Obama’s Despotism Takes Switchblade to U.S. Constitution

Examiner ^ | June 20, 2012 | Kevin Fobbs

[Kfobbs]

The rule of law that safeguards all Americans is what our brave men and women have fought and even died on the field of battle for, and in one swift switchblade move, President Obama has decided that he will decide nearly a million illegal criminals will not have to abide by federal and state laws. Obama also practiced this same despotic action when he decided in February 2011to not enforce the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) which congress passed in 1996, that barred the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriage. But the despotic Obamarule did not stop there, because there is more. Last August, 2011, the Obama administration also decided to violate federal law again, by not enforcing deportation rules against non-citizen “spouses” of gay U.S. citizens. There is a very vile and very sinister pattern and practice afoot here as practiced by this administration that cares far more about the rules of Saul Alinsky’s socialist-minded theocracy than the rule of American U.S. Constitutional democracy. Examine several of the rules yourself and you be the judge. Socialist Saul Alinsky postulated that “The morality of means depends upon whether the means is being employed at a time of imminent defeat or ...

[Brent in TN]

WHY AREN’T THE REPUBLICANS IN THE HOUSE AND SENATE SCREAMING AND YELLING ABOUT THIS????

[DuncanWaring]

Because that would be racist.

[Liberty Valance]

[Tzimisce]

I guess you can try to impeach him.

It’ll go down 98-0 in the Senate, but you can try I guess.

[Conservative Vermont Vet]

Yeah, but Mittens is just as bad...if not 10 TIMES WORST...right, all you Hate-Romney-Mormons, DELUSIONAL TWITS, who stand on your so called "Principles???

Of course, push come to shove, there is not ONE of these Freeps who can provide even ONE instance whereby Mitt has done or said ANYTHING to even begin to come close to what our FASCIT, NEO-COMMIE, has for the past 3 years.

BUT, please, prove me wrong if any of you can!!!

[itsahoot]

WHY AREN’T THE REPUBLICANS IN THE HOUSE AND SENATE SCREAMING AND YELLING ABOUT THIS????

Have you considered that maybe they don't disagree with it?

Why is Communism no longer considered traitorous to the Constitution?

Why is Agenda 21 moving forward?

Why is there silence on the LOST treaty?

Why are our Borders still open? It is not about cheap labor.

Why does the GOP always compromise when the DEMs almost never do?

Why does this President have unlimited power of War?

Why is there no budget?

[OldNavyVet]

From “The Road to Serfdom” by F. A. Hayek.

“Nothing distinguishes more clearly conditions in a free country from those in a country under arbitrary government than the observance in the former of the great principles known as the Rule of Law. Stripped of all its technicalities, this means that government in all its actions is bound by rules fixed and announced before hand – rules which make it possible to foresee with fair certainty how the authority will use its coercive powers in given circumstances and to plan one’s individual affairs on the basis of this knowledge.”

[mongo141]

Because we need to replace about 90% of them with names drawn at random from large phone books throughout the country disqualifying such scum as lawyers, drug dealers, etc.etc. We would probably get a better gov than we have now.

[MortMan]

Romneycare.

You miss the point entirely. The issue is the leftward drive (I once would have said “drift”) of the R party. Instead of listening to a significant portion of their base, they ram a liberal-lite R emissary down our throat.

When do we get to stand behind our conservative principles, instead of loitering down the street?

[AuH2ORepublican]

“Obama’s Despotism Takes Switchblade to U.S. Constitution”

---

Switchblade? Oh, my. The headline writer is sure to be accused of racism. I mean, if Obama supporters accused *Bill Clinton* of racism when he said in 2008 that voters shouldn’t “roll the dice” with the unproven Obama instead of the experienced Hillary—under the theory that Clinton was evoking the image of a shifty black man rolling dice in a back alley—then a headline writer linking Obama with a (metaphorical) switchblade will be lucky if he isn’t brought up on charges.

[uncommonsense]

"Switchblade? Oh, my. The headline writer is sure to be accused of racism."

A fine point (pun), but can you honestly see the metrosexual ObaMao handling a switchblade (unless it's a toy used to fix cleat marks on the putting green)?