that no one knows anything about it.

You don't need to know what chip is inside a product, or how much RAM it has, before you can have a hands on evaluation(which they did) of how it works. For example, do you know what processor is running your HDTV set?

36 posted on 06/19/2012 9:05:57 PM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: FreedomOfExpression

So I exaggerated a little, just seems like I get use to a version of windows and along comes yet another. I have windows 7 and all I hear about is window 8. Crap, get window 7 cleaned up and secure before you force me to go to window 8.

Force you say, yes, force. If I don’t move on to the next version of windows I will lose any support for the previous version with a short period of time.


37 posted on 06/19/2012 9:10:58 PM PDT by doc1019 (Voting for the better of two evils is still voting for evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: doc1019
Then why do I have to download security fixes once a month or better.

You also claimed that you did “yearly upgrades to the next version of windows”, when in fact Windows XP was released in 2001, Vista in 2006, and Windows 7 in 2009.
So you were in fact lying and trolling to push an obvious agenda.

38 posted on 06/19/2012 9:11:53 PM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: vette6387

AMEN!


39 posted on 06/19/2012 9:11:58 PM PDT by doc1019 (Voting for the better of two evils is still voting for evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: roadcat
” When Apple has a major announcement, they say “And it's available starting today.”. “

Who uses Apple other than teachers? Just a few other left wing wackos.
Real Americans use Windows or versions of DOS.

40 posted on 06/19/2012 9:18:06 PM PDT by HereInTheHeartland ("The writing is on the wall - Unions are screwed. reformist2 10:04 PM #27"\)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-147 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson