Posted on 06/23/2012 9:43:26 AM PDT by kingattax
One of the U.S. Senates leading experts on judicial matters and homeland security tells Newsmax that President Barack Obamas invocation of executive privilege is a clear signal that theres something the administration is trying to hide at the heart of the Fast and Furious gun-running scandal.
Theres fire there. Its not just smoke, and theres no other reason to have that, said Sen. Tom Coburn in an exclusive Newsmax interview. There is legitimate cause to be concerned about the untruthfulness of the attorney general and his lack of forthrightness with oversight committees that are studying this.
Despite the presidents assertion of executive privilege, Coburn believes that the information will ultimately find its way into the public eye.
Its going to eventually be exposed, predicts Coburn, who is a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee and the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. The question is can they put it off until after the election? I suspect thats why the president issued the executive order.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...
Can anyone really be surprised by Obama’s move to silence this affair? After all, why would he spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to sequester his own past unless he had something to hide. Likewise, the DOJ fiasco has his prints all over it, so why would we expect any more clear assistance in helping resolve the Fast and Furious issues. His entire administration has kept things behind closed doors, even though he promised the “most open administration in history”. He cannot be trusted with anything, let alone me or my kids’ future.
Its going to eventually be exposed, predicts Coburn.. The question is can they put it off until after the election? I suspect thats why the president issued the executive order.
What I really wonder is..how MUCH do Coburn, Grassley and Issa know NOW that they're keeping under wraps for the time being??? According to Sipsey Street Irregulars blog http://sipseystreetirregulars.blogspot.com/2012/06/sipsey-street-exclusive-more-doj.html there are now DoJ whistleblowers too. How long can these lies be kept from the public?
Until, say...October?
I"d hope Issa's folks didn't think that was just more Democrat crazy talk.
I"d hope Issa's folks didn't think that was just more Democrat crazy talk.
Could happen. By then the Democrats will be working overtime to discover more last-minute dirt on the Republican candidate as was done for Bush #43.
Not if we keep them on the defensive with this issue while Bush#42.5 (sorry for the downgrade but you were giving Romney way too much credit) tackles Obama on his economic record and other policy failures.
I think the right word is "manufacture" not discover.
I suspect there’s a bit of gamesmanship going on here. It’s entirely likely that the documents the Committee seeks have already been leaked. Much like the announcement of the information contained in the wiretap requests, Issa may be goading Holder (and now Zero) into digging the hole just a little deeper.
Yes.
I am stunned that this fantastically brilliant constitutional lawyer is so bone stupid that he tied himself to F&F with an EO that is illegal and can't hold. The man is a fool.
No..repeat..No operation on the order of Fast and Furious could have been approved at any level lower than the Oval Office. Nobody else has that much authority.
Tied himself to F&F? He dictated F&F in the first place. F&F is Obama’s baby.
ATTENTION: tonight (Saturday) 7pm (pacific) on CSPANII Book TV is an interview with Katie Pavlich/Editor Townhall on her book Fast and Furious: Barack Obamas Bloodiest Scandal and Its Shameless Cover-Up
When are they going to answer the claims of racism and political maneuvering with: “Right is right no matter how many are against it and wrong is wrong no matter how many are for it.” Or: “The law is the law and nobody is above it.” Or: “Gun running is a crime everywhere in the world. It always has been.”
No doubt the plan was to use ‘Wide Receiver” as a cover for “Fast and Furious”.
She interviewed some of the masked gang members and asked where they got all their state of the art guns and he answered "the US government gets them for us."
I remember going "Do what"?
She never even asked a another question about it.
Current is Algores's channel I believe. Ive been trying to go back through the episodes on Netflix to find it. Pretty damning.
This Entire F&F debacle is ridiculous.
While Holder and Co were working so hard to stop the imaginary problem of American semi autos getting into the cartels hands they did NOTHING to stop Chavez from building Two full auto Kalashnikov factory’s in Venezuela.
The entire thing was a rouse to clamp down on our 2nd amendment rights.
Yeah, and he all but admitted it by delivering the protective EO.
One thing that the MSM is not reporting or at least connecting. Jamie Zapata’s parents and patrol partner filed suit within the same twenty-four hours that the EP was issued. Early posted one of Grassley’s letters from a year ago.
It appears that they had quite a bit of information before the Dog oops DoJ whitleblowers came forward. If I were Issa and Grassley, I make a very public plea that anyone even remotely involved could work out a “plea deal” NOW but not after it all comes down.
Here’s the thread TF posted it for me. Don’t know how to get past PDF filss.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2898481/posts
An EO covers the executive branch,it does not apply to the Judicial branch.
In placing the EO Obama ha either used the EO illegally OR admitted that the Executive branch was in cahoots with the judicial branch on F&F.
Either way he has stepped in it bigtime.
WHat time Eastern??
ATTENTION: tonight (Saturday) 7pm (pacific) on CSPANII Book TV is an interview with Katie Pavlich/Editor Townhall on her book Fast and Furious: Barack Obamas Bloodiest Scandal and Its Shameless Cover-Up
Perhaps I missed something but I don’t see where I mentioned Romney and gave him any credit at all, much less “way too much”.
obama is a lackey. He has done, does, and WILL do whatever he is told. That is his job and the price he pays for all the perks he has playing president.
Anyone who thinks he calls the shots is nuts. Anytime he has tried to branch out on his own, he has botched it huge rewuiring ther big dog to come to his rescue.
requiring
It certainly looks that way.
He really looks like a fish out of water with each passing day.
I used to think he was actually smart(but evil)
Now he just looks like a struggling affirmative action appointee that is doing the DNC’s bidding.
Who is telling Obama what to do?
I've been up too long, I guess.
Follow the link at 20 to the letter Grassley wrote a year ago. SInce then other whistle blowers have come forward. . No gamesmanship needed. He’s got the goods.
RE: CSPAN-2 Book TV
I assume 10PM Eastern — I am Pacific time and it is on my TV schedule for 7PM in So. Calif. Better check your listing.
Valerie Jarrett.
It’s not just with the Mexican. If you read the first one hundred posts of the Chicago crime thread, notice the names that begin with “A” and their native country. Most are along the drug routs from Afganistan. There are many who are also involved with banking...Could be money laudering of drug money. Obama has his own form of the UN.....Could we have our first drug-pin pResident?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2151323/posts
Interesting to note, approximately 1 week prior to Omama evoking "Executive privilege" in regards to Mexican gun running documents, he quite suddenly gives a directive, announcing nearly 1 million Mexicans will not face deportation and will be given legal status.
Could there be an unseen correlation or connection between these two events?
Did he make a deal?
Was he or others blackmailed?
The timing of these two events seems rather remarkable.
Who is telling Obama what to do?Good question? I don't doubt there are many dark forces and evil individuals (eg Soros) behind Obama, but as for "calling the shots"...
Who do you think that is, MestaMachine?
No problem — my memory often needs reinforcing and I had to double check the number myself. Enjoy the day.
Who is directing Valerie Jarrett?
Interesting to note, approximately 1 week prior to Omama evoking "Executive privilege" in regards to Mexican gun running documents, he quite suddenly gives a directive, announcing nearly 1 million Mexicans will not face deportation and will be given legal status.
Could there be an unseen correlation or connection between these two events?
Did he make a deal?
Was he or others blackmailed?
The timing of these two events seems rather remarkable.
For example:
_________________________________________________________
Mexicos President Says US Politicians Taking Drug Money from Cartels
The President of Mexico has an unfortunate message for Americans still ignorant of the Drug Wars cold realities: Some of your politicians are involved.
william jefferson clinton...from the jump. clinton is who got obama elected and that deal was made at the kerry convention.
clinton is an evil genious. The whole ‘new’ energy thing began with clinton.
No way is he the first. Too many Arkancides to account for.
Is someone directing Valerie Jarrett?
"...If the House were to approve it, attorneys for the House of Representatives would then ask a federal court to order Holder to turn over the documents he has been withholding.
If Holder were to refuse, the court could then order U.S. Marshals to arrest Eric Holder and incarcerate him until he complies.
There is a detention area in the Capitol complex, although the court would presumably incarcerate Holder in the Prettyman Federal Court House on Pennsylvania Avenue. One can only hope that justice would finally be served."
GOA Newsletter XXXII, Number 2-June 29, 2012
Could there be an unseen correlation or connection between these two events?
__________________________________________________________
Mexicos President Says US Politicians Taking Drug Money from Cartels
The President of Mexico has an unfortunate message for Americans still ignorant of the Drug Wars cold realities:
"Some of your politicians are involved".
DOJ: Sinaloa Cartels Influence Extends Well Beyond Border Into Much of the U.S.
(CNSNews.com) The Sinaloa criminal cartel uses its control of drug corridors on both sides of the Arizona-Mexico border to extend its influence well beyond the border area into much of the United States, according to the Department of Justice.
A member of the cartel, who is facing federal charges in Chicago, claims that he was allowed to traffic tons of drugs into the United States under an immunity deal granted by the U.S. government in exchange for information on rival cartels a deal allegedly linked to the aborted law enforcement operation known as Fast and Furious.
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/doj-sinaloa-cartel-s-influence-extends-well-beyond-border-much-us
As if we weren’t already aware of the bias in liberal media, I’ve found it interesting that when Cindy Sheehan spent the Summer in a ditch outside the Bush ranch in Waco, that was worth a mention in virtually every nightly newscast. However, when Agent Brian Terry’s parents are begging the Obama administration for answers about their son’s death, that barely deserves a mention.
Third event: Jamie Zapata’s parent and Leo Partner filed a wrongful death law suit in Texas in the same 24 hour period that the EP was issued....What is he trying to hide from the Zapata family?
I saw your post earlier and decided to do some looking. Is this the report you were talking about?
And let us not forget bush’s ‘friend’, johnny sutton. The bushes and the clintons are ‘family’...in the mafia sense of the word.
Not just jarrett. reid and pelosi as well. pelosi wanted to retire and was hit with a big, “NO YOU DON’T.”
The News Babe probably thought the gang member would just say “in the US”and then she would report that and instead he told her the TRUTH that th “US GOVERNMENT”!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.