Oh my, how right you are!
Absolutely agree with your comments on Hannity. He does the same thing on his radio show, which for the most part, I no longer listen to, nor watch the t.v. show for the same reason you articulated. He’s constantly talking over people and not giving them a chance to finish their statements, especially when it’s an opposing point of view. I like to at least be able to listen to someone’s opposing point of view, not that I would agree with it, but at least like to hear it. But Hannity is constantly interrupting others, and it had become so annoying for me that I just don’t listen to him anymore.
Hannity, B’OR, they just can’t help themselves.
It is so annoying the way they constantly interrupt with their boring, stupid comments. Michelle M. usually gets the short end of the stick when she is sandwiched between Juan and “Don’t let your heart be troubled” man.
She’s sufficiently PO’ed now though and has asserted herself much more lately. Love, love, love her. She’s speaking at our Freedom Conference in Co. this August. YAY!
I have the same problem with O’Reilly. Just when one of his guests gets rolling he leaps in with his opinion, which is usually a non- opinion. His “ we’re not going to try this case here” routine gets very old. I say bravo, Michelle. Holder never knew what hit her.
I turned-off that liberal-RINO blowhard Hannity years ago; he’s dogcrap and 10x worse than nails on a blackboard.
+1
Like I have always said,”The Sean Hannity show would be much better if Sean Hannity was not on it”.
Hannity can not handle these two women, last week should have been embarrassing enough.
His questions are usually as long and pointless as Obama's answers.
I've noticed the same thing about Charlie Rose. Many's the time I've found myself shouting at the television, "SHUT UP, CHARLIE, DAMMIT!!" (or even worse, when he gets really annoying and tries to bullsteer his guest's responses in the direction Rose wants to take him).