Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lies, false accusations hamper fighter jet program (South Korea)
The Korea Times ^ | 06-22-2012 | Lee Tae-hoon

Posted on 06/22/2012 5:31:28 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

Lies, false accusations hamper fighter jet program

By Lee Tae-hoon

The country’s fighter jet procurement project is facing a major stumbling block as groundless rumors and false accusations spread fast enough to convince politicians of both the ruling and opposition parties to believe “something is fishy.”

The upsetting truth is that few pay attention to the rationale behind the need to introduce advanced new jets and what is behind an intensifying negative campaign mounted by anti-American, anti-Lee Myung-bak administration figures and anonymous sources.

As soon as the state-run Defense Acquisition Program Administration (DAPA) announced a plan to reopen the bid to acquire 60 new jets with a budget of 8.3 trillion won ($7.2 billion), rumors circulated that it was a conspiracy to change the rules in favor of U.S. defense giant Lockheed Martin.

The upsetting fact is that in order to observe the law, DAPA had no choice but to delay the project for three weeks after finding out Tuesday that two of the three competitors, Lockheed Martin and European Aeronautic Defense and Space Company (EADS), failed to meet document requirements.

DAPA made it clear that it is mandatory for all bidders to submit the Korean version of their proposal during an explanatory session in front of reporters, Air Force officials and industry representatives and stipulated the rule in the its request for proposal (RFP).

However, only Boeing, which won the two previous fighter jet programs, abided by the instruction, while the two others neglected to translate crucial information, such as technology transfer and price.

“In case of a discrepancy between the Korean and English language text, the Korean version shall prevail,” a top DAPA official said Friday.

“We had to request the resubmission of their proposals in order to avoid a possible legal dispute over the interpretation of the text in accordance with the law.”

Another senior official pointed out that his agency notified all three bidders that there will be no revision of the RFP, but malicious rumors spread that Seoul will eliminate requirements to submit information about the cost and the degree of technology transfer.

He noted that media outlets went as far as claiming that Lockheed Martin did not submit any documents about the two crucial pieces of information mandated in the RFP but that is also totally baseless.

“We have no reason to give favors to one party or another whether it is an American company or not,” he said asking for anonymity. “However, an anti-American sentiment and hostile feelings against DAPA head Noh Dae-lae and President Lee Myung-bak appear to have gained momentum to hamper the procurement deal.”

Air Force officials also lament the current situation, saying the government will likely have no choice but defer the project for two to three years for its failure to dispel the spread of false information about the fighter jet program.

“We don’t care who wins the project anymore as all three competing jets meet our requirements,” a senior Air Force Official said. “But it is of utmost important to procure them in time to replace some 240 aging F-4 and F-5 jets that will retire from 2020.”

He warned that the F-4s and F-5s that are often 10 years older than the pilots who fly them will end up becoming administrative staff as the country will begin to lose a battalion-size Air Force unit a year from 2020.

“A large number of pilots will end up becoming office workers if Korea begins to receive new jets after 2020.”

Under the current plan, Seoul will sign a deal by the end of this year and new jets will be delivered here from 2016 through 2020.

Rumors are rampant that President Lee has made a secret deal with the United States to purchase Lockheed Martin’s F-35, the only fifth-generation stealth fighter available in the market, in return for unsolicited favors.

The F-35 program is drawing great criticism for its cost overruns and delays in development, but people here do not bother to pay attention to why the United Stated and eight partner countries have participated in the program.

Experts say the F-35, whose target RCS is believed to be 0.001 square meters, is the only available fighter jet for Korea to have a military balance in the Northeast Asia as China and Japan are developing their own stealth jets.

They also noted it is questionable that EADS’s Eurofighter Typhoon, whose RCS is believed to be at least 10 times higher than the F-35, have pledged to allow Seoul to manufacture its latest jets and provide the most generous pack of technology transfer.

“Japan picked the F-35 over the Eurofighter as the cost of running the Eurofighter exceeds that of the F-35,” a senior military official said. “Europeans are known to be good at boasting what they can offer, but are infamous in keeping pledges.”


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; eurofighter; f35; southkorea

1 posted on 06/22/2012 5:31:38 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

If Korea is in a hurry to replace their F-4s and F-5s, Block 60 F-16s with AESA radar is only a signed check away. Ditto F-15Ks with AESA radar. Korea already flies the F-15K, sans AESA.

So replace the F-4s with more F-15Ks, and replace the F-5s with F-16C block 60s.

Spend the money saved by not buying F-35As on something else.


2 posted on 06/22/2012 7:25:18 AM PDT by Yo-Yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

I think the Koreans aren’t just looking for another fighter. There are looking for some brand new generation fighters with technology transfers. F-15K with AESA isnt a giant leap from the F-15K sans AESA. And they can always get an upgrade if an AESA radar is all they need.


3 posted on 06/22/2012 9:56:57 AM PDT by ravager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson