Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

3 reasons Microsoft's Surface is no joke
Fortune ^ | June 22, 2012 | Don Sears

Posted on 06/23/2012 7:18:05 AM PDT by SmokingJoe

Many have scoffed at the idea that Redmond's tablet will succeed. But there are three crucial reasons to take the effort seriously. By Don Sears

FORTUNE -- Do not underestimate Microsoft's Surface tablet move. Its gambit to design and build its own hardware is a bold play to develop a thriving ecosystem of new products. It is centered on Microsoft's dominant property: the operating system. Monday's flashy Surface launch may have felt like an Apple event with its bright, pastel-colored keyboard, slick introductory videos and breathless hyping from little-known engineers. But, in fact, Microsoft's play is anything but Apple-like. The company is clearly trying to make tablets into hybrid PC-mobile devices, something its California rival has said is a bad idea. We don't yet know all of Surface's details -- battery life, pricing, official release dates are all to-be-determined for instance. But here are three important reasons Microsoft's Surface is likely to be anything but dead on arrival:

Reason #1: Microsoft can build an ecosystem

Microsoft (MSFT) has had success in the consumer market with the Xbox and most recently with the Kinect motion-control devices. The Xbox has become a household name with major brand extensions as an entertainment device. Microsoft disrupted gaming, and it can disrupt hardware.

Microsoft has serious engineering chops. Josh Topolosky, Editor-in-Chief of The Verge and not exactly a fanboy, was blown away by a visit to Microsoft's R&D in 2011. He wrote of that visit: "[MS] showed me a project … which would allow you to create a virtual window from one room to another, utilizing a variety of display, motion sensing, and 3D technologies… dubbed … the 'magic wall.' It was nuts. It was awesome. It was ambitious. The whole time, all I could think was: where has Microsoft been hiding guys like this?"

(Excerpt) Read more at tech.fortune.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: ipad; microsoft; surface; tablets
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-275 next last
To: null and void
They call it "Surface", because it's all surface, there is nothing underneath.

Below the surface, lies Windows 8, which is a lot more powerful OS than anything Apple or Google offer. In fact, I've been using Windows 8 for the last month as the only OS on my computers, and, it's worked flawlessly, and with greater speed, and a few more features. And, believe it or not, what defines a computer, is not the hardware features that come with it, but the software that knows how to make things work flawlessly and smoothly and to expectations.

And, why would anybody denigrate a product which they haven't even seen or touched yet? What's in it for you, except, a dislike for anything Microsoft? It's just hardware and software, and there's no need to get emotional about it.
21 posted on 06/23/2012 8:57:25 AM PDT by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: adorno
I don't suppose you read all three sentences in my most, did you?
22 posted on 06/23/2012 8:59:23 AM PDT by null and void (Day 1250 of our ObamaVacation from reality - Obama is not a Big Brother [he's a Big Sissy...])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: null and void

...post...


23 posted on 06/23/2012 9:02:59 AM PDT by null and void (Day 1250 of our ObamaVacation from reality - Obama is not a Big Brother [he's a Big Sissy...])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: null and void
I don't suppose you read all three sentences in my most, did you?

Sure I did. But, the one that stands out, is the one I quoted, and the one which renders your other sentences superfluous. Your last sentence came across as an attempt to rescue yourself from your second.
24 posted on 06/23/2012 9:07:13 AM PDT by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: adorno

Translation: I hit a nerve.


25 posted on 06/23/2012 9:27:04 AM PDT by null and void (Day 1250 of our ObamaVacation from reality - Obama is not a Big Brother [he's a Big Sissy...])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: frankenMonkey

The Apple philosophy is to limit what devices can do, and Microsoft’s is to expand the things they can do. MS wants to be all things to all people. That’s hard to do.

But Job’s “total control” gave us such wonders as the one-button mouse, the keyboard with no cursor keys, cases you can’t open without special tools, and Big Brother oversite of what “apps” users are allowed to run.

The Surface has a lot of new technology that redefines how a table can be used. The iPad is for content consumers only. The Surface is clearly intended for content consumers and content creators. All things to all people.

I willing to bet in three years the iPad will look a lot more like the Surface than visa versa.


26 posted on 06/23/2012 9:43:26 AM PDT by BigBobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe
Been reading the Microsoft haters on here. Same with all the articles in the other stories I read about the Surface and even Windows phone 8. I'm puzzled by the emotion people are attaching to their devices. If you don't like something, don't use it. But to declare and even wish/hope/fight for the failure of a product or company is just plain stupid...IMHO. I'm surprised that people on here are not cheering for competition....isn't that the conservative values....competition makes everybody better. I've used I-phone, Android and Windows phones. They all have their good points. I am currently using the Windows phone and for me and my needs, it has been the most easy to use and I've never had one glitch. But I don't hate the other companies.

Just my two hundredths of a dollar on the subject.

27 posted on 06/23/2012 9:48:09 AM PDT by Jerry Attrick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe
Been reading the Microsoft haters on here. Same with all the articles in the other stories I read about the Surface and even Windows phone 8. I'm puzzled by the emotion people are attaching to their devices. If you don't like something, don't use it. But to declare and even wish/hope/fight for the failure of a product or company is just plain stupid...IMHO. I'm surprised that people on here are not cheering for competition....isn't that the conservative values....competition makes everybody better. I've used I-phone, Android and Windows phones. They all have their good points. I am currently using the Windows phone and for me and my needs, it has been the most easy to use and I've never had one glitch. But I don't hate the other companies.

Just my two hundredths of a dollar on the subject.

28 posted on 06/23/2012 9:48:20 AM PDT by Jerry Attrick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jerry Attrick

Worth repeating...


29 posted on 06/23/2012 10:00:37 AM PDT by null and void (Day 1250 of our ObamaVacation from reality - Obama is not a Big Brother [he's a Big Sissy...])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

MS has always needed someone with the vision of a Steve Jobs at the helm.

If they could find such a one then even at this late date they could move in a new and exciting direction.

I’d start by creating a new tablet design that ran a custom version of MS Linux. I’d include Win7 as a virtual OS that ran under that custom Linux to handle legacy. I’d have a nice LARGE monitor and wireless keyboard/mouse for the tablet. I’d fix it so just placing the tablet close to the monitor would charge it and connect it up using RF. No cables!


30 posted on 06/23/2012 10:07:39 AM PDT by Bobalu (It is not obama we are fighting, it is the media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: varmintman; SgtHooper

If MS wasn’t around we’d be using LINUX, OS2, WordPerfect, Borland development tools, QuattroPro, Mozilla browsers and any number of similar superior products and all of those products wold be 30 years further down the road than they are now. MicroSoft is in the basic business of locking down 80% market shares with fascist marketing and 3’rd rate software

Bump := Bump +1;

Yep.

Microsoft has always been better at destroying their competition than they were at innovating anything.

 

Azure?  LOL.  I think of it as Micro$oft Virtual Picks and Shovels.   Pass the "Cumpute" Salt.

31 posted on 06/23/2012 10:09:57 AM PDT by OldEarlGray (The POTUS is FUBAR until the White Hut is sanitized with American Tea)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BigBobber
"All things to all people" is what is so frustrating (for me, at least) about Microsoft. It ends up not doing any one particular thing the best it could be done.

If you want content consumption, do a tablet.
If you want content creation, do a computer.
32 posted on 06/23/2012 10:12:03 AM PDT by frankenMonkey (This tagline for rent. Inquire within.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Proud2BeRight

>>ecosystem???????

Think of it as that which grows out of a framework of buzzwords and bullshyte.

 

Got RPC?

 

33 posted on 06/23/2012 10:13:58 AM PDT by OldEarlGray (The POTUS is FUBAR until the White Hut is sanitized with American Tea)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BigBobber

“The Apple philosophy is to limit what devices can do, and Microsoft’s is to expand the things they can do.”

That, and affordability, are the big reasons why MS dominates the market, and Apple fans just can’t process that. Most people want a computer that will do what they want it to do, not what the manufacturer decides that they should want to do.


34 posted on 06/23/2012 10:31:08 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Jerry Attrick

Apple fans love to feel superior; it’s just part of the Apple culture that Jobs encouraged. They get off on looking down on other people who don’t join their cool kids club.


35 posted on 06/23/2012 10:35:35 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

When will they price the Surface?


36 posted on 06/23/2012 10:37:54 AM PDT by Tau Food (Tom Hoefling for President - 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob

“At a comparable price with Apple, I’ll buy the Apple. I know it works.”

Me too! Actually, I’ll continue to buy Apple products. I had my “time with” PC’s. PC’s are like old British cars, you have to have two of them to be certain that one will be working when you need it.


37 posted on 06/23/2012 10:40:22 AM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tau Food

When it goes on sale, duh.


38 posted on 06/23/2012 10:41:03 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

I agree that competion is good. It pushes innovation and cost reductions.


39 posted on 06/23/2012 10:44:44 AM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: OldEarlGray

As near as I can tell, Borland never did anything wrong or made any sort of a bad move. They should be a very major company and would be other than having been steamrolled and dogged at every step and every move they ever made.


40 posted on 06/23/2012 11:05:26 AM PDT by varmintman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-275 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson