Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court says union must give notice to nonmembers before collecting dues increase
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ ^

Posted on 06/21/2012 7:28:32 AM PDT by jakerobins

The Supreme Court says a union must give nonmembers an immediate chance to object to unexpected fee increases that all workers are required to pay in closed-shop situations.

The court on Thursday ruled for Dianne Knox and other nonmembers of the Service Employees International Union’s Local 1000, who wanted to object and opt out of a $12 million special assessment the union required from its California public sector members. Knox and others said the union did not give them a legally required notice that the increase was coming.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: scotus; seiu; sourcetitlenoturl; uniondues; unions; unionthungs
More Union slapdowns...Scott Walker effect
1 posted on 06/21/2012 7:28:36 AM PDT by jakerobins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jakerobins

How much will this cost Team Obama


2 posted on 06/21/2012 7:34:18 AM PDT by scooby321 (h tones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jakerobins

ouch , people getting tired of unions using them as a piggy back


3 posted on 06/21/2012 7:34:18 AM PDT by molson209
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jakerobins

7-2 slapdown too! Of course it was the 9th circus that got overturned again.


4 posted on 06/21/2012 7:34:37 AM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jakerobins

Its good but too many people are attributing everything to Scott Walker that have been in the works for a while. We’ve made major moves in Michigan over the past couple of years with virtually no notice outside the state.


5 posted on 06/21/2012 7:36:54 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jakerobins; big'ol_freeper; Lil'freeper; TrueKnightGalahad; blackie; Cincinatus' Wife; ...

CNN ducking this anti-union decision as expected, only reporting on FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc. ‘indecency’ case ruling in favor of the TV Networks.


6 posted on 06/21/2012 7:37:02 AM PDT by Bender2 ("I've got a twisted sense of humor, and everything amuses me." RAH Beyond this Horizon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

Chicken Scotus won’t rule today on Obama Care


7 posted on 06/21/2012 7:37:23 AM PDT by scooby321 (h tones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jakerobins; Lurking Libertarian; JDW11235; Clairity; TheOldLady; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; ...
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.

8 posted on 06/21/2012 7:46:29 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jakerobins

Well, looks like $12 Million less for Jerry Brown’s efforts to drive more business and business people out of the state in an effort to keep his union boss buddies happy.

For those that may have not been following Governor Moonbeam’s latest attempts to complete the conversion of Caliph-phony-a into Zimbabwe-lite, there are now two measures on the November ballot, one to increase our sales tax, one to increase state income taxes. Don’t know the exact details, don’t NEED to know them to know I will vote “NO”, “HELL NO”, or “WTF are you smokin’ Moonbeam?”

Of course, if we vote down these bills, there will be a massive budget shortfall here and they will have to cut teachers, policemen, firemen, and all the other shlubs on the firing lines. Nothing, of course, about the fact that there are probably more do-nothing management types in these areas that could be fired on the spot with nobody ever noticing.


9 posted on 06/21/2012 7:46:29 AM PDT by ssaftler (Nixon 1973: "I am NOT a crook!" Obama 2012: " I am NOT a schnook!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
...with virtually no notice outside the state...

Romney is beating Obama in the polls
You've slapped the caregivers union (SEIU) back
You've turned a deep blue state into reddish-purple

We've noticed.

10 posted on 06/21/2012 7:47:30 AM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jakerobins
Does anyone know the last time an opinion of the Ninth Circuit was heard by the U.S. Supreme Court and NOT overturned?

I hope Congress reorganizes the Circuits in early 2013 and splits the current Ninth into pieces, and creates new circuits that require all the judges in the Ninth Circuit to move or to retire.

11 posted on 06/21/2012 7:55:05 AM PDT by MIchaelTArchangel (Da Bro' Gotsta Go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jakerobins

Sad commentary that the highest court in the land must occupy its time with common sense and/or simple contract law enforcement.

Also a sad commentary on the political power of union thugs.


12 posted on 06/21/2012 7:58:10 AM PDT by relictele
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scooby321
Chicken Scotus won’t rule today on Obama Care

This ruling has such a major impact, I don't think the USSC will publish their ruling until the last day.

And I don't think it's a "Chicken Scotus". The ruling is likely a very lengthy document that will need careful editing prior to its being released. There is a reason that the rulings are released over several days during the two-week period; that reason is that every one of their documents must have appropriate language and go through multiple markups in the majority opinion and the minority dissenting opinions as well. These edits take a lot of time. The Court is merely getting those that are easier to go through this process out of the way first.

13 posted on 06/21/2012 8:04:38 AM PDT by Real Cynic No More (OxBAMA!!'s name is all caps as sarcasm to indicate a lack of respect, as he does not deserve it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

“7-2 slapdown too!”


It was 7-2 on the result, but Alito’s opinion of the court only had 5 votes (the four conservatives plus Kennedy). Alito’s opinion requires that unions must allow members to opt-in whenever they raise dues or have special assessments.


14 posted on 06/21/2012 8:05:55 AM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jakerobins

...and Gisnberg and Sotomayor vote with the majority on this one. Someone please check the temperature of hell.


15 posted on 06/21/2012 8:07:13 AM PDT by Pharmboy (Democrats lie because they must.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ssaftler

“Of course, if we vote down these bills, there will be a massive budget shortfall here and they will have to cut teachers, policemen, firemen, and all the other shlubs on the firing lines. Nothing, of course, about the fact that there are probably more do-nothing management types in these areas that could be fired on the spot with nobody ever noticing?

Don’t even get me started on all the Caltrans and City employees I see sitting their fat rears on truck bumpers at job sites.


16 posted on 06/21/2012 8:07:45 AM PDT by DAC21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Real Cynic No More

What in the world would the Justices have to fear?


17 posted on 06/21/2012 8:08:10 AM PDT by scram2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jakerobins

Nice to see the Wise Latina isn’t competing with Kagan for title as the most liberal Supreme ever to sit on the bench.


18 posted on 06/21/2012 8:20:55 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kidd

Still voted for O-Romney when the time came that we could have gotten a real conservative.

I remain unconvinced.


19 posted on 06/21/2012 8:30:35 AM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Texas, Texas, Whisky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican

Heh, from what I can see, Alito’s decision grandfathers all present union members in California their present dues rate.

Unless they consent to the raise, they can’t be forced to pay anything more than they do right now.

This ia brutal decision. Means that the higher inflation gets, the worse off the union.


20 posted on 06/21/2012 8:36:24 AM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Texas, Texas, Whisky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: scram2
What in the world would the Justices have to fear?

I don't think they have anything to fear.

Having participated in writing highly technical documents, I have an understanding of the process. There are nine strong-willed individuals here, and to get everyone to agree with the wording; having clerks research and incorporate appropriate past references correctly; etc. I don't think this is anything more than focusing the Court's resources on the easier documents first because these are quicker to resolve.

The Court has been working on these decision documents for some time. If their initial time were spent on the OBAMACARE case, they would drag that out (Parkinson's Law) and other cases wouldn't get ruled on. By taking the easier cases first and continuing to work on the OBAMACARE ruling in the interim, their rate of productivity as measured by the number of cases they decide is higher.

Now if they punt until the next session of the USSC, I will have been proven wrong.

From a purely political perspective, I think delaying til next week is best. If the ruling were today, the news media would focus completely on OBAMACARE and Fast and Furious would receive much less attention. Right now, Fast and Furious is finally in the headlines. And if OBAMACARE comes out next Thursday, and it is an affirmation that it is unconstitutional, there will be another week of publicity negative to the Administration.

Remember that last week the media focused on OBAMA's immigration amnesty; the message was positive for HIM. This week, with Fast and Furious, it's negative. If the USSC rules against, then the message will be negative for him, but also for Democratic congrss-people. After all, the Republicans can say, "See, we were right to vote against it. The Democrats did not allow us to provide input into the bill to make it constitutional."

If the USSC rules in favor, then the U.S. has a real problem, maybe one that we can never recover from.

21 posted on 06/21/2012 8:56:38 AM PDT by Real Cynic No More (OxBAMA!!'s name is all caps as sarcasm to indicate a lack of respect, as he does not deserve it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jakerobins

BTTT!


22 posted on 06/21/2012 4:58:53 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson