I understood they sent that provision back to the lower court for reconsideration.
Yup. They didn’t uphold it. They just punted on it. So there is nothing in this ruling for us to cheer.
Which does have to make you wonder what in the world John Roberts was smoking at the time.
How in the world can you find a state enforcing federal law to be contrary to that law just because a current executive doesn’t feel like enforcing it?