Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rep. Issa ‘disappointed,’ says contempt vote against Holder will move forward
The Hill ^ | 6/19/12 | Jordy Yager

Posted on 06/20/2012 2:58:24 AM PDT by Libloather

Rep. Issa ‘disappointed,’ says contempt vote against Holder will move forward
By Jordy Yager - 06/19/12 05:55 PM ET

A House panel is expected to vote Wednesday to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress after a last-ditch effort to reach a deal over documents related to Operation Fast and Furious appeared to fail.

After a Tuesday evening meeting with Holder and other lawmakers in the Capitol, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) said he was “disappointed” that the attorney general had not come with the documents demanded by the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

Issa, Holder’s chief interlocutor in a saga that has lasted more than a year, said unless Holder provides the paperwork, the contempt vote would proceed Wednesday morning.

Issa also called on President Obama to press Holder “to be more cooperative.”

Holder emerged from the meeting considerably later, and accused Issa of being consumed with “political gamesmanship.”

Holder said he offered to make documents Issa has requested available to the chairman on the condition that the powerful Republican drop the two outstanding subpoenas he has issued to the department. The documents Issa wants are related to the panel’s 16-month investigation of the failed Fast and Furious gun-tracking operation.

Holder said Issa rejected that offer and demanded that Holder fork over the documents to his committee, while offering no assurances that he would drop the contempt vote scheduled for 10 a.m. on Wednesday or consider the subpoenas satisfied.

“I think the ball’s in their court,” said Holder. “They rejected what I thought was an extraordinary offer on our part.

“What we asked from the chairman was an indication that if we provided these materials, that would be considered to resolve the subpoenas that were standing,” Holder said. “He’s not indicated the desire to do that at this point. I hope he will change his mind.”

Asked whether he had spoken to any of the House Republican leaders about ways to resolve the matter, the attorney general declined to comment.

“I don’t want to answer that question,” he said.

Issa said he hoped Holder would deliver the documents later Tuesday night, but that until he received them he would plan to move forward with the contempt vote.

“If we receive no documents, we’ll go forward,” said Issa. “If we receive documents, we’ll evaluate them and we’ll take such time as is necessary in delay to be sure of the quality of these documents and whether they’re sufficient.

“We never expected to get all of the documents. But our hope was, and still is, that later this evening we’ll receive such documents that’ll allow us to say that at least for the time being we’re evaluating future documents.”

Rep. Elijah Cummings (Md.), the ranking Democrat on Issa’s committee, and Sens. Patrick Leahy (Vt.) and Chuck Grassley (Iowa), the top Democrat and Republican, respectively, on the Senate Judiciary Committee, also attended the meeting

Cummings said he believed Issa’s mind was made up about the contempt vote before the meeting.

“It appears that the chairman made up his mind even before we stepped into the room,” he said following the meeting, which lasted roughly 30 minutes.

Grassley, however, praised Issa for moving forward with the contempt vote and called Holder’s offer unacceptable.

“The attorney general wants to trade a briefing and the promise of delivering some small, unspecified set of documents tomorrow for a free pass today,” said Grassley in a statement after the meeting. “That’s unacceptable. I’m not going to buy a pig in a poke.”

Issa wants documents that he says would show how much Justice knows about Fast and Furious. Holder has insisted he did not know of the gun-tracking operation, and he has noted that a similar operation was executed under the Bush administration.

Issa has focused his request on DOJ documents from after Feb. 4, 2011, when the department sent a letter to Grassley denying that it lets guns “walk” across the border into Mexico. Issa wants as much internal correspondence as possible that could give him a clear picture of how much the department knew about those tactics and what made the DOJ withdraw that letter in December.

Fast and Furious was an attempt by the Justice Department's Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) to track the flow of weapons from the United States into Mexico in hopes of dismantling drug cartels’ network.

Nearly 2,000 guns were sold in the United States to straw buyers for the cartels, but instead of tracking the weapons, ATF agents were ordered to let them go with the hope of rediscovering them later at a crime scene or drug bust.

The Department of Justice's inspector general, at the request of Holder, has been investigating Fast and Furious for more than a year and is searching for who is responsible for the controversial tactics. Issa has been conducting his own investigation.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2deadfeds; 300deadmexicans; atf; banglist; contempt; dea; dhs; doj; fastandfurious; fbi; gunrunner; gunwalker; holder; ice; issa; murdergate; obama; vote
Time to prosecute.
1 posted on 06/20/2012 2:58:37 AM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Axelrod, Obama, Holder are thinking -—”How do we spin this as racist? And which of our media stooges will help us do it?”


2 posted on 06/20/2012 3:06:53 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather; TigersEye

Holders intent was to support the propaganda meme that guns used in Mexico were being purchased in the USA.

This fact was disproved by independent work of the National rifle Association, and it was established cl;early for all to see that “Fast and Furious” were a means to impose increased federal gun control on Red States like Arizona.In Obamas opinion, too many Americans cling bitterly to their bibles and guns.Obama has acted to remove the bible from civil society, and has acted to diminish 2nd amendment rights by refusing to enforce US laws and creating false
information based on his own policy conduct, designed to axchieve an idological end.

This is treasonous conduct. Both Holder and Obama need to go.


3 posted on 06/20/2012 3:07:46 AM PDT by Candor7 (Obama fascist info....http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
"”How do we spin this as racist? And which of our media stooges will help us do it?”"

Too late.

Chrissy Tingle-leg already played the race card last night on Hardhead.

4 posted on 06/20/2012 3:14:36 AM PDT by SnuffaBolshevik (In a tornado, even turkeys can fly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

“Issa also called on President Obama to press Holder “to be more cooperative.””

That’s some nice finger-pointing, Issa. Don’t stop there!


5 posted on 06/20/2012 3:34:19 AM PDT by equaviator (Where there's soot there was smoke.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I think “they” are hoping and praying for a prosecution event before the election. It seems that they’re goading Issa, et al., into going forward with it. It’ll distract from the economy/jobs. It’ll distract from Obama’s legitimacy. And it’ll make the GOP look like petty idiots as in the Clinton impeachment. Even though gun walking and the death of an American is stunningly more important than perjury and a blue dress with love ick on it, the MSM knows how to spin a story. Contempt hearings will be a dream come true for them.


6 posted on 06/20/2012 3:35:46 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Mathews started last night with a comment some thing like who is this man(issa) to stop and frisk some one in this position(holder)
I other words who are you to question the Attny G of the US could it be because he is a negro. Mathews is one sick sob
7 posted on 06/20/2012 3:38:22 AM PDT by CGASMIA68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Libloather; Red_Devil 232
Enough talk. Take the vote. Hold the criminal sonuvabitch in contempt. And per a post by esteemed fellow FReeper 'Red_Devil 232', this is what is SUPPOSED to happen after the entire House votes:

"Following a contempt citation, the person cited is arrested by the Sergeant-at-Arms for the House or Senate, brought to the floor of the chamber, held to answer charges by the presiding officer, and then subjected to punishment as the chamber may dictate (usually imprisonment for punishment reasons, imprisonment for coercive effect, or release from the contempt citation).
Imprisonment is usually for days like 10 or so."


Of course if the presiding officer is Speaker of the House John Boehner, the 'punishment' will probably be to join Boehner and the President on the Andrews AFB golf course for 18 holes.

(sit down Bill Clinton, those '18 holes' have nothing to do with female anatomy, ok?)
8 posted on 06/20/2012 3:39:57 AM PDT by mkjessup (Jimmy Carter is the Skidmark in the panties of American history, 0bama is the yellow stain in front!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Holder is trying to hide something really big, maybe a trail to the White House.


9 posted on 06/20/2012 3:45:55 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

It’s a “physician, heal thyself” moment (Holder, prosecute yourself). High tragecomedy.


10 posted on 06/20/2012 3:48:55 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Let me ABOs run loose Lou!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: Libloather

Does a contempt of Congress vote have any consequences or is it more a vote of no confidence?


12 posted on 06/20/2012 3:54:14 AM PDT by saganite (What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam
That's exactly right. They want a side show to distract from the economy.
13 posted on 06/20/2012 4:02:04 AM PDT by MCF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

“Holder is trying to hide something pretty big”
I’m pretty sure he has had plenty of time to destroy any incriminating evidence against the One and himself AND Hillary, who I suspect was behind this all the time. I remember her tirades back then about American guns being bought by drug cartels. All crocked as a barrel of fishhooks. It’s going to embariss Issa and Boner when there is NO incriminating evidence to be found. I hope I am wrong and they all go to prison for high crimes and misdemeanors!


14 posted on 06/20/2012 4:14:00 AM PDT by SWEETSUNNYSOUTH (Liberalism is a mental disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: saganite
Interesting read, Pg. 43 here: Contempt of Congress Penalties
15 posted on 06/20/2012 4:14:56 AM PDT by PowderMonkey (WILL WORK FOR AMMO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
According to the wikipedia entry, there are apparently three outcomes possible from a being found guilty of Contempt of Congress (only two of them from the House)

INHERENT CONTEMPT

Under this process, the procedure for holding a person in contempt involves only the chamber concerned. Following a contempt citation, the person cited is arrested by the Sergeant-at-Arms for the House or Senate, brought to the floor of the chamber, held to answer charges by the presiding officer, and then subjected to punishment as the chamber may dictate (usually imprisonment for punishment reasons, imprisonment for coercive effect, or release from the contempt citation).

Concerned with the time-consuming nature of a contempt proceeding and the inability to extend punishment further than the session of the Congress concerned (under Supreme Court rulings), Congress created a statutory process in 1857. While Congress retains its “inherent contempt” authority and may exercise it at any time, this inherent contempt process was last used by the Senate in 1934, in a Senate investigation of airlines and the U.S. Postmaster.

STATUTORY PROCEEDINGS

“This article contains weasel words: vague phrasing that often accompanies biased or unverifiable information. Such statements should be clarified or removed. (July 2008)”

Following a contempt citation, the presiding officer of the chamber is instructed to refer the matter to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia;[9] according to the law it is the “duty” of the U.S. Attorney to refer the matter to a grand jury for action.

The criminal offense of “contempt of Congress” sets the penalty at not less than one month nor more than twelve months in jail and a fine of not less than $100 nor more than $1,000.[10]

While the law pronounces the duty of the U.S. Attorney is to impanel a grand jury for its action on the matter, some proponents of the unitary executive theory believe that the Congress cannot properly compel the U.S. Attorney to take this action against the Executive Branch, asserting that the U.S. Attorney is a member of the Executive Branch who ultimately reports only to the President and that compelling the Attorney amounts to compelling the President himself. They believe that to allow Congress to force the President to take action against a subordinate following his directives would be a violation of the separation of powers and infringe on the power of the Executive branch. The legal basis for this belief, they contend, can be found in Federalist 49, in which James Madison wrote ““The several departments being perfectly co-ordinate by the terms of their common commission, none of them, it is evident, can pretend to an exclusive or superior right of settling the boundaries between their respective powers.” This approach to government is commonly known as “departmentalism” or “coordinate construction”[citation needed]

CIVIL PROCEDURES

Senate Rules authorize the Senate to direct the Senate Legal Counsel to file a civil action against any private individual found in contempt.

Upon motion by the Senate, the federal district court issues another order for a person to comply with Senate process. If the subject then refuses to comply with the Court's order, the person may be cited for contempt of court and may incur sanctions imposed by the Court. The process has been used at least six times; but the civil procedure can only be used against Executive branch officials “in certain limited circumstances.”[citation needed]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contempt_of_Congress


Do we really think Holder will send Holder before the Grand Jury?

16 posted on 06/20/2012 4:16:23 AM PDT by garyb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam

Contempt hearings will be a dream come true for them...

I’d take that challenge in a second and turn it into a nightmare.
This is big time criminal activity by folks that really do believe that it is not, because somehow they are empowered to ignore established criminal law...

We could tack them to the wall - nothing about F&F is even remotely legal & the stonewalling screams cover up.


17 posted on 06/20/2012 4:21:42 AM PDT by bill1952 (Choice is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
”How do we spin this as racist? And which of our media stooges will help us do it?”

Yes, who will be the one chosen to say, "If Holder were white, would Issa and the Republicans be attacking him?"

18 posted on 06/20/2012 4:22:30 AM PDT by Right Wing Assault (Dick Obama is more inexperienced now than he was before he was elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I read that the man who will ultimately handle the prosecution of Holder (if the House moves it forward) actually WORKS for Holder.

Not to mention that the penalty is something like a $1000 fine...

Personally this just looks like politics to me. The Republican House should be doing other things.


19 posted on 06/20/2012 4:35:59 AM PDT by libdestroyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
The criminal offense of "contempt of Congress" sets the penalty at not less than one month nor more than twelve months in jail and a fine of not less than $100 nor more than $1,000

Can someone tell me why we're wasting this time and energy for this?
20 posted on 06/20/2012 4:38:31 AM PDT by libdestroyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PowderMonkey

Thanks. So Congress does have the power to punish but under these circumstances I don’t believe anything beyond the contempt vote will happen.


21 posted on 06/20/2012 4:41:22 AM PDT by saganite (What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Libloather; marktwain; Joe Brower; MestaMachine

22 posted on 06/20/2012 4:41:22 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee; Joe Brower; LucyT; vette6387; MetaThought; 60Gunner; XHogPilot; FreedomPoster; ...

Waiting and watching ping.


23 posted on 06/20/2012 4:51:06 AM PDT by MestaMachine (obama kills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: saganite
Yep. In an nutshell, Congress certifies the contempt charges, and refers it to the Office of the Attorney General for prosecution. Oops. In this case that won't work. So, it gets referred to the Office of the President. I believe the plan is to ultimately, one way or another, toss it into Obama’s lap, and force him either shove Holder under the bus, or slit his own throat by declining prosecution.
24 posted on 06/20/2012 4:53:33 AM PDT by PowderMonkey (WILL WORK FOR AMMO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

This is Obama’s treason. Everyone else is a useful idiot.


25 posted on 06/20/2012 4:56:33 AM PDT by politicianslie (Obama: Our first Muslim PRESIDENT,destroying America $1 Trillion at a time! And America sleeps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Libloather; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; Gilbo_3; NFHale; Impy; ...
RE :”Time to prosecute.

I am sure that when the House (Issa) refers charges on Holder to the Holder attorney general office he will act swiftly on prosecuting himself, OK back to the planet Earth. Living in a fantasy world is not beating Dems

The Dem talking points have gone out and are being repeated over and over, I heard them on MSNBC and then Dems flooded all the CSPAN lines this morning including the Republican ones, the points go : “Bush started that program (F+F) and Holder stopped it as soon as he learned about it. Issa promised from day 1 to bring the Obama administration down and this is nothing more than a witch hunt. “ .

It may be a lie but Republicans appear not to be organized like Dems are to counter it.

26 posted on 06/20/2012 4:58:59 AM PDT by sickoflibs (Romney is a liberal. Just watch him closely try to screw us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

Maybe a trail to the White House?

How could there be any doubt in your mind?


27 posted on 06/20/2012 5:00:56 AM PDT by politicianslie (Obama: Our first Muslim PRESIDENT,destroying America $1 Trillion at a time! And America sleeps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER
The trail is already at the Oval Office door.

Denis McDonough, "Obama’s most influential foreign policy adviser" and the Fast & Furious Cover-up.

28 posted on 06/20/2012 5:09:32 AM PDT by MissMagnolia (Being powerful is like being a lady. If you have to tell people you are, you aren't. (M.Thatcher))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

My money is on Boner running away from conflict, clearly showing his yellow streak.


29 posted on 06/20/2012 5:11:37 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

OK, contempt charges may be filed.....then what?

We saw the Republicans impeach Clinton and everyone saw how badly that was taken by Clinton and the rest of the population since nothing ever really happened to actually remove him from office.

Now, like little mad lemmings, the Republicans are going to file contempt charges against Holder. Then what? Nothing!

We’ve seen it before and we will see it again...no followup.


30 posted on 06/20/2012 5:12:08 AM PDT by DH (Once the tainted finger of government touches anything the rot begins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam
Contempt hearings will be a dream come true for them.

That dream doesn't work when nobody's working. Clinton's stains didn't sink him because he was riding the wave of the Republican Congress's tax cuts.

Contempt hearings for one or more of Zippy's thugs will provide a lot of footage of Holder ducking and slithering, and occasional mention of a lot of murders in Mexico caused by him. It will tarnish an administration people already distrust. Some won't go to the polls; by November, others will actually vote GOP.

31 posted on 06/20/2012 5:21:01 AM PDT by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Fast and Furious was an attempt by the Justice Department's Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) to track the flow of weapons from the United States into Mexico in hopes of dismantling drug cartels’ network.

It was nothing of the sort. It was an attempt to justify increased federal control on the right to bear arms by the citizens. The media still persists in telling this lie. All know it is untrue. But if you tell the big lie often enough..... AP = Always Propaganda

32 posted on 06/20/2012 5:33:54 AM PDT by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
you're spot on about boner ... the entire process is just so much Kabuki theater ... there are no substantive penalties for contempt of congress and prosecution of contempt falls to Holder's own DOJ

the time for reason is long over and there are several people in the ground

boner and company have been complicit

remember Charlie Rangel and just look at Mad Maxine

Ethics Case Against Congresswoman to Resume

6/6/12 WASHINGTON — Leaders of the House Ethics Committee said Wednesday that they would move ahead with a long-delayed inquiry into allegations of impropriety by Representative Maxine Waters after concluding that committee missteps had not denied Ms. Waters a fair hearing in the case.

Ethics investigators accuse her of improperly trying to facilitate federal bailout financing and do special favors for a Boston-based bank, OneUnited, at a time when her husband had stock in the company worth about $200,000.

Maxine Waters Ethics Case: 6 Committee Members Recuse Themselves Los Angeles Times ^ | Richard Simon - Friday, February 17, 2012 3:05:05 PM

33 posted on 06/20/2012 5:39:02 AM PDT by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

And expose the cover up,expect another Obama EO.


34 posted on 06/20/2012 5:50:33 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

RINO racing snails leap to the starting gate!!!

ONLY one quarter mile to go!!!

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.


35 posted on 06/20/2012 5:52:03 AM PDT by Flintlock (THE TRUTH: It's the new hate speech..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

“Axelrod, Obama, Holder are thinking -—”How do we spin this as racist? And which of our media stooges will help us do it?””

To answer that question, it is all the media stooges. However, due to the gay pride fiasco which had black leaders panties all wadded up, they will probably do the church circuit again to make sure any congregants that were looking to escape the plantation are brought back.


36 posted on 06/20/2012 6:11:27 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (ABO 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

Holder gets executive privilege for requested documents!


37 posted on 06/20/2012 7:01:20 AM PDT by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
The Dem talking points have gone out and are being repeated over and over, I heard them on MSNBC and then Dems flooded all the CSPAN lines this morning including the Republican ones..

I remember when CSPAN had one call-in line. They switched when too many conservatives were calling in - decided to give 'equal time'. If a thousand conservatives were trying to call and 10 liberals were calling - they would get 'equal opportunity' to speak. So, they took 10 calls from each group - meaning 100% of the liberals got to speak - vs one percent of conservatives.

To add insult to injury - liberal decided that wasn't enough advantage and came up with ways to cheat a system rigged in their favor. They call in and lie - say they're moderates or conservatives - and of course CSPAN is too stupid to catch it.

If conservatives started doing the same, CSPAN would catch it and correct it in days - maybe hours.

Of course, the 'doting court eunuchs' of the MSM fail to notice... when it works for their side. Shame on CSPAN.

38 posted on 06/20/2012 7:04:46 AM PDT by GOPJ (The 'doting court eunuchs' of the MSM fail to notice...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Red_Devil 232

Fact or conjecture?


39 posted on 06/20/2012 7:05:56 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: MrB

At 10:00 am Obama declared executive privilege over Justice dept document.
Guilty as charged.


40 posted on 06/20/2012 7:12:49 AM PDT by wiggen (The teacher card. When the racism card just won't work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: wiggen

Outright impeachable.

Congress better step up, this has just raised the stakes considerably.

It also shows that the documents would implicate 0bama as well.


41 posted on 06/20/2012 7:18:49 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Independent Counsel time.


42 posted on 06/20/2012 7:33:41 AM PDT by Principled (It's not enthusiasm for Romney, it's grim determination to remove Hussein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

” My money is on Boner running away from conflict, clearly showing his yellow streak.”

I agree. I think he already tried to run away a few months ago.


43 posted on 06/20/2012 8:59:09 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

No, the NRA had to be dragged kicking and screaming to look at the evidence. The story was broken by citizen-journalists Mike Vanderboegh (http://sipseystreetirregulars.blogspot.com) and David Codrea at examiner.com. They finally got Sen. Grassley interested and then CBS and Fox News took up the story. The NRA took forever to get aboard and then, typically, tried to hog all the credit for it.


44 posted on 06/20/2012 1:16:44 PM PDT by dcwusmc (A FREE People have no sovereign save Almighty GOD!!! III OK We are EVERYWHERE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks sickoflibs.


45 posted on 06/20/2012 2:52:59 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
I remember when CSPAN had one call-in line. They switched when too many conservatives were calling in - decided to give 'equal time'. If a thousand conservatives were trying to call and 10 liberals were calling - they would get 'equal opportunity' to speak. So, they took 10 calls from each group - meaning 100% of the liberals got to speak - vs one percent of conservatives.

Like Benny Hill's RABBIT STEW.

"You have rabbit stew"?

"Yes.".

"I heard it had horse meat in it."

"Yes."

"How much?"

"Fifty percent."

"Fifty percent?"

"Yes. One horse, one rabbit."

46 posted on 06/20/2012 3:30:10 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

Like Benny Hill’s RABBIT STEW.

“You have rabbit stew”?

“Yes.”.

“I heard it had horse meat in it.”

“Yes.”

“How much?”

“Fifty percent.”

“Fifty percent?”

“Yes. One horse, one rabbit.”

******************************************************’’

LOL - made my day. Have you seen Black Books with Dylan Moran? Not quite Benny Hill or Monty Python but funny - very funny...


47 posted on 06/20/2012 6:21:14 PM PDT by GOPJ (The 'doting court eunuchs' of the MSM fail to notice...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

“Black Books” is hilarious. “The IT Crowd” is very good also.


48 posted on 06/20/2012 6:30:37 PM PDT by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: kevao
“The IT Crowd” is very good also.

Thanks, I'll try it.

49 posted on 06/21/2012 7:22:07 PM PDT by GOPJ (The 'doting court eunuchs' of the MSM fail to notice...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson