Skip to comments.EU should 'undermine national homogeneity' says UN migration chief
Posted on 06/22/2012 7:12:50 AM PDT by bayouranger
The EU should "do its best to undermine" the "homogeneity" of its member states, the UN's special representative for migration has said.
Peter Sutherland told peers the future prosperity of many EU states depended on them becoming multicultural.
He also suggested the UK government's immigration policy had no basis in international law.
He was being quizzed by the Lords EU home affairs sub-committee which is investigating global migration.
Mr Sutherland, who is non-executive chairman of Goldman Sachs International and a former chairman of oil giant BP, heads the Global Forum on Migration and Development, which brings together representatives of 160 nations to share policy ideas.
He told the House of Lords committee migration was a "crucial dynamic for economic growth" in some EU nations "however difficult it may be to explain this to the citizens of those states". 'More open'
An ageing or declining native population in countries like Germany or southern EU states was the "key argument and, I hesitate to the use word because people have attacked it, for the development of multicultural states", he added.
"It's impossible to consider that the degree of homogeneity which is implied by the other argument can survive because states have to become more open states, in terms of the people who inhabit them. Just as the United Kingdom has demonstrated." Continue reading the main story Start Quote
At the most basic level individuals should have a freedom of choice
End Quote Peter Sutherland UN special representative for migration
(Excerpt) Read more at bbc.co.uk ...
That's working great in Los Angeles. /s
The parasite nations which control it have their own political and economic agendas, their are totally inimical to American interests, and they undermine our Constitution.
The scary part about this is THEY REALLY BELIEVE THIS.
The Council on Foreign Relations, The Bilderberger Group, G-20 and powerful international corporations ALL want the elimination of national borders and a one-world state.
When you look at the REST of the world and the governments which control it, the ramifications of that should be manifestly clear.
In the US, we have Cloward-Piven: Get everyone on government charity, overwhelm the system, cause the economy to collapse, toss the Constitution aside, then reconstruct the nation along Marxist lines.
In Europe, I think they are basically doing the same thing. The economic crisis is a good thing. They want it bigger. They want it worse. They want it widespread. Then, when everyone is thoroughly desperate, the political union will be seen as the only way out.
A sovereign states policies are a sovereign states policies. They are NOT subject to the One Worlders fantasy and some pipe dream of international law. The Dutch are just beginning to see the light according to reports from Holland.
A lot of these third world immigrants are like cowbirds.
Cowbirds lay their eggs in nests built by other birds. When the cowbird chicks hatch, they are bigger and stronger than the chicks of the birds who built the nests. The Cowbird chicks kick the other chicks out of the nests and/or take all the food from the nest-building parents and force the latter to rear them.
I hope the Europeans wake up before its too late.
Maybe Goldman-Sachs will go under and make it a little easier to overecome the forces of one-worldism.
For example, see "Diversity" In Context: Reality vs. Leftist Fantasy; or World Government--Surrender By Subterfuge.
Note, also, as communities are diversified, they become less cohesive, and less able to resist those who seek to control everyone from a centralized power base. The American Revolution would never have succeeded without the Committees of Correspondence, who represented cohesive local societies.
What an amazing coincidence that all Western nations are following the same failed policies.
You would think that at least one would try something different.
I totally agree with you.
Agenda 21 and that international arms agreement are steps in that direction.
Another overlord sowing multiculturalism so that that they can make everyone a serf.
The most perfect comparison I've seen here on FR! Brood Parasitism/Cuckoo's Egg. I'm going to use it.
Your comparison is also apt because the brooding parent birds are too stupid to realize their own offspring have been displaced and continue to work hard and diligently feed the alien hatchling - just like Westerners.
“EU should ‘undermine national homogeneity’ says UN migration chief”
Bring back Bismarck
Bring back the Romanovs
Bring back Franco
Bring back Archduke Ferdinand
Heck, bring back Mussolini
At least back then, Europeans had a sense of national identity.
This policy enables the migration of Muslim hoards, under the guise of 'refugee status' into the non-Islamic West to proceed at breakneck pace - aka mirroring the hijra (migration) and behavior of their prophet (uswa hasana al insan al kamil - the best example of the perfect man to be mirrored for all time in all places until all worship is for allah).
Consider this recent and very revealing Canadian broadcast report from SUNTV from which I provide the following quotes:
"We recognize the central role of the United Nations in advancing the sustainable development agenda. We are committed to strengthening the role of the United Nations Environment Programme as the leading global environmental authority that sets the global environmental agenda.
2.>@3:17 environmentalist, Tim Flannery:
"The negotiations now ongoing towards the Copenhagen agreement are in effect diplomacy at the most profound global level. They deal with every aspect of our life and will influence every aspect of our life, our economy, our society, our relationship with the developing world, our relationship with the environment as well."
"This document that sees Canada and every country that signs it declaring the United Nations has real power on sustainable development around the world. And as the document makes clear, there is no part of human activity that sustainable development does not touch on." [ff approx. 4:20]
4. @ 3:57
". . .climate policy is redistributing the world's wealth." - Ottmar Edenhofer
Now consider those highlighted phrases above. Do any present a ring of cautious familiarity? Try this . . .
Question 1: What other structured social system is all encompassing & touching on every part of human activity? Answer: Islam
Question 2: Identify another recent example of the wholesale transfer of global wealth (aka redistribution). Answer: As Hugh Fitzgerald at JihadWatch.org often stated. . .
" in Islam, it is hard for Muslims to see the failures of their own societies political, economic, social, intellectual, and moral not least because the vast oil wealth, that is unearned, that comes from an accident of geology, has given the Muslim oil states more than twelve trillion dollars since 1973 alone, which represents the greatest transfer of wealth in human history. And many Muslim states, such as Pakistan, and Afghanistan, and Egypt, and Jordan, and of course the Palestinian Authority, have been receiving money not from oil wells, but aid, endless aid, running into the tens and hundreds of billions of dollars, from Infidel lands. And while the Muslim recipients receive that aid as their due, the non-Muslim donors have come to give that aid uninterruptedly, for fear that if they stop, or cut the aid, the Muslim recipients will get angry. In other words, the aid from Infidels has, on both sides, turned into a kind of Jizyah, a tax that must be paid lest the Muslim masters punish the Infidels who are not obeying the laws that govern dhimmis."Ok, now consider this a dare. Take a close look at your own local community and tally up the number of new mosques/Islamic community centers/Islamic organizations that have popped up since 9/11/2001. Then read about The Kinetic Effects of Prayer in Islam. Absorb those thoughts and then sit back and review a few articles posted at www.refugeeresettlementwatch.worpress.com to come to grips with the abusive strategies of NGO's and religious organizations undertake to enable millions of Muslims to resettle in the non-Muslim West, some as your new neighbors, arriving as 'refugees', often without documentation, fleeing wars, social disturbances, ethnic cleansing etc. of resident non-Muslim communities with the complicity of these Muslim 'refugee' efforts at enabling the encroachment of sharia enforcement in nearly EVERY global conflict as illustrated in this video clip.
This 'redistribution' of Allah's soldiers is no accident either as it reflects their
profit's prophet's [uswa hasana al insan al kamil, the perfect example of man to be emulated for all time until all worship is for allah] and his hijra [aka 'migration from Mecca', a pattern that would be mirrored for all time by Muslim invaders everywhere until all worship is for allah].
End result . . . this UN has become the vehicle of the global transition via "Diplomacy of Global Dhimmitude" retrieving Global "Jizyah" [redistribution of wealth] under the PC guise of 'sustainable environmentalism' as demanded under sharia. Lan astaslem
This would be termed “genocide” if applied to an African or Asian country, in this country if you mentioned that you would like to make blacks a minority in Detroit you would probably be stoned to death.
I’m a couple of lines ahead of you but we’re on the same page.
Feel free to use that and you are absolutely right about the parents being too stupid to realize it and that being analogous to dumb Westerners.
Back in 1965 I was just a kid, but I realized that the immigartion act passed that year would be a disaster.
Our educated and intelligent leaders, on the other hand, couldn’t see this. They were even dumb enough to believe Ted Kennedy, a man who wouldn’t have recognized the truth if it spit in his face, when he said it wouldn’t.
Damn, I hate it when I’m right.
The UN has just told the EU to be more over it trying to displace and replace the indigenous peoples of Europe? !@#!$#@ anti-white bastards are breaking their own conventions. Let them be open with this hatred of whitea dn Europeans and let us leave these pernicious institutions, by which I mean the UN and EUSSR/Eurabia.
Yes, there can be said one good thing about this man: at least he is frank about his goal.
What a pity that this is the only good thing which can be said about him...or about the EUSSR, for that matter ;-)